- #1 of 35
-
Chrysler 300 or Nissan Maxima?
by retroeric
-
Oct 03, 2005 (8:55 pm)
-
|
|
Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
|
- #2 of 35
-
Re: Chrysler 300 or Nissan Maxima? [retroeric]
by merc1
-
Oct 04, 2005 (12:22 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: retroeric (Oct 03, 2005 8:55 pm)
I just spent a few days cross shopping these two cars with a friend. However I think we need to know a little bit more about what you're looking for. While competitors, these two cars do have some differences.
M
|
- #3 of 35
-
Re: Chrysler 300 or Nissan Maxima? [merc1]
by retroeric
-
Oct 04, 2005 (10:43 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: merc1 (Oct 04, 2005 12:22 am)
Not sure what I want yet. My opinion to narrow down to these two cars (as well as a few others not mentioned) are based strictly on cosmetics, and high praise from respected publications. I hope to test drive both this weekend.
But in your opinion, what do you think are the pros and cons of each car? I'd like to have an idea of what to look out for while I am testing them.
|
- #4 of 35
-
Re: Chrysler 300 or Nissan Maxima? [retroeric]
by pat HOST
-
Oct 04, 2005 (12:33 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: retroeric (Oct 04, 2005 10:43 am)
What are you looking for, what are your priorities?
Maybe another way to ask this is to ask you what qualities have gotten you to focus on these two vehicles?
|
- #5 of 35
-
Re: Chrysler 300 or Nissan Maxima? [pat]
by retroeric
-
Oct 04, 2005 (4:56 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: pat (Oct 04, 2005 12:33 pm)
The only thing that has drawn me to these two are the body styles and the rave reviews from motortrend. As for qualities, I want a big, safe but stylish sedan, V6, good acceleration, around 3.0 to 3.5 hp, smooth and quiet ride, respectable on fuel economy, one that has been redesigned not too long ago so it's not due for another redesign for a good 4 or 5 years. Preferable under $30,000. Both these cars seem to fit these descriptions.
I know bottom line is I have to test drive them, but I'd like to hear some pros and cons of each before I go test drive so I know what to look out for ahead of time.
|
- #6 of 35
-
V6?
by kevm14
-
Oct 05, 2005 (3:47 am)
-
|
|
So you'd be considering the V6 300? Like a Touring or Limited? It has been my opinion (of course without driving any) that if you're shopping V6s, the 300 loses some of its charm. No offense to happy 300 V6 owners. I will say the Maxima will be faster than the 3.5L 300, for sure. If it's an SE, more performance oriented all around. If it's an SL, who knows.
|
- #7 of 35
-
Re: Chrysler 300 or Nissan Maxima? [retroeric]
by pat HOST
-
Oct 05, 2005 (3:56 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: retroeric (Oct 04, 2005 4:56 pm)
Be sure to look through the individual discussions on each of these vehicles as well as check out the Vehicle Detail Pages on Edmunds.com. This will give you additional information to process while we have this conversation here.
|
- #8 of 35
-
Re: Chrysler 300 or Nissan Maxima? [retroeric]
by 300lover
-
Oct 05, 2005 (1:50 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: retroeric (Oct 03, 2005 8:55 pm)
Considering no one has answered your question, let me put in my 2 cents worth. I don't know much about the Nissan Maxima, so most of my comments will focus on the 300 because I own one. I currently have a Cool Vanilla 300 Touring (but with all of the packages available that make it the equivalent of a limited, including the wheels) that I purchased in mid July here in Canada. Style - For distinctiveness, nothing in the price range will turn someones head faster. I would think that most would agree, the 300 beats the Maxima (and many other cars on the road today) in the style category. Power - considering the Maxima is a little lighter and available with a similar sized engine, I'd give the edge to the Maxima. BUT, you won't be dissapointed with the power available in the 300. Quick acceleration that pulls all the way up to 100km/h, and beyond. Mileage - above average. In Canada, it's rated at 35 miles per imperial gallon highway (which is a little larger than a US gallon). I'm usually getting 32 mpg, and almost all (95%) of my mileage is highway. Close enough, considering how unrealistic these fuel economy tests are. Comfort - amazing. I have driven 4.5 hrs nonstop (450 km or 270 miles) and I was still comfortable. Lots of legroom, soft touch materials, etc...It is quiet, especially at speed on the highway, although the Goodyear Integrity tires that came with it are somewhat loud, but thats the tire, not the car. Longevity - this car isn't due for a re-design/freshening until 2009 or 2010, according to Chrysler. I'm not knocking the Nissan. It's a good car. I just think, for me, the 300 is better. Anyway, thats my opinion.But as others have said, you'll need to test drive them both to be able to make an informed decision.
|
- #9 of 35
-
Re: Chrysler 300 or Nissan Maxima? [retroeric]
by abe
-
Oct 08, 2005 (3:33 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: retroeric (Oct 03, 2005 8:55 pm)
if you're comparing the v6 version of the 300 vs the maxima then for size and comfort go for the chrysler. if performance is important go for the maxima.
|
- #10 of 35
-
Re: Chrysler 300 or Nissan Maxima? [300lover]
by beaug
-
Oct 30, 2005 (8:14 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: 300lover (Oct 05, 2005 1:50 pm)
Advise you to look up the Shimmy Issue with 2004-2005 Maxima SE - Nissan Buying back my 2004... Great looks, poor execution. Looking at the 300c myself once i surrender my car to nissan an the buy back is done.
|
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans 
