Sign In Join 



BMW 3-series vs Lexus IS

1527 messages,  Last post on May 20, 2009 at 1:33 PM

You are in the BMW 3-Series Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Lexus IS, Lexus IS 250, Lexus IS 350, BMW 3 Series, Sedan


Messages Page 7 of 153
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
153
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#61 of 1527
Passionate Pursuit of BMW by dl7265
Oct 25, 2005 (10:17 pm)
Reply
Since this World Series game is never going to end , ill post some quick impressions of the IS I tested. It was a Crystal White/Cashmere with only 18" wheels as options. The Smart access worked well enough, however the remote is quite larger than my Bimmer remote. The interior is standard Lexus fare, Nice leather, carpets ect...It was a balmy 72F in Dallas and I took a extended drive on familure roads. I quickly made my way to some twisties to get to the meat of the matter. How would the L stack up against my 3er ? EnRoute, I noticed the 6 changer and Audio system would get the edge over my base radio. The I notice the side mirrors WOW were talking Yukon honkers here...
 
  I was explained that the car had the Electronic steering and did not have any steering fluid. It felt light compaired to my vehicle, thats the best I can describe it. I entered the twisties that require about a 1/2 shuffle steer to maintain your lane. Interestingly enough even with a tire size advantage 17 vs18, and non run flats it began to break away sooner than my 325i would. With the 255/40/18 in rear it was a little unexpected. We cross some railroad tracks and its solid and quiet. Now to the service road for a little excelleration test, smooth and fluid but the almost second 0-60 times dist vantage is felt. A few more turns and we are back.
 
 I check out the trunk which has a smaller opening and no fold down seat option. But the cubic feet is quoted the same. Now to the back seat which gives up a whopping 4 inches to the 3er.
 
I glance over the brochure at home and notice its all about Germany and Nurburgring every page. hmmm
 
Id break it down by saying the content per dollar goes to the L, with leather, power seats, homelink,Smart acess, metallic paint, knee airbags and auto dimming mirrors standard.
 
 But, it gives up excellent steering feel, suspension and a Power disatvantage. And the lack of a usable back seat, storage .
 
If tomorrow BMW stopped importing cars to the US , because of RWD and Manual option it would probally get my vote. Both are Very fine automobiles. But in my mind there is still a bit of pursuit going on here
 
DL
#62 of 1527
Re: Reliability [g17] by texasmerq
Oct 26, 2005 (1:22 am)
Reply

Replying to: g17 (Oct 24, 2005 5:06 am)

Sorry to hear about your problem with your Mercedes. I'm sure it's somewhat uncharacteristic though. My mom has a 1998 C280 and my sister has a 2004 C230. Both cars has been pretty flawless for them outside routine maintenance. The same has to be said for everyone else I know with a Mercedes.I hear stories about people's BMW experience but I don't know how bad it really is all things considered.
#63 of 1527
Define "performance" and "handling" by newcars
Oct 26, 2005 (6:32 am)
Reply
Not trying to be funny or over-critical but I think we all may be using the terms "performance" and "handling" indiscriminately.
 
Performance generally means things like accelerations and how fast the car goes. The more objective or "measurable" things that have more to do with a car's engine and transmission.
 
Handling has more to do with how well (and fast) a car takes a turn. And I would also add that it takes more into account with the subjective "feel" of a car. The handling of a car really has more to do with steering, suspension and (to a degree) the ergonomics.
 
Having said the above, in comparing the Lexus IS350 and the BMW 330i, I would say that the Lexus wins the former (performance) while the BMW wins the latter (handling). We each may differ on how and how much we value the differences, strengths and weaknesses of the respective cars, but I think most of us (although definitely not all) would characterize the two cars as such.
 
And when you think about it, that probably isn't too surprising. Lexus was definitely "aiming" for the BMW 3-series with its IS automobile and it would make perfect sense that they would come closer if not exceed in the more "objective and measurable" areas of performance yet fall short in the more "subjective" areas of handling.
 
I personally prefer the Lexus IS350 over the BMW 330i but BMW's do have a certain "magic" with their handling that others (not just Lexus but everyone) have been unsuccessfully trying to duplicate for years.
 
