- #6 of 50
-
Re: My tiburon highs and lows [cfbd1273]
by n82002
-
Nov 19, 2005 (12:34 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: cfbd1273 (Nov 14, 2005 8:57 pm)
Yeah I definitely have some more thinking to do about these two cars but I have been really considering the tC as I am starting to feel that fuel economy is a little more of a priority for me right now. I am also leaning towards the tC because I have heard that the tiburon does not have as good build quality as the tC since the scion is a Toyota.
Also I am starting to consider the new civic, mostly because I like the new look of the interior. But do I like it enough to give up my factory warranty covored led lights in the footwells and cupholders? 
|
- #7 of 50
-
Re: Hyundai Tiburon Vs. Scion tC [n82002]
by richs3
-
Apr 09, 2006 (10:05 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: n82002 (Nov 03, 2005 6:25 pm)
Well, I see I am responding a bit late, relatively to your question, but having owned both cars, I will say this (sorry other TC owners). Before I totalled my Tiburon, I was VERY happy with it. I am "okay" with my TC, it looks nice, and gets nice looks from people, however, I will only speak from my personal experience and framework of perspective, if you like speed, and you like 'zippy', and you like comfort, and you like bang for the buck, go with Hyundai, because they provide, at least for that car model, more results, even though perhaps with less rhetoric. Sure, you can add accessories to the TC until you're blue in the face, or in the pocketbook, but with Hyundai, you get it coming right out of the gate. I have never really experienced love for a car before, that Hyunda, and sorrow somewhat, that I totalled it in a mishap. I did not have it for more than 6 months, so I cannot comment authoritatively on how it holds up over time, but I only know that it "fit" me, much better than TC, and that while I had it, I never had problem with it, and was always very satisfied. So, rhetoric and market all you want Toyota, but it takes more than hype, it takes true value for the dollar. I had leather seats, and most everything else, right out of the gate, plus a better engine, and better road feel.
|
- #8 of 50
-
Re: Hyundai Tiburon Vs. Scion tC [richs3]
by m1miata
-
Apr 11, 2006 (9:52 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: richs3 (Apr 09, 2006 10:05 pm)
Why did you not then buy another Tiburon?
-Loren
|
- #9 of 50
-
Re: Hyundai Tiburon Vs. Scion tC [carlisimo]
by richs3
-
Apr 12, 2006 (6:00 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: carlisimo (Nov 04, 2005 10:30 am)
More roomy is it? Not for the driver. How tall are you, no I do not want to know, but in relation to your legs, in particular your right leg, do you find your right leg having a whole lot of room as it rubs up against the console? I am only 6 feet tall, do not think myself to be tall, and yet, I feel my right leg to be overly confined by the console, I would say that it is bad design, oversight, and/or neglect by the designers of TC. Roomy, but not for the driver? Well, sorry, but the driver should come first, as they are usually the one always in it. (humor)
|
- #10 of 50
-
Re: Hyundai Tiburon Vs. Scion tC [m1miata]
by richs3
-
Apr 12, 2006 (6:07 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: m1miata (Apr 11, 2006 9:52 pm)
Interesting thing about Toyota/Scion/TC. It (conveniently for the dealer) usually has to be ordered in, you cannot simply go to the dealership and take a look see, or test drive. One would think, Toyota having been around for a while longer, and its (supposed) good reputation, all things being equal it would be a safe bet. I feel that I listened to their rhetoric and marketing too much, and went against my instinct in buying a car that most lots didn't even have one to look at in person. It sounded like a slightly more economical deal also. That is, until you go to dealership, and they advise you that if you want to buy it, you need to add a number of its options or accessories to make it worth their while, because otherwise they will not make much on it. Sort of a no-haggle haggle, so to speak. Another marketing ploy.
|
- #11 of 50
-
Re: Hyundai Tiburon Vs. Scion tC [1racefan]
by richs3
-
Apr 12, 2006 (6:17 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: 1racefan (Nov 04, 2005 4:27 am)
The performance of a car, i.e. it's acceleration in this context, is not a matter of opinion, it is a matter of reality. To compare the TC's 4 cylinder to Tib's 6 cylinder, (?) It in no wise has the pick up or the zip of a Tiburon, and especially towards the top end. Yes, you could get their turbo booster for a mere 3,000 more, but then . . . you could do the same for the Tiburon also for that additional price. And as far as drive and comfort goes, (okay here an opinion) I had much more of a smile on my face with Tiburon. The best thing TC has going for it are its looks, and yes, it is roomier in the back seat, and perhaps the side seat, but what is the driver's first concern? I prefer the moonroof, and its functionality in the Tiburon, to the TC, it opens higher, if my memory serves me correctly, and they don't have problems.
|
- #12 of 50
-
Re: Hyundai Tiburon Vs. Scion tC [richs3]
by m1miata
-
Apr 12, 2006 (2:55 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: richs3 (Apr 12, 2006 6:07 am)
I bought a 1976 Starfire, with a stick, without testing one. Well it took an weightlifter jab of the left leg to get the clutch to move. After some years of doing this, the bracket which holds the cable actually came though the firewall of the car. It was a slow, but fun enough, piece of GM junk. Heck, I traveled a lot, and had fun, be it slowly. In those days the speed limit was 55 and the car revved super high at anything over 65. I imagine top end was like 85. My bet is that they had spare truck gearing and clutches they put in those cars. Assorted things broke off, like the inside door handle, then the outside had the rust around the window. Typical of the years of decline. Too bad, since Oldsmobiles, like the 442, and Toronado and such were once great cars.
Anyway, always test out a car first. I did enjoy the test drive of the Tiburon. It is not as sporty a handling as is say the Celica, or a Miata, but non-the-less fun to drive, and the engine feels and sounds better. Interior looks rich and solid.
I am amazed at the Hyundai comeback!
-Loren
|
- #13 of 50
-
Re: Hyundai Tiburon Vs. Scion tC [m1miata]
by richs3
-
Apr 12, 2006 (8:43 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: m1miata (Apr 12, 2006 2:55 pm)
I understand that Miatas are one of the sportiest cars to handle and manuever. That is definitely a 'success car' for its niche. (For its niche.) The TC is a good car, I don't mean to overly diminish it, it does have distinct qualities of its own, just that I felt more secure and natural in the Tib. Again, that's all a personal thing. Someone else might not. It is interesting that the T-dealership did not want me to take TC onto the freeway at all in my test drive, even though close by, whereas I got to take a substantially longer ride in the Tib before I bought it. And it just seemed to fit me in its feel and handling.
|
- #14 of 50
-
Cheap Car with Poor warenty (Tiburon)
by ederekb
-
Jul 19, 2006 (1:06 pm)
-
|
See this post
http://townhall-talk.edmunds.com/WebX/.f0c9eb6/4
$2000 in service on my '03 with 30K Miles. Warenty wont cover it.
-Derek 
|
- #15 of 50
-
Re: Cheap Car with Poor warenty (Tiburon) [ederekb]
by m1miata
-
Sep 10, 2006 (12:41 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: ederekb (Jul 19, 2006 1:06 pm)
Actually it has the longest warranty of all the makers of automobiles. Clutches on stick shift autos are not covered, and will not be on most warranties, if any, of other makes of cars. It is simply not going to happen. If they supplied defective parts, and it is proven to be the case, then and only then will the company be held reliable. In all other cases it is not covered. Check the details on other manufacturer warranties. Once again, this is not a debate on the clutch issue, but rather what the warranty shall cover.
-Loren
|
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Hatchbacks 
