Sign In Join 



Land Rover Range Rover/Sport Prices Paid and Buying Experience

334 messages,  Last post on Nov 01, 2009 at 11:05 AM

You are in the Prices Paid: Buying & Leasing Experiences Forum. Your Hosts are car_man & kyfdx

What is this discussion about? Land Rover Range Rover Sport, Land Rover Range Rover, SUV


Messages Page 2 of 34
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
34
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#7 of 334
Re: RRS Deals [sam818] by british_rover
Nov 01, 2005 (7:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: sam818 (Nov 01, 2005 7:49 am)

He must have edited that in after I read it because I did not read anything in the post about house when I read it initialy.
 
$14,000 a year sucks but that is how it goes for these heavy vehicles. We took in a 2003 Mercedes S55AMG in trade a month or so ago. It was 110,000 something dollars new the best we could give was $77,000 and it only had 15k miles. Thats just the way it is.
#8 of 334
Re: RRS Deals [british_rover] by roverguy76
Nov 01, 2005 (11:40 am)
Reply

Replying to: british_rover (Nov 01, 2005 7:56 am)

I am going to give you some advice.
 
I have owned nothing but Land Rovers for 12 years. I have had 2 Range Rovers, 2 Discoverys, and now an LR3 HSE. All were purchased new from a Land Rover dealership. I have had the same salesperson for the past 12 years. The reason I continue to purchase from him is not because he is the only guy in town who sells these cars. In fact, there are 3 other dealerships in the general area. I am a repeat customer because he is a gentleman. He is kind, he is honest, and he is in no way condescending. If you want to gain a solid customer base, and bring in new customers, you should adopt some of those qualities.
 
Just some advice.
 
Dr. D
#9 of 334
Re: RRS Deals [roverguy76] by beamer530
Nov 01, 2005 (5:08 pm)
Reply

Replying to: roverguy76 (Nov 01, 2005 11:40 am)

Well said, Dr. D. Many luxury car dealers have been singing this familiar song lately: the car is hot, I don't have enough of them, so I can't negotiate. On the surface, it may sound logical, but in reality it is just another cheasy way to fool the customer. Not any more decent than low-balling or any other traditional tacky approach. And, honestly, british_rover, it insults my intelligence. I see how this "explanation" may work on someone who doesn't want to or can't wait another day to get the vehicle. Of course, we live in the country and age of instant gratification, that's why dealers really have been getting away with this trick. Here's something to think about, folks. If you walk away without buying a car, the dealer loses. Period. (By buying I also mean agreeing to order a car if it's not currently on the lot.) If he claims that he can sell the same kind of car to the next guy who walks in for more money than you offer, fine. The only difference is that by the end of the day he will have sold one car less than he could have! He may make a $6K profit on the other guy, but if you hadn't walked, he would have made his 6K plus, say, the 3K you were willing to pay him over his cost for the ADDITIONAL car you would have ordered. So, he's lost a sale and some extra $3K. Now, tell me he doesn't care??? Nonsense! The longer you let them talk, the more rubbish they will tell you that you don't need to know. Just leave them your number and the price you are willing to pay (about 5% over the invoice is absolutely fair for both sides.) Tell them to call you when they are having a slow day/week, or could use one extra sale towards that bonus in the end of the month... Remember that they want to sell you a car, they need to make money, and they are not doing you any favors. Everything else would be a lie.You can't blame a man for trying to make a maximum profit, but you won't get my money if you are greedy to the point that you insult me. Here, we are talking about mass-produced Range Rovers, not some limited edition of 50 cars that can't be replenished. Especially with [mass-produced] luxury cars, the demand cannot possibly exceed the production capability of the manufacturer. That means that Land Rover will be happy to ship to your dealer as many cars as the dealer can sell. If the dealer refuses to negotiate, walk away - but mean it. C'mon, no one desperately NEEDS a range rover this very second, you can wait a bit. On the other hand, if you are dying to get the car as soon as possible, then, of course, you may have no choice...
#10 of 334
Chicagoland buying experiences... by plisken1
Nov 01, 2005 (5:28 pm)
Reply
Hello. I am new to the RR forum. Has anyone had any buying experiences with a Chicagoland dealer in regards to the RR sport? Or, the surrounding area? Looking for a Supercharged model. Any recommendations? Thank you.
#11 of 334
Re: RRS Deals [streetbeast] by mgreene
Nov 09, 2005 (2:09 am)
Reply

Replying to: streetbeast (Oct 31, 2005 6:04 pm)

You are so typical....do not want to pay the dealer anything for his and want all the money in the world for yours. That is truly "vodoo economics."
 