And on another note, European Delivery is a great option with BMW that I really am surprised more people don't take advantage of. The cost savings of even a 3-series will more than pay for the cost of the trip. Go to the section on European Delivery on the BMW website (don't know if I'm permitted to link it here) and look it up. You might be pleasantly surprised.
#64 of 1527
Re: Reliability [lovemyclk] by g17
Oct 26, 2005 (7:14 am)
Reply

Replying to: lovemyclk (Oct 25, 2005 12:29 pm)

I had a hard time with it too!! Anyway the way they explained it was, the radiator failed, the trans cooler behind it didn't get enough air, causing the Trans and torque converter to run hotter than allowed, burning out both. It made sense to me when they explained it. Yep the repairs were covered. MB does fix the problems, no doubt, BUT the problems occur too frequently for me.
#65 of 1527
Content by ivan_99
Oct 26, 2005 (8:57 am)
Reply
ED (the good kind)…too bad they don’t offer it with the M3. I personally would prefer to spend 48K (44K Invoice) on a “base” M3 than a loaded IS350 or 330i.
 
Sunroof – just gets sun in my eyes
SMG – no need in getting a performance sedan if you go this route
Power Mirrors, Seats – how many times do I need to adjust these
Heated seats/power rear shade/parking distance sonar – fluff
Stereo – Either I have the AC blowing loud, or if it’s not hot I have the windows open, so who can tell the difference.
 
Xenons…maybe
 
To tell the truth…if all I wanted was “content” the just reviewed Hyundai Azera seems to offer the most for the least (plus 265hp...0-60 6.5 with an auto) for under 30K.
#66 of 1527
Re: Define "performance" and "handling" [newcars] by sdiver68
Oct 27, 2005 (3:44 am)
Reply

Replying to: newcars (Oct 26, 2005 6:32 am)

I have to disagree to some extent. I thought your definition of handling was spot on. However, to me, performance is not the exclusive domain of acceleration and speed. Rather, how well each car would do if put on a road race track. One disparate example, take a Nissan Altima V6 and a Mazda Miata. I believe the Altima V6 would win the drag race, but the Miata would win on most road race courses. I would consider the Miata to perform better, all around, then the Altima.
 
How about another example of similar cars, a 330i Sport versus a G35x. I would argue that for many people in the US, the G35X is the all around better performer. True, the 330 should edge the G35x in the dry, but throw a bit of rain, ice, or snow into the mix and the G35x should leave the 330i "all wet". So, the better performer would be different for someone who lives in SoCal then from someone who lives in upstate NY.
#67 of 1527
performance and handling by stickguy
Oct 27, 2005 (6:34 am)
Reply
you can argue about which car wins which catagory (and of course the criteria for "winning" is going to be somewhat subjective). But, as an outsider (I don't currently own either make), both these cars have a lot of each catagory!
 
So, IMO, even finishing second in a camparo doesn't exactly make either car a "loser". The world just isn't quite that absolute.
 
But, that's why there are so many choices available, so there should be something for everyone (kinda like spouses...)
#68 of 1527
Re: Define "performance" and "handling" [sdiver68] by newcars
Oct 27, 2005 (7:58 am)
Reply

Replying to: sdiver68 (Oct 27, 2005 3:44 am)

First, I'd like to add "braking" to another characteristic of performance. That is another "objective" characteristic that I would personally qualify under "performance". Having said that:
 
You know what, sdiver68, I don't totally disagree with you. However, I think your race course example also brings into question the idea of "handling". I would say that "performance" has to do with how fast you get from point A to point B while "handling" is more about how well you take the twists and turns. Thus, the road race brings in aspects of both.
#69 of 1527
Re: performance and handling [stickguy] by newcars
Oct 27, 2005 (7:59 am)
Reply

Replying to: stickguy (Oct 27, 2005 6:34 am)

AGREED!
#70 of 1527
Re: Define "performance" and "handling" [sdiver68] by kdshapiro
Oct 27, 2005 (8:41 am)
Reply

Replying to: sdiver68 (Oct 27, 2005 3:44 am)

Comparing a 330 to a G35x is bogus - just as 330xi to G35. Compare a G35 to a 330 or a 330xi to a G35x.

Messages Page 7 of 153
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
153
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement