Sign In Join 



Toyota in decline in 2009?

3807 messages,  Last post on Dec 06, 2009 at 9:40 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Toyota, Automotive News


Messages Page 281 of 382
1
...
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
...
382
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#2792 of 3807
Re: I have an old Consumer Guide... [gagrice] by fintail
Jul 14, 2009 (4:53 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Jul 14, 2009 2:45 pm)

That does seem to be the last time Toyota was at the top of its game - from then on, complaints have poured in and some of the mags have stopped swooning. I also don't remember seeing the Camry and Corolla taxis then that I often see now.
 
I will say my mother's 03 felt light years ahead of the Malibu rental I experienced back around that time.
#2793 of 3807
Re: I have an old Consumer Guide... [gagrice] by grandtotal
Jul 14, 2009 (6:39 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Jul 14, 2009 2:45 pm)

The 92-96 Camry was Toyota putting the world's manufacturers on notice. "This is what we can make for the price of a regular car". Those cars showed precision in construction which other manufacturers are only approaching today. Unfortunately the bean counters took control and the cars were "de-contented" for 1997 onwards though they still retain exemplary fit and finish, albeit with cheaper materials.
#2794 of 3807
Re: I have an old Consumer Guide... [grandtotal] by kdhspyder
Jul 19, 2009 (5:57 pm)
Reply

Replying to: grandtotal (Jul 14, 2009 6:39 pm)

I agree with this with the added note that the rock solid reliability was and is still there, excluding the sludge issues on some vehicles. I drove both a 97 Camry and a 00 Camry in excess of 150,000 miles each with only normal service.
 
But here's the kicker. These two older vehicles as good as they were would be unsalable today. Why? Lack of content and inflation.
 
These two vehicles cost about $20000 when new. The inflation rate over the years from 2000 to 2009 was about 3% p.a. That means that the price of these vehicles new $20000 in say Jan 2000 should be about $26000 in Jan 2009 - if they stayed only at the average rate of inflation.
 
However both older vehicles as compared to the new 2010's...
were 1" narrower and 4" shorter in wheelbase than the current vehicle
had 2.2L engines with 125 hp vs 2.5L engines with 169 hp
..getting 30 mpg Hwy vs 32 mpg Hwy
had 3.0L engines with 194 hp vs 3.5L engines with 268 hp
..getting 27 mpg Hwy vs 28 mpg Hwy
had 2 standard airbags vs 7 standard airbags in the current model
had 4ATs vs 6 ATs
 
However the two older vehicles were entirely lacking, except as options on certain models, the following which the 2010's have as standard equipment..
VSC and TC
active headrest restraints
ABS, EBD, BA
 
In addition the following options were not even available..
AUX, USB port, SKS, Navi, Bluetooth, hybrid capability.
 
IOW the new models are bigger, more comfortable, more powerful, more fuel efficient, with better safety features, with more advanced technologies available, needing less maintenance and are equally as dependable and reliable .... but at a price which is $2000 to $3000 lower than what the rate of inflation would suggest.
 
Sources:
2000 Camry
2010 Camry
 
Yes, I will admit that I am no fan of the look of the interior ( I do think that the exterior is the best of them all tho ). So what it appears has happened is that content has prevailed over superficial appearances.....all at a lower price !
#2795 of 3807
complacency and arrogance by steve_ HOST
Jul 21, 2009 (1:09 pm)
Reply
"Toyota Motor Corp. got "a little bit lost" in its North American strategy and fell out of touch with customers and the market, its new North American chief, Yoshimi Inaba, said Monday.
 
After years of growth and profits at Toyota, Mr. Inaba said, elements of complacency and arrogance infiltrated the company, which prides itself on being efficient and customer-oriented as well as constantly improving. To address this, Mr. Inaba plans an overhaul of Toyota's North American operations."
 
Toyota Lost Touch, Executive Says (WSJ via Yahoo, so hopefully the link will work).
#2796 of 3807
Re: complacency and arrogance [steve_] by gagrice
Jul 21, 2009 (3:13 pm)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Jul 21, 2009 1:09 pm)

Does not look like they will build the Prius here anytime soon if ever.
 