And that is not a knock against you by the way, I am much the same way. It's just that when I think of it in objective terms it's funny because I realise what I and most automotive consumers want to do is economically not feasible in the long run.
#12 of 334
Taking The Plunge by acole10000
Nov 09, 2005 (3:57 am)
Reply
I am signing the papers today, RS w/ Lux, Sat, PTI rubber mats, rubber loadspace mat and cargo cover.- $57,500. This is the GM's car w/ 1,000 miles on it(not titled). comments on pricing are appreciated.
  
Has anyone got the info on the Motorola V710 PTI Cradle.
#13 of 334
Re: RRS Deals [streetbeast] by beamer530
Nov 09, 2005 (9:04 am)
Reply

Replying to: streetbeast (Oct 31, 2005 6:04 pm)

The invoice for RRS w/lux pkg is $54,205. The price they give you right away is just over 58K. And they will tell you that they won't go down. Considering that the dealer gets incentives from the manufacturer, the dealer's profit in this case is guaranteed to be over $4-5K. Possibly, significantly more. Can't blame him for trying. He's in business for profit. However, if you are truly willing to wait, or to consider other cars/dealers, there is always a risk for the dealer to make $0.00 on you instead. If he's smart enough to sense that this particular customer is NOT coming back, he will make the only right decision and agree for a lower price. Otherwise, his cockiness will cost him dearly... but that's his problem, isn't it?
#14 of 334
Re: RRS Deals [beamer530] by british_rover
Nov 11, 2005 (7:36 am)
Reply

Replying to: beamer530 (Nov 09, 2005 9:04 am)

Actually depending on if the sport has the LUX option or the LX1 option the invoice is different. Those are two different packages and all sports ordered from around July on have the LX1 package.
 
I will tell you honestly there are no incentives or rebates on the Sport at all. No super secret factory to dealer only incentives and no subvened lease or subvened interest rates either. Land Rover does not need to offer any incentives on this car at least not yet.
#15 of 334
Re: RRS Deals [british_rover] by gocart2
Nov 30, 2005 (3:39 pm)
Reply

Replying to: british_rover (Nov 01, 2005 6:53 am)

British Rover, I think your comments on this site are pretty fascinating. As everyone knows Land Rover is part of Ford. Ford, as a company, is in absolutely horrible shape. Part of the reason Ford and its premium brand group (Rover, Volvo, Jag) are in such trouble is that first and foremost your cars have lots and lots of problems. I bot a Volvo S60R and it spent half of the first three months I owned it in the shop (at which point I sold it). A friend of mine just paid $69k for a decked out RR Sport; he has owned the car for four weeks, it has been back to the dealer twice already for a total of 8 days. Go read the customer reviews on Edmunds - people love the Sport's aesthetic but talk about the intermittent behavior of the car's electronics, problems with steering columns and engines that wont start.
 
So here you are talking about how you have some customer who you rip off on a regular basis by underpaying him for his perfect trade-ins and then making $7k. That's nice you have that customer.
  
But the sad truth of the matter is that aside from quality, one of the reasons Ford & GM continue to lose US market share is that people like you treat customers really poorly. When I spend $70k on a car I expect a) the vehicle to operate properly and b) be treated courteously by the person who sells it to me. My experiences at Lexus and BMW have always been stellar.
 
In the RR Sport, you essentially have the first truly "hot" car Rover has released in a while. Instead of capitalizing on the demand for the vehicle as an opportunity to bring customers into your dealership, show them you are a fair and helpful franchise and effectively recruit them to be long term Rover customers, you sound condescending and dismissive and seem happy to take as much short term profit from the sport as you can; effectively ensuring that many of your customers and the people who read this board know the buying experience will be a negative one.
 
This is exactly why Lexus/Toyota continues to take market share. No matter how short supply the vehicle, they are always polite and fair.
 
Enjoy the Sport's current sales. Like someone else on the site indicated, its only a matter of time before supply catches up, the quality problems become ever more well documented and soon you will be offering all kinds of financing to get people through your doors.
 
I think I need to go check out the Lexus LX470 now. Thanks for bringing me to my senses!
#16 of 334
Rover vs Lexus by hvf
Nov 30, 2005 (5:34 pm)
Reply
Thanks for your comments gocart2. I agree and I'll by looking into GX470 too.

Messages Page 2 of 34
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
34
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement