You are here:
Forums
Hatchbacks
Nissan Versa
Nissan Versa

1196 messages, Last post on Nov 11, 2009 at 8:58 PM
You are in the Nissan Versa Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer
|
Well the most recent JD Power Vehicle Dependability Study from 2006 which measures problems after 3 years puts Nissan at 21st place with 242 problems per 100 vehicles and well off the average of 227. Ford came in above average at 224 and Mercury came in 2nd with 151! Toyota was 5th with 179. Yes, thats 18% more problems in a 3 year old Toyota vs. a 3 year old Mercury. I'm not trying to bash Nissan or the Versa in general. I am just trying to keep conversation about the strenghts and weakness of Versa as a car and not about how bad american cars are. There are no recalls on 2005 to 2007 Focus. As for whether the Power tests mean anything, I think that the difference between brands is significate. Mark Mark
|
|
|
|
|
"As for whether the Power tests mean anything, I think that the difference between brands is significate." It's what/how J.D. measures that's at issue. GIGO. Garbage in, garbage out. J.D.'s customers are the auto companies. They need to tailor their data to make it appealing to their customers. They do that extremely well. David |
|
|
Replying to: mschmal (Jul 21, 2007 6:18 am) Ford is deffinitly on the right track, but only time will tell. So far ford is doing very well in both inital and 3 year reliablitly. If, the cars also hold up well after 5-10 years, ford may once again be able to challenge the asian companies. But, that particular reliablity study was conducted on 2002 year vehicles, across all vehicle classes, not a particular vehicle, or vehicle class. I would suspect the focus is well below FoMoCo's average as a company. nissan has redesigned all its vehicles since then, and the versa was 5 years away from comming out. |
|
|
lets see, 242 vs. 227 per 100. That means if you had 100 cars, only 15 more would have a problem. Or on a particular car, it you have .15 more problems! What I am getting at is that just because a brand is farther down the list, doesn't mean that it is unreliable in abstract terms.
|
|
|
Replying to: stickguy (Jul 21, 2007 9:43 am) I'm not badmouthing ford, they've made enormous improvements in quality, and are finnaly begging to match (or even exceed) that of their asin competition. Just don't read too much into those relability ratings, they only tell 1/10th of the story. |
|
|
its problems per 100 cars. on average each Nissan had 24.2 problems over the 3 years. A problem is anything a customer dislikes enough to report. The mechanical failure, "Bad" fuel economy, cheap feel to the knobs, whatever. It is important to car makers because it measures how well that car maker is meeting the expectations of its customers as well as how reliable the cars are. Mark
|
|
|
|
|
Toyota was pointing forward to but the argument was also made that Toyota didn't want Scion xA buyers buying the 5-door Toyota Yaris hatch/crossover. Either argument makes sense to me and answers the question. Still there's a certain segment of people who love the Yaris 5-door design and wanted that particular car model. Not the other Toyota designs. It's as simple as that and remains a disappointment for them. |
|
|
Replying to: mschmal (Jul 23, 2007 9:27 am) I do grant that CR's tables do not really show a weighting per se, either, but at least you generally know what problems they are reporting on (engine, transmission, electrical, brakes, etc.). |
|
|
Replying to: mschmal (Jul 23, 2007 9:27 am) correct. so if nissan has 242 problems per 100 cars, that averages out to 2.4 problems per car. not 24.2 basically what its saying is, if nissan sells 100 vehicles, then they can expect 242 problems. not 2,400. |
|
You are here:
Forums
Hatchbacks
Nissan Versa
Nissan Versa
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Nissan Versa



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats