Sign In Join 



Pontiac Solstice vs 2006 Mazda MX-5 Miata

376 messages,  Last post on Jan 17, 2008 at 3:20 PM

You are in the Pontiac Solstice Forum. Your Host is claires

What is this discussion about? Pontiac Solstice, Mazda MX-5 Miata, Coupe, Convertible


Messages Page 23 of 39
1
...
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
...
39
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#214 of 376
Re: Cheap Thrills Comparo Consumer Reports [aviboy97] by pao
May 11, 2006 (4:16 am)
Reply

Replying to: aviboy97 (May 09, 2006 9:51 am)

I have a solstice...and here is the CR review..I knew all the shortcomings...and still bought and love this car.....their gas mileage eval would have been better if they had used the right fuel....prem is recommended not regular,,we are averaging 27 MPG ........I would also say most Sol owners dont use this car as their every day car......I think this is a fair review..but has some shortcomings it....I dont use CR to buy a car anyway....a toaster perhaps maybe!!..there are many points I could contradict in his review, but the only way to is to sit in one..drive one....and enjoy this roadster......did it bring more folks into the roadster market..and probably drawn more in to the MX-5.....yes it did....and all I can say..is welcome....cheers
 
THE SOLSTICE LINE
Body style Convertible
Drive wheels Rear
Trim lines
Engine & transmissions
2,4-liter 4 (177 hp); 5-speed manual,
5-speed automatic
Base price
$19915
Pontiac Solstice
HIGHS I Handling, headlights, styling.
LOWS I Noisy engine, gear ratios, controls and displays,
top operation, luggage space, visibility.
 
The Pontiac Solstice has sleek looks but is disappointing as a sports car. It handles well and has a firm, but reasonable ride. Despite quick acceleration times at the track, poorly chosen gear ratios and an unpleasant sounding engine that doesn’t like to rev affect drivability Notable wind noise, a cumbersome folding top, poor top-up visibility and scant interior and trunk storage space make it a hard car to live with every day The Solstice and its near-twin, the Saturn Sky are new vehicles, so reliability is unknown.
 
THE DRIVING EXPERIENCE
The Solstice handles well with controlled body lean. But it is some 400 pounds heavier than the Miata and not nearly as nimble. The steering has appropriate weight, but could be quicker The Solstice posted a good speed in our avoidance maneuver, but tended to oversteer. Stability control is not offered.
The Solstice’s ride is firm but not punishing. Pronounced wind noise and engine thrash drown out any road noise.
It takes a lot of coaxing to get the 177-hp, 2,4-liter four- cylinder engine to perform. The five-speed transmission has large gaps between gears that stifle performance.
The Solstice returned 23 mpg overall on regular fuel,
Braking performance was very good overall
. The halogen low-beam and high-beam headlights both illuminate a very good distance ahead.
 
INSIDE THE CABIN
The stylized interior has expanses of hard plastics and flimsy details. The wide center console and the door rob the driver of leg room. The steering wheel tilts but does not telescope, and it blocks the view of the speedometer, tachometer, and fuel gauge for some drivers.
The top and the humps on the rear deck lid block rear visibility and the top blocks the view to the sides in front. Short drivers have trouble seeing out from the low seats, which are unsupportive on long trips. You have to duck under the top to enter.
Most major controls are easy to use. But door locks, power window controls, and the seat recline knob are difficult or impossible to reach whlle driving.
There is no place inside to put a map or cell phone where the driver can reach them. You have to get out of the car and open the trunk to fold or erect the top. Opening the trunk requires releasing the roof buttresses, Likewise, closing the trunk requires going to both sides of the car to release the buttresses.
 
SAFETY NOTES
There is no spare tire, but there is a repair kit. Sidewall and other major tire damage require roadside assistance. Integral head restraints are tall enough for safety.
Driving with kids.
It’s not recommended that children ride in roadsters, but a sensing system will shut off the air bag when a child is seated in the passenger seat. There are no LATCH anchors, but child seats should be secure in the passenger seat.
 
OUT OF REACH
The flimsy cup holders in the bulkhead are too far back for the driver to easily qrab an item placed in them. There is also no front storaqe area for items such as maps, wallets, or cell phones.
SCANT STORAGE SPACE
With the Solstice’s top up, the poorly shaped trunk held a few slim backpacks but none of our soft-sided luqqaqe
#215 of 376
Since we are looking at ratings/comparisons by pao
May 11, 2006 (7:34 am)
Reply
Looks like Mazda as a whole is pretty much at the bottom
 
May 11, 2006
 
Results from the 2005 J.D. Power Initial Quality Survey for new vehicles.
 
Score is the number of problems reported per 100 vehicles.
 
BRAND SCORE
Lexus 81
Jaguar 88
BMW 95
Buick 100
Cadillac 104
Mercedes-Benz 104
Toyota 105
Audi 106
Infiniti 109
HUMMER 110
Hyundai 110
Honda 112
GMC 113
Lincoln 113
Acura 116
INDUSTRY AVERAGE 118
Jeep 120
Mercury 120
Nissan 120
Chrysler 121
Chevrolet 127
Ford 127
Mitsubishi 129
Pontiac 129
Dodge 130
MINI 130
Scion 134
Saab 136
Saturn 136
Subaru 138
Kia 140
Volvo 140
Porsche 147
Volkswagen 147
Land Rover 149
Mazda 149
Suzuki 151
 
Source: J.D. Power and Associates
 
its all a personal choice....do your research, visit, drive, and decide......cheers
#216 of 376
Re: Since we are looking at ratings/comparisons [pao] by aviboy97
May 11, 2006 (9:53 am)
Reply

Replying to: pao (May 11, 2006 7:34 am)

Looks like Mazda as a whole is pretty much at the bottom
  
May 11, 2006
  
Results from the 2005 J.D. Power Initial Quality Survey for new vehicles.
 