As part of the overall replanning process, Mr. Inaba said he is evaluating what to do with a partially built plant in Mississippi where Toyota planned to produce its Prius hybrid.
 
That factory was indefinitely postponed last year. Restarting work on it depends on how strong demand is for the Prius and how the company reshuffles production to address overcapacity. Prius sales have fallen after soaring last year amid then-high gasoline prices.

 
You should be able to get a good deal if you go for a new Prius with your old clunker
 
In an hour-long interview with reporters at Toyota's Washington office, Yoshimi Inaba said Toyota is not profitable in North America despite cost cutting in the organization, but he said he hopes the company could be profitable in its next fiscal year in North America. Inaba, who is president and chief operating officer of Toyota Motor America and chairman and CEO of Toyota Motor Sales USA, is taking up his responsibilities at a crucial time for the Japanese automaker..
 
http://www.detnews.com/article/20090721/AUTO01/907210324/1148/?source=nletter-bu- siness
 
They are suffering from many of the same problems that has plagued GM. They got to thinking they were better than the rest and could do what they wanted to do. I am not at all impressed with Toyota service after sale. Now the dealer I bought from has changed hands for the second time since I bought from them a year and a half ago. It will be the last vehicle I buy from Toyota. Unless on the slim chance they bring the Hi-Lux diesel to the USA.
 
http://www.toyotaofpoway.com/company_info.html
#2797 of 3807
Re: complacency and arrogance [gagrice] by steve_ HOST
Jul 21, 2009 (3:14 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Jul 21, 2009 3:13 pm)

You should be able to get a good deal if you go for a new Prius with your old clunker
 
Especially if gas prices stay low for a while longer. If I could just get a lift kit for it.
 
With the way the car will come on now and then and recharge the little battery, and the addition of the 120 volt outlet in the 2010 model, we're thinking we could go camping here in the desert in August and just put a portable AC in the tent and run it all night on a few ounces of gas. Not green, but cool.
 
And reading about all the hacks you can do on them is pretty entertaining too.
#2798 of 3807
Re: complacency and arrogance [steve_] by gagrice
Jul 21, 2009 (4:01 pm)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Jul 21, 2009 3:14 pm)

Ground clearance is a big issue for me. I hate parking a low slung car and have it scrape on the concrete bumpers in parking lots. Also dragging on steep driveways that are prevalent in most places. I am trying to picture a Prius with a 3 inch lift kit. Big mud "n" snow tires and a brush guard.
#2799 of 3807
Re: complacency and arrogance [gagrice] by berri
Jul 21, 2009 (5:22 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Jul 21, 2009 3:13 pm)

Heck, I don't think any high fixed cost business can make money when their market turns upside down like auto's have. Toyota will come back because a lot of people want conservative, reliable cars. However, the big news to me is that Ford has passed Toyota in intial quality. If they can do this longer term it will be huge. Plus more and more Honda problems are popping up on the net like apparently faulty, or at least unreliable, air conditioners and trannies which are both BIG dollar repairs. I hope D3 can capitalize on this because competition is good for the buyer! I do agree that Toyota AND Honda seem to have become arrogant and are making D3 type errors.
#2800 of 3807
Re: complacency and arrogance [berri] by grandtotal
Jul 22, 2009 (9:46 am)
Reply

Replying to: berri (Jul 21, 2009 5:22 pm)

However, the big news to me is that Ford has passed Toyota in initial quality. If they can do this longer term it will be huge.
 
I could not care less about initial quality. It's long term quality that I want. That's the sort of quality than can be measured quantitatively by looking at repair/maintenance costs long term, not short term surveys of questionable worth. I agree, if they can do it long term then it will be huge. Unless there is a fundamental change in their approach I doubt they will achieve it, though anything is possible.
#2801 of 3807
Re: I have an old Consumer Guide... [kdhspyder] by mcdawgg
Jul 23, 2009 (10:45 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kdhspyder (Jul 19, 2009 5:57 pm)

Hey Bob (kdhspyder) - I have a question for you on your carspace email - please take a look.
 
Thanks!

Messages Page 281 of 382
1
...
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
...
382
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement