Sign In Join 



Toyota in decline in 2009?

3618 messages,  Last post on Nov 28, 2009 at 7:57 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Toyota, Automotive News


Messages Page 269 of 363
1
...
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
...
363
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#2673 of 3618
Re: sinking further.... [nippononly] by boaz47
May 08, 2009 (1:33 pm)
Reply

Replying to: nippononly (May 08, 2009 12:28 pm)

Nissan was down 35.8 percent in US sales YTD. They were off 40 percent on trucks. Suzuki is getting hammered and even Subaru is finally slipping into the negative. - .8 percent YTD and -6.7 percent April to April. Hyundai, Kia, and Subaru seem to be holding one with their smaller market share but it looks like Hyundai is starting to turn around a bit.
 
Before the Altima Nissan was in deep trouble and now with this downturn we will have to see just how much Renault is willing to prop them up. The Titan didn't reach projection nor did the Armanda. My guess is Nissan will report a pretty big loss this year.
#2674 of 3618
Re: sinking further.... [nippononly] by kdhspyder
May 08, 2009 (3:44 pm)
Reply

Replying to: nippononly (May 08, 2009 12:28 pm)

Well the San Antonio plant was and is going to a 'long term' investment to be kind. It's going to have to live a good 10+ yrs to recoup its costs instead of the normal 5 yrs.
 
Yes Toyota was much more involved in the BOF vehicles much like the detroiters but it's product portfolio was in much better balance. Whereas the other 3 were 60-75% dependent on these products Toyota's BOF sales here were more in the range of 30-35% of total. That 30-35%, or about 600K vehicles, is in the crapper now.
 
But Toyota also had to account for currency losses for the last 6 months on a large part of it's sales, almost 50% which were imported, including a bunch of BOF vehicles. There was a double whammy there.
 
So ... they've cut back on the exports from Japan and they've cut WAY back on the BOF vehicle production. But the weight of the producing plants remains.
#2675 of 3618
Re: Still... [iluvmysephia1] by boaz47
May 12, 2009 (1:24 pm)
Reply

Replying to: iluvmysephia1 (May 04, 2009 9:45 am)

"and purchasing a VW would to me be in the same category as purchasing a Fiat."
 
There is no choice but to point out the obvious here. But anyone that would take a c
hance on a Kia after they went BK and were picked up by Hyundai has very little room to complain about anyone let alone Fiat. But you have a right to your opinion. I never liked the sales and service of VW but the new VWs almost tempted me.
#2676 of 3618
Re: Still... [boaz47] by berri
May 12, 2009 (6:11 pm)
Reply

Replying to: boaz47 (May 12, 2009 1:24 pm)

Its weird, but Kia and Hyundai seem like totally different level cars to me. The Kia reeks cheapness, but the Hyundai's aren't bad even though its the same company now.
#2677 of 3618
Re: Still... [berri] by boaz47
May 17, 2009 (8:17 pm)
Reply

Replying to: berri (May 12, 2009 6:11 pm)

It isn't on topic so we shouldn't go too far with it but if you research the kia BK you will see Hyundai was almost forced to take Kia by the Government. They have decided to use the company as an entry level car company to get people interested in their better cars by Hyundai. Much like Toyota did with Scion. You will notice they have more quality issues with scion than Toyota and they are the same company.
 
But if you look at how things are right now entry level cars are doing better than just about anyone.
#2678 of 3618
Re: Still... [boaz47] by kdhspyder
May 18, 2009 (9:29 am)
Reply

Replying to: boaz47 (May 17, 2009 8:17 pm)

Your SOTP opinion seems not to be reflected in the actual owner's views..
 
Most reliable small car 2009 ( CR ) .. Scion xD.
http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2008/autos/0810/gallery.cr_most_reliable/3.html
 
Also very reilable sporty car 2009 ( CR ) ,, Scion tC
http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2008/autos/0810/gallery.cr_most_reliable/4.html
 
The low-volume Scion xB is 'middle of the pack' according to JD Power.
 
Your characterisations are at best unintentionally erroneous due to lack of knowledge or .... intentionally misleading. Since these ratings are so widely published and available in numerous places all over the internet you should at least check a few sources before typing.
 
Facts are your friends.
#2679 of 3618
Re: Still... [kdhspyder] by boaz47
May 19, 2009 (3:38 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kdhspyder (May 18, 2009 9:29 am)

You make it too easy. Toyota makes the scion yet Toyota's dependability is higher, or am I mis quoting something? In 2008 Toyota was rated near the top in dependability. Right below Caddy, Mercury and Lexus. Scion was below Hummer? Could that be something you missed? Maybe it doesn't fit your spin?
 
Not wanting to trust my memory I looked up the 2009 JD powers dependability study, posted as you say for everyone to see and two things were easy to see. Toyota still was near thee top as a whole and Scion was still below Hummer, Jeep and even Kia. Explain that if they are putting as much effort into quality as their main brand. Now look at Hyundai in the very same graph. Here is the site so everyone else can see for themselves, since you brought it up.
http://www.jdpower.com/corporate/news/releases/pressrelease.aspx?ID=2009043
 
Now explain how Hyundai who owns Kia can be above average and Kia well below if they are putting the same effort into both brands. And I have the very same question for Toyota quality if Scion gets such a low rating?
 
I know it is tempting to cherry pick models and forget brands. There are good VW models as well but as a company? I bet there is even a good Suzuki but where are they rated? We often talk about company reputation when talking about domestics but retreat to a good model when talking about foreign cars. doubble standard?
#2680 of 3618
Re: Still... [boaz47] by grandtotal
May 19, 2009 (4:58 pm)
Reply

Replying to: boaz47 (May 19, 2009 3:38 pm)

Previous Toyotas:
Corolla sold at 8 years, repair total $3.48
Corolla sold at 6.5 years, repair total $0
 
Current Toyotas:
Corolla at 6 years, will keep until 8 years unless it needs repairs, repairs so far $0
Prius at 1.5 years, will keep until 8 years unless it needs repairs, repairs so far $0
#2681 of 3618
Re: Still... [grandtotal] by boaz47
May 19, 2009 (5:37 pm)
Reply

Replying to: grandtotal (May 19, 2009 4:58 pm)

Good for you but what does that have to do with the difference between Toyota and Scion dependability? I didn't say they weren't dependable I said they were more dependable than Scion. I think I only I have ever had one yota, a Small Sr-5 pickup. Rented a few Camry and liked it well enough.
 
But I did once consider a T-100 when they were first going to come out as a full sized truck. Didn't turn out to be a real work truck so I passed and got a Ram.
 
But thanks for the information even if I have no clue what it was for.
#2682 of 3618
Re: Still... [boaz47] by nippononly
May 19, 2009 (5:45 pm)
Reply

Replying to: boaz47 (May 19, 2009 5:37 pm)

Looks like the Scion tC made the latest list of most satisfying models though:
 
http://wot.motortrend.com/6540456/auto-news/cadillac-scores-top-brand-satisfacti- on-award-in-autopacific-survey/index.html
 
I note with interest that neither Corolla nor Camry are on that list, but then they probably shouldn't feel bad, Honda only got one hit total, out of 18 categories....
 
And I guess Prius and Sienna are still satisfying their owners to the max.

Messages Page 269 of 363
1
...
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
...
363
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement