- #909 of 958
-
Re: Is There No Interest in Jeep SRT8? [guertin]
by jbjtkbw00
-
Mar 05, 2008 (2:54 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: guertin (Mar 05, 2008 12:33 am)
Well, I'm in the process of trying to purchase a used one, so don't have much info. I do know that the Hemi is getting a modest bump in ponies for next year, but not nearly enough to make it competitive, but we'll just have to see what it actually does for the vehicle.
|
- #910 of 958
-
Re: Is There No Interest in Jeep SRT8? [jbjtkbw00]
by aa00
-
Mar 05, 2008 (5:25 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: jbjtkbw00 (Mar 05, 2008 2:54 am)
I'm also looking into a used one. Anyone know when the actual cherokee is due for a redesign? Guertin- What year are you looking for and what kind of prices have you seen?
|
- #911 of 958
-
SRT8
by aa00
-
Mar 06, 2008 (1:23 pm)
-
|
|
Thinking about getting a used (2007) SRT8. I'm new to the jeep family as I have never owned one or for that matter a american car. Was wondering if most other buyers are previous jeep owners or not. I recently bought a X5 4.8is for my wife and really love that car. For some reason I'm just having a hard time with actually thinking of buying a chrysler product mainly because of things I have heard about cherokees in the past being unreliable? Still, I am really drawn to this truck and like everything about it. I will be coming out of a pickup and need this as my everyday car. I have 2 small kids and need to go into a suv of some kind. Any thoughts on this? thanks!!
|
- #912 of 958
-
Re: SRT8 [aa00]
by jbjtkbw00
-
Mar 06, 2008 (3:03 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: aa00 (Mar 06, 2008 1:23 pm)
I gotta warn you, if you are a family man and planning on getting this for an everyday vehicle, the SRT-8 is a little much for that. You're not talking a true suv. You're talking a vehicle that beats most cars (porches included) off the line and handles like a mother. Stoplights would probably be your biggest annoyances as you'll get everyone and their mother in anything that can be considered sporty pulling up next to you and revving their engines. Plus, as a family man and gas getting ever so closer to the $4/gallon mark, this thing gobbles the gas. You'll be lucky to get 15 HWY.
I just thought that I would give you the reality check before really looking into this particular trim of the Grand Cherokee.
|
- #913 of 958
-
Re: SRT8 [jbjtkbw00]
by htron
-
Mar 06, 2008 (3:25 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: jbjtkbw00 (Mar 06, 2008 3:03 pm)
but this thing is FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN!!!!!!!!!
|
- #914 of 958
-
Re: SRT8 [htron]
by jbjtkbw00
-
Mar 06, 2008 (4:15 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: htron (Mar 06, 2008 3:25 pm)
Oh I know. I've driven a few of them. Nothing like it!
|
- #915 of 958
-
Re: SRT8 [aa00]
by kodiakten
-
Mar 06, 2008 (7:20 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: aa00 (Mar 06, 2008 1:23 pm)
I had a 1996, the a 1999 Jeep GC Limited 5.7's then a 2002 BMW 4.4i X5 with all the options then now the 2006 Jeep GCSRT8 which I now have 33,000 miles under my belt in. Nothing short of my 69 427 Camaro in 1969-72 comes close to the fun of driving the “beast”. The SRT8 has no resemblance what so ever to the GC’s of past. Quality, ergonomics and interior design are light years better. When Daimler-Benz redesigned it, not only did they put rack and pinion steering with the V8 (unusual for a V8 SUV) that gives it long term precision steering but they covered basically every other complaint I had with the X5 and didn't add other to replace them. My X5 had a poor throttle pedal design (slack at start and sticky feeling when pressed after 20k miles, dealer said that’s the way they are), mirrors weren't great, seats weren't as comfy, heater warm up time was great (as is the SRT8) and the steering was precise and tight throughout it’s miles just like the SRT8. Cornering was confident in the BMW but nothing like the SRT8! Great and solid brake feel in both. A lot like the Corvettes I’ve driven. Throttle response in the BMW was good, but again nothing like the SRT8! The X5 had a few annoying issues like the seat belts denting the door panel when they retracted but great seat heaters both bottom and back, just like the Jeep’s. The X5 steering wheel blocked the Speedo and Tach in the position I liked the seat/wheel in, Jeep now is much better there to. The rolling rear storage cover is better in the Jeep as is all the little storage pockets and areas (though I thought the glove box flashlight/charger receptacle in the BMW was cool). Reliability & problems have been much better than the BMW too. Guess I could go on, but the Jeep really has it going with the SRT8 and I can say that after 30k miles, which is pretty good.
|
- #916 of 958
-
Re: SRT8 [aa00]
by guertin
-
Mar 06, 2008 (9:01 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: aa00 (Mar 06, 2008 1:23 pm)
You can relax regarding Jeep dependability. Until I bought a 2007 Jeep SRT8, I too had some concerns. But, according to Consumers Reports and other reviews, the Jeeps are much better built (perhaps the Mercedes influence). But, more importantly, this SUV is super fun to drive (power you won't believe) and safe too. And, for $45k, you can't beat it. And, the seats are quality as is the rest of the interior. The rear seating could have more room but for kids it is just fine. And, the front end could be 2 cm higher off the ground. And, I would like to get a little better than 13 mi/gal and even 600 HP!
There is a powerful Porche SUV that might have a little more acceleration. But, this sucker costs at least $95k! Nothing else comes close to the Jeep SRT8.
In summary, I love the car and would buy another instantly.
Jacques
|
- #918 of 958
-
More Powerful Jeep SRT8? [aa00]
by guertin
-
Mar 06, 2008 (9:26 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: aa00 (Mar 05, 2008 5:25 pm)
Hi aa00. Regarding design change for the Jeep SRT8 . . . I have heard rumors of more power in 2009 or 2010. But, I know little else. I know what I would like. 600 HP and 600 torque! And, 2 cm higher front end. And, rear fender lights that work. And, a little more room in the rear seating area. And, better visibility on the sides. Oh, and 20 mi/gal. But, not at the sacrifice of 0 to 60 mph in less than 5 s! In fact, I would like to see 0 to 60 mph in 4.5 s or less! This could be done (are you listening Daimler-Chrysler?) with use of graphite, titanium, magnesium, etc, to get the SUV at 4,000 lb but with no sacrifice of body strength. Cost is a likely problem. I would be willing to pay $10k more for all this.
Jacques
|
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
SUVs 
