Sign In Join 



2007 Chevrolet Suburban/GMC Yukon XL/Cadillac Escalade ESV - READ ONLY

44 messages,  Last post on Jan 16, 2007 at 8:57 AM

You are in the Chevrolet Suburban & Tahoe Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Chevrolet Suburban, GMC Yukon XL, Cadillac Escalade ESV


Messages Page 3 of 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#13 of 44
Re: [gmdownhill] by tireguy
Jan 05, 2006 (6:33 pm)

Replying to: gmdownhill (Dec 16, 2005 8:53 am)

You're right. From the rear quarter it looks exactly like a late model Expedition, which is anything but impressive.
I sure hope the pickups won't look like this.
Coil springs in the front? What's with GM? First they go back to rear drum brakes on their full-size pickups, now coil springs on the SUV. Somebody's been watching too much "I love the 80s" on VH1. Granted these are coil-over, not just coils, but the torsion bars offered height adjustability and ease of damper replacement.
Power-folding second row? In the outgoing model you can fold the seats down with a bag of groceries in your other hand. And the middle seats are as comfortable as the front buckets. The new power seats look significantly slimmer in the base (see demo on GMC's website). The cockpit does look a bit better. A little Walnut goes a long way. But why the heck would I want a heated steering wheel? To keep the cold leather from chilling my tender hands? So much for the working man's professional grade truck! At least they That 6.2L would be a tremendous improvement over the 5.3, but it's only available in the Denali, so once again--it appears--if you want the big engine you can't have a real four wheel drive system (with a low range and locking transfer case).
Go to the GMC site and stare at the 07 Yukon, the click over to the 06 picture. The 00-06 Yukon is one of the nicest trucks the General ever put on the streets.
I certainly won't be trading in my 04 Yukon XL on one of these Envoy XXLs any time soon.
#14 of 44
Escalade ESV by navigator89
Jan 08, 2006 (5:15 am)
http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/01/06/detroit-2006-cadillac-announces-escalade-- esv/
 
Looks awesome!
#15 of 44
Re: Rear seats [samnoe] by nedzel
Jan 11, 2006 (9:33 am)

Replying to: samnoe (Nov 16, 2005 5:09 pm)

Nope, it won't fold into the floor, since GM cheaped out and stuck with a solid-rear axle. If they'd gone with an independent-rear suspension, then there would have been room for the 3rd row seat to fold into the floor.
#16 of 44
Re: Rear seats [samnoe] by nedzel
Jan 11, 2006 (9:31 am)

Replying to: samnoe (Nov 16, 2005 5:09 pm)

Nope, it won't fold into the floor, since GM cheaped out and stuck with a solid-rear axle. If they'd gone with an independent-rear suspension, then there would have been room for the 3rd row seat to fold into the floor.
#18 of 44
Re: 2007 Chevrolet Suburban/GMC Yukon XL/Cadillac Escalade ESV [navigator89 by motoworf
Jan 13, 2006 (7:35 am)

Replying to: navigator89 (Nov 02, 2005 12:10 pm)

Oh, gawd...
It looks like it still won't have the beloved rear cargo doors on my current Suburban.
It is a show stopper for me not moving on to a newer model as was the reason I didn't bother with Yukon or Escalade when I bought my current Suburban.
#19 of 44
New Yukon XL by neo6
Jan 14, 2006 (6:51 pm)
I have to agree with others who say this looks like an XXL Envoy. Seems like GM could have had a little more imagination when redesigning one of the best exterior designs on the SUV market. The interior and features is what was so dated. I would rather they had left the exterior alone and dressed up the interior and added some features. I have a 2003 XL and am really now on the fence of waiting for one of these for a second look or go ahead and buy one of the last "good-looking" 2006 models..
#20 of 44
foot space by kburban
Jan 16, 2006 (12:18 pm)
Is there going to be a footwell for the third seat in the 2007. As the 2006 is configured, the third seat passengers must look like "see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil". I'm still driving a '97 with 215K m. I was shopping for an '05 or '06 last week and gave up in disgust. It's too much money for something that doesn't do the basics. I can do without the bells and whistles-just want leather seats, comfortable hwy travel and reliable engine.
#21 of 44
Re: Rear seats [nedzel] by tireguy
Jan 18, 2006 (12:16 pm)

Replying to: nedzel (Jan 11, 2006 9:31 am)

If it had an independant rear end, then it could really compete with the modern-day LTD wagon, the Expedition. Independant rear suspension might be great on Corvettes, but it's not what I want on a truck.
#22 of 44
deisel for 07 by arkitect
Feb 16, 2006 (3:52 pm)
Will there be one? GM has one of if not the best diesel engines but i need to have plenty of interior room. The Avalanche would be just what I am looking for but they are not making even a 2500 Avalanche for the beggining of the mew model's life span and a duramax would not fit on a 1500. So will there still be a 2500 Suburban and will it be a diesel if there still is a 2500. I have an 83 GMC diesel suburban and let me tell you if I can get an 07 diesel I would deffinitley buy it when I have the money.

Messages Page 3 of 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement