Sign In Join 



Toyota in decline in 2009?

3255 messages,  Last post on Nov 10, 2009 at 2:02 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Toyota, Automotive News


Messages Page 241 of 326
1
...
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
...
326
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#2399 of 3255
Re: Semi-official fuel economy numbers from today.. [kdhspyder] by larsb
Jan 12, 2009 (9:22 am)
Reply

Replying to: kdhspyder (Jan 12, 2009 9:19 am)

I wonder why the UK press was reporting 75 UK MPG? At 50 USA, it will only be about 60 MPG UK.
 
Wonder where the missing MPG went?
#2400 of 3255
Re: speaking of the Prius [larsb] by gagrice
Jan 12, 2009 (9:24 am)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Jan 12, 2009 7:19 am)

Expected 75 MPG is Toyota hype. Toyota does not sell well when competing with the diesels in the UK. So they do that to get people interested. They did that in the USA with their Prius rated at 60 MPG when you were lucky to get 48 MPG. Like you always say I will believe it when it is on the Toyota website.
 
Question, why are they giving UK figures and prices at the Detroit Auto show. Did we switch to pound sterling?
 
This combined effort means the new Prius will, return around 75mpg and emit less than 100g/km of C02.
 
All this will come at a cost though, when the new Prius is released in October prices will start from £18,225.
 
Further details to follow after the new Prius is officially unveiled...

 
That is about $27k for a base model....
#2401 of 3255
Re: speaking of the Prius [gagrice] by larsb
Jan 12, 2009 (9:41 am)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Jan 12, 2009 9:24 am)

That's a site in the UK that came from. They are covering the show for the UK folks.
#2402 of 3255
Re: speaking of the Prius [gagrice] by larsb
Jan 12, 2009 (10:09 am)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Jan 12, 2009 9:24 am)

Yes, we know Gary, according to you, Toyota is 90% Liars and 10% Fibbers.
 
We got you........
#2403 of 3255
Re: Semi-official fuel economy numbers from today.. [larsb] by bumpy
Jan 12, 2009 (10:57 am)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Jan 12, 2009 9:22 am)

Different testing regimens. The EPA is more, um, pessimistic.
#2404 of 3255
Re: speaking of the Prius [gagrice] by kdhspyder
Jan 12, 2009 (11:13 am)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Jan 12, 2009 9:24 am)

Those are not only values in Imp Gal but they are also test done according to UK testing standards, not the EPA standards.
 
It has nothing to do with lying but in the fact that the testing procedures are different, nothing more. It's the same problem Honda had with the diesel Accord that was going to get 50 mpg here when converted to US gal. Unfortunately the NADM TSX diesel prolly is only going to get 38-40 if it ever gets launched.
 
Thus in comparing UK values to EPA values you'd have to deflate the number by 20% for volumetric differences and then deflate that number by another 20% for testing differences.
#2405 of 3255
of course by nippononly
Jan 12, 2009 (12:12 pm)
Reply
in gaining only 4 points on the fuel economy rating, Prius also becomes more powerful - why? to cover increased weight as a result of making it bigger? I hope they didn't make it faster at the expense of fuel economy.
 
When oh when will Toyota produce the wider line of hybrids it has been promising for years now? Still no hybrid Corolla - when? With any luck Honda's new Insight will beat the new Prius's 52 mpg - we need an honest 60 mpg 5-passenger car in the States pronto.
#2406 of 3255
Re: of course [nippononly] by anythngbutgm
Jan 12, 2009 (12:46 pm)
Reply

Replying to: nippononly (Jan 12, 2009 12:12 pm)

There's always the HS250 Lexus which I guess you could say is a hybrid Corolla
 
link title
 
I believe it's more of an Avensis than a Corolla, but still, sizewise it qualifies. Also, I read that the Insight is going to be rated at 40/43. Maybe the real world numbers will put it closer to the Prius.
#2407 of 3255
Re: of course [nippononly] by louiswei
Jan 12, 2009 (12:49 pm)
Reply

Replying to: nippononly (Jan 12, 2009 12:12 pm)

With any luck Honda's new Insight will beat the new Prius's 52 mpg - we need an honest 60 mpg 5-passenger car in the States pronto.
 
Well apparently Honda is out of luck because...
 
The Insight is rated at 40 city/43 highway , which, mind you, is not even better than the CURRENT gen Prius.
 
Prius > Insight hands down.
 
Source: 2010 Honda Insight EX Full Test and Video
#2408 of 3255
Re: of course [louiswei] by larsb
Jan 12, 2009 (12:57 pm)
Reply

Replying to: louiswei (Jan 12, 2009 12:49 pm)

From your linked story:
 
"We couldn't measure fuel economy on our customary test loops at home, but we devised a 197-mile substitute in Arizona. This suburban loop had more rural two-lanes in it than our usual Orange County course, but we're still impressed by the 51.5-mpg result our 2010 Honda Insight EX achieved."

Combine the fact that it is about $5K less than a comparably-equipped Prius, and it looks like at the VERY LEAST in MPH
 
2010 Insight = Prius

Messages Page 241 of 326
1
...
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
...
326
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement