Sign In Join 



BMW 3-series vs Lexus IS

1527 messages,  Last post on May 20, 2009 at 1:33 PM

You are in the BMW 3-Series Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Lexus IS, Lexus IS 250, Lexus IS 350, BMW 3 Series, Sedan


Messages Page 2 of 153
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
153
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#11 of 1527
Reliability by g17
Oct 21, 2005 (4:50 am)
Reply
Lexus beats BMW at all model levels in reliability, why should this be any different. My entry-level lux. is my commuter car so it needs to be reliable. I couldn't care less about cornering at high speeds as if I were filming an Earnest & Julio Gallo wine commercial thru the mountain roads of Europe. I drive on the NJ Tpk, I pass lots of BMW's on the road taking advantage of their road-side assistance. Until BMW or MB for that matter makes a better car I'm done with them.
#12 of 1527
Re: Easy comparo [brightness04] by zcar3
Oct 21, 2005 (5:18 am)
Reply

Replying to: brightness04 (Oct 20, 2005 10:54 pm)

IS350 actually has the fastest automatic out there. Not even close. By far the best auto transmission in this general level of car is the DSG available in the Audi A3, TT, VW Jetta GLI, etc.
 
As far as ventilated seats - what is the word on them? Do they really work? I ask because IMO they look extremely cheap - they make a nice leather seat look like pleather. Now if they really functioned as advertised it may be worth it...
#13 of 1527
Re: Reliability [g17] by tyorder1
Oct 21, 2005 (6:13 am)
Reply

Replying to: g17 (Oct 21, 2005 4:50 am)

Amen! Whats the point of having the "Ultimate Driving Machine" if its broken down on the side of the road. Reliability for me is key. Give me a Japanese car any day of the year. So if the Lexus IS is 2nd best then I'm okay with that. As long as I pass the BMW on the side of the road while their waiting for that great road side assistance! Go ahead get your overpriced broken prone vehicle from BMW. Go on now. Make a smart financial decision.
#14 of 1527
Re: Reliability [tyorder1] by zcar3
Oct 21, 2005 (7:51 am)
Reply

Replying to: tyorder1 (Oct 21, 2005 6:13 am)

Reliability is a huge issue for almost everyone, and Lexus has certainly earned their reputation as among the best - probably the actual best - auto for reliability.
 
What I don't have a good handle on is BMW reliability. Annecdotal evidence of BMWs seen on the road side are just that - annecdotal. I'm looking at both of these cars and reliability is without a doubt an issue. I've found some interesting info: the JD Powers Initial Quality Study for 2005 had Lexus first (of around 20 manufacturers), with 81 problems per 100 vehicles. BWM third with 95, while the idustry average was 118. (Full story and graph: http://www.jdpa.com/news/releases/pressrelease.asp?ID=2005069) According to this, yes, the Lexus is more reliable, but the difference is small.
 
But there has to be more information out there than just this. Does anyone have good sources of reliability information on these cars? I realize both the new IS and 3-series are too new though, so we'll have to settle for the previous models...
#15 of 1527
Re: Reliability [g17] by ivan_99
Oct 21, 2005 (7:59 am)
Reply

Replying to: g17 (Oct 21, 2005 4:50 am)

I suspect this reliability difference may close; when comparing the new IS to the 3.
 
The reason Lexus has a better reliability is because they are never driven aggressively…because either they can’t or you wouldn’t want to.
 
The new IS should change this trend.
 
As I recall the previous GS has a reliability rating worse than the rest of the Lexus family…because it was driven “a little more” aggressively.
 
From my own personal experience I’ve never seen a Lexus pushed over 2K rpm. I usually get stuck behind these people.
 
I still think reliability is related to demographics…with Lexus covering the geriatrics club. The couch analogy comes in here. Give a similar couch to a frat house, and give one to grandma. Drawing a conclusion about the couch’s reliability wouldn’t make sense in this situation, but for auto’s we do it all the time.
#16 of 1527
Re: Reliability [tyorder1] by texasmerq
Oct 21, 2005 (7:59 am)
Reply

Replying to: tyorder1 (Oct 21, 2005 6:13 am)

Hmmm... let's see. Every car company has some cars sitting on the side of the road Lexus included. It's not just a European and American car issue. All Japanese cars are not flawless and I refuse to believe such. As for BMW's reliability overall I won't go as far to say they have a better overall track record as Lexus but I KNOW it's not as bad as you all are claiming. If it were how would they still be in business? Case in point I have a 1998 Chevy Malibu as one of my cars that has 140,000 miles on it with never a problem outside of routine maintenance, 1 alternator change earlier this year, 2 belt changes as precaution and 1 battery replacement everything else is original equipment. If I were to believe what people believe because of joke magazine's like Consumer Reports then none of this would have been possible.
 
So like why I'm going to have to believe that every manufacturer has the ability to make a great trouble-free car the same way they can make a dud. Oh and as far as Mercedes reliability my mom and my sister both have them. neither one of them never have a problem with theirs. All they do is routine maintenance. There goes your theory there too. That's just the honest truth though when all is said and done.
#17 of 1527
zcar by blueguydotcom
Oct 21, 2005 (8:00 am)
Reply
The BMW 3 won't leave you stranded. It's more like weird niggling things will go wrong with the car.
#18 of 1527
Re: Easy comparo [zcar3] by texasmerq
Oct 21, 2005 (8:07 am)
Reply

Replying to: zcar3 (Oct 21, 2005 5:18 am)

Despite what the Lexus engineers claim, The Lexus IS AT is nowhere near as fast as a Ferrari F1. The fact that anyone could possibly believe this is a clear indication that someone is drinking too much Lexus juice. As AT go it is one of the better ones overall that I have tried, but it is not even in the same league with a sequential manual transmission when it comes to shift speeds. You should go out this weekend and try an A3 or M3 to see the difference before making those transmission claims. If you decide to go though make sure you drive the car really fast so you can see and appreciate the difference.
#19 of 1527
Re: Easy comparo [texasmerq] by zcar3
Oct 21, 2005 (8:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: texasmerq (Oct 21, 2005 8:07 am)

hi texasmerg - i completely agree with you (the italicized quote was what i was reponding to - someone else's statement that the IS auto as being the fastest). I drove the A3 with DSG and it was a blast. As someone that would never seiously consider an auto tranny, I have to admit that one made me think about it. It was fun! Too bad Audi won't sell the 2.0T A3 w/ quattro. That engine just overpowers the FWD...
 
On the other hand, I didn't experience that level of fun excitement driving the IS 250 (AWD auto). It downshifted slowly and wasn't nearly as light feeling. Audi needs the 2.0T Quattro model...

Messages Page 2 of 153
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
153
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement