Sign In Join 



Pontiac Solstice vs 2006 Mazda MX-5 Miata

376 messages,  Last post on Jan 17, 2008 at 3:20 PM

You are in the Pontiac Solstice Forum. Your Host is claires

What is this discussion about? Pontiac Solstice, Mazda MX-5 Miata, Coupe, Convertible


Messages Page 23 of 38
1
...
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
...
38
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#221 of 376
Re: Cheap Thrills Comparo Consumer Reports [aviboy97] by pao
May 12, 2006 (3:51 am)
Reply

Replying to: aviboy97 (May 11, 2006 10:01 am)

agree...the miata has a 15 plus year history of refinements....wasnt the first one around 91.....so quite a heritage....Im by no means knocking it...we test drove both.....MX-5 and Solstice...and opted for the Solstice...Im not an Auto-X guy.......just wanted a nice roadster for her and I to cruise in...we both liked the solstice...personal choice.......
 
we were aware of the sol's "shortcomings" but that did not sway our decision after we compared the two...7 months and 8300 miles into our ownership....we are still very happy with the solstice..
 
and it is our fair weather car.....backed by an 04 Chevy Malibu Maxx...which has been trashed at times with reviews..but ours as 67K on it two years old..and not one problem....along with our 96 Ford Bronco..with 167k and still going strong....
 
any car will and can offer up it share of problems, regardless of make, model or price...and the forum here and elsewhere provides a voice for those that have those problems and probably are in the minority....the silent majority are happy with their cars and enjoy them for what they are....cars......
 
cheers all
#222 of 376
Re: Cheap Thrills Comparo Consumer Reports [pao] by aviboy97
May 12, 2006 (7:11 am)
Reply

Replying to: pao (May 12, 2006 3:51 am)

As I stated in my earlier post, as long as you are happy with your purchase, that is all that really counts. You seem to be a happy Sol owner, and really, that's what it's all about. Enjoy!
#223 of 376
Re: Since we are looking at ratings/comparisons [aviboy97] by carlisimo
May 12, 2006 (9:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: aviboy97 (May 11, 2006 10:20 am)

"I also found my answer to what "initial quality" means. It is the car rated in the first 90 days of ownership. 90 days?? You would think quality would have to take a bit longer then 90 days to show. Perhaps 2-5 years maybe? Just my opinion. "
 
I think initial quality has to do with how well a car looks like it's been put together, and purposely excludes durability. Gaps, loose items, maybe unergonomic design features. Stuff that sucks right off the production line - so I'd say it measures design more than what quality of materials was used.
 
The Mazda3 had a lot of complaints on initial quality because the A/C was weaker than some people wanted. Cupholders have hurt German cars' scores.
#224 of 376
Re: Since we are looking at ratings/comparisons [aviboy97] by logic1
May 12, 2006 (12:49 pm)
Reply

Replying to: aviboy97 (May 11, 2006 9:53 am)

I've always thought J.D Powers was on GM's bank roll.
 
Well, GM ought to sue them then.
 
Per Pao's link, while some GM brands do well, others, including GM's bread and butter Chevrolet, are below industry average.
 
On the other hand, many major GM competitors are above average.
 
Mazda lost in a fair fight, IMO. In deference to the Miata, Mazda's probably gets hit real hard for the rotary engine.
 
The problems I had with my '03 Miata were electonics and quality of the interior components. Everything looked nice enough, but the gear shift thread stripped (first time I ever had that happen) and the center console and glove box latch snapped.
 
The 6th speed at least in the NB Miata was a superfluous waste of money. The older engine did not need the extra gear. Better off saving the money on the 6 speed to spend after market.
 
I've not driven the NC MX-5. Maybe the new engine better matches the 6 speed.
#225 of 376
Re: Since we are looking at ratings/comparisons [logic1] by aviboy97
May 12, 2006 (1:03 pm)
Reply

Replying to: logic1 (May 12, 2006 12:49 pm)

Well, GM ought to sue them then.
  
Per Pao's link, while some GM brands do well, others, including GM's bread and butter Chevrolet, are below industry average.
 

 
All I meant was they throw a little money to J.D. and have some of their vehicles rate well....once again, I have no proof! LOL, just my thought.
#226 of 376
Mazda vs Pontiac vs Saturn by glennglenn
May 17, 2006 (6:52 pm)
Reply
I still insist that the Mazda is a chicks car!! Always has been, always will be. Great car, great handling, never enough power BUT still a chicks car. Mazda dropped the ball on this car 16 years ago with me when they allowed dealers to gouge new customers with BUMP stickers. Now, GM dealers (Saturn included) are appearing to do the same. Go ahead, chase me away, I'll be looking at the Japanese cars even more GM. Hasta Nunca.
#227 of 376
Re: Mazda vs Pontiac vs Saturn [glennglenn] by audia8q
May 18, 2006 (7:14 am)
Reply

Replying to: glennglenn (May 17, 2006 6:52 pm)

Mazda dropped the ball on this car 16 years ago with me when they allowed dealers to gouge new customers with BUMP stickers
 
During those 16 years the Miata become the best selling roadster in history. Doesn't exactly sound like they missed your sale. During the next 16 years the Solstice will not top the Miata's numbers. They are instock and getting discounted already in many markets...so GM might really miss your sale. Don't sweat the bump stickers.
#228 of 376
Re: Mazda vs Pontiac vs Saturn [audia8q] by logic1
May 18, 2006 (8:06 am)
Reply

Replying to: audia8q (May 18, 2006 7:14 am)

They are instock and getting discounted already in many markets...so GM might really miss your sale. Don't sweat the bump stickers.
 
In your dreams.
 
GM is even planning to increase production to meet demand.
#229 of 376
Re: Mazda vs Pontiac vs Saturn [logic1] by audia8q
May 18, 2006 (10:24 am)
Reply

Replying to: logic1 (May 18, 2006 8:06 am)

You need to check around...the pontiac dealer near me isnt holding msrp. Don't forget, dealer orders are different than retail orders. The Mazda3 is sold out for dealer orders too but that doenst mean you can't get one...
#230 of 376
Re: Mazda vs Pontiac vs Saturn [glennglenn] by rorr
May 18, 2006 (11:08 am)
Reply

Replying to: glennglenn (May 17, 2006 6:52 pm)

"Mazda dropped the ball on this car 16 years ago with me when they allowed dealers to gouge new customers with BUMP stickers."
 
Perhaps you don't know what MSRP stands for?
 
Manufacturer's SUGGESTED Retail Price.
 
Why is the price 'gouging'? Was anyone holding a gun to your head MAKING you buy a Miata 16 years ago? I don't think Pontiac dealers are kidnapping folks off the street and threatening to break their legs if they don't buy a Solstice at MSRP+ADM.
 
If you don't like the price, don't buy the car. It's that simple. If someone has a large amount of green in their pocket and simply HAS to have a Solstice (or Sky or Mustang GT convertible or whatever the latest 'hot' car is), why shouldn't the Dealer charge MSRP+ADM for the car?
 
Which is better: having a dealer WITH some inventory actually available but at MSRP+ADM, OR having a dealer who ONLY sells at MSRP (or below) but has no inventory? And a 6 month waiting list of folks wanting whatever the hot car is?
 
There's no right or wrong answer to that question. You are certainly within your right to ONLY buy from dealers selling at MSRP or below......and get on a waiting list.
 
Doesn't anyone know the basic BASIC rules of supply and demand anymore?

Messages Page 23 of 38
1
...
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
...
38
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement