Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Automotive News & Views Sales Flops of 2005
729 messages, Last post on May 08, 2006 at 7:51 AM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
|
Once we get the archives back, this one will move there and we'll wind up with a 2006 topic. That's so 500 years from now, when archaeologists are digging for clues here, they won't have to wade through a 10,000 post topic that contains the sales flops from all those years 
|
|
|
Replying to: bumpy (May 05, 2006 6:00 am) What are NC's?
|
|
|
Replying to: carguy58 (May 06, 2006 1:36 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: pf_flyer (May 06, 2006 10:10 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: 210delray (May 06, 2006 6:23 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: bumpy (May 06, 2006 2:06 pm) Torrent does look too much like the Equinox, and why do both get the old 3.4l made in China when GM has a much better 3500 engine on the shelf? Maybe they used the old molds and shipped them to China? Any how, Suzuki won out, because they get the stretch version of that platform with 3 rows of seats, plus a superior engine with 250hp. That should have been the Pontiac. -juice |
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views Sales Flops of 2005