 
What does "initial quality" mean anyway?? Does it mean "this car looks great NOW, but it won't 3 years from now"?? Mazda as a company put's out a higher quality vehicle then a Pontiac. This is obvious once you sit in one. Also, Mazda has a much better reputation for reliability. I just don't get it.
 
J.D. Powers also rated the 2005 Chevy Malibu "most reliable" it it's class as well as the Cadillac SRX "best in class"....interesting
 
J.D. Powers also rated 3 GM production plants as the the best. What the heck does that have to do with anything? Does that mean? They are clean? Happy workers? New robot's to build their vehicles?
 
I've always thought J.D Powers was on GM's bank roll. Just my thought, I have no proof to back it up. I do not hold J.D. Powers to any high standard. Just as many do not listen to CR.
#217 of 376
Re: Cheap Thrills Comparo Consumer Reports [pao] by aviboy97
May 11, 2006 (10:01 am)
Reply

Replying to: pao (May 11, 2006 4:16 am)

At least you are happy with your decision. That's really all that count's if you think about it. We can sit here and talk about who's car is better all day, but as long as you are happy with your purchase, that is all the counts.
 
I just wanted to mention the latest CR article, since this is a Solstice Vs MX-5 forum.
 
You have to give GM credit where credit is due, they did built a very popular, hard to get vehicle.
 
I happen to agree with you about not driving the car everyday. Most people drive the MX-5, as well as the Solstice, as a second vehicle, or fair weather car. There are some that drive it everyday.
 
If you think about it, there is no perfect car, even though CR seem's to think Toyota/Lexus are perfect.
#218 of 376
Re: Since we are looking at ratings/comparisons [aviboy97] by aviboy97
May 11, 2006 (10:20 am)
Reply

Replying to: aviboy97 (May 11, 2006 9:53 am)

I decided to take a trip to J.D. Power's web site. It did not have any data for most of the Mazda vehicles in 2005 or 2006. I wonder how they rate Mazda so low if there is no information to base it on.
 
I also found my answer to what "initial quality" means. It is the car rated in the first 90 days of ownership. 90 days?? You would think quality would have to take a bit longer then 90 days to show. Perhaps 2-5 years maybe? Just my opinion.
#219 of 376
lets look deeper.... by audia8q
May 11, 2006 (1:36 pm)
Reply
If we look deeper and single out the Miata, which is the topic of this thread....the result will show that the Miata is one of the most reliable cars built today...not just vs. roadsters but compared to all cars.
#220 of 376
Re: lets look deeper.... [audia8q] by aviboy97
May 11, 2006 (2:24 pm)
Reply

Replying to: audia8q (May 11, 2006 1:36 pm)

yes, stats do not lie. For the 2004 model year, only 5 out of 100 MX-5 owners reported any problem. That's astonishing. You cannot dispute the strong reliability history of the MX-5.
#221 of 376
Re: Cheap Thrills Comparo Consumer Reports [aviboy97] by pao
May 12, 2006 (3:51 am)
Reply

Replying to: aviboy97 (May 11, 2006 10:01 am)

agree...the miata has a 15 plus year history of refinements....wasnt the first one around 91.....so quite a heritage....Im by no means knocking it...we test drove both.....MX-5 and Solstice...and opted for the Solstice...Im not an Auto-X guy.......just wanted a nice roadster for her and I to cruise in...we both liked the solstice...personal choice.......
 
we were aware of the sol's "shortcomings" but that did not sway our decision after we compared the two...7 months and 8300 miles into our ownership....we are still very happy with the solstice..
 
and it is our fair weather car.....backed by an 04 Chevy Malibu Maxx...which has been trashed at times with reviews..but ours as 67K on it two years old..and not one problem....along with our 96 Ford Bronco..with 167k and still going strong....
 
any car will and can offer up it share of problems, regardless of make, model or price...and the forum here and elsewhere provides a voice for those that have those problems and probably are in the minority....the silent majority are happy with their cars and enjoy them for what they are....cars......
 
cheers all
#222 of 376
Re: Cheap Thrills Comparo Consumer Reports [pao] by aviboy97
May 12, 2006 (7:11 am)
Reply

Replying to: pao (May 12, 2006 3:51 am)

As I stated in my earlier post, as long as you are happy with your purchase, that is all that really counts. You seem to be a happy Sol owner, and really, that's what it's all about. Enjoy!
#223 of 376
Re: Since we are looking at ratings/comparisons [aviboy97] by carlisimo
May 12, 2006 (9:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: aviboy97 (May 11, 2006 10:20 am)

"I also found my answer to what "initial quality" means. It is the car rated in the first 90 days of ownership. 90 days?? You would think quality would have to take a bit longer then 90 days to show. Perhaps 2-5 years maybe? Just my opinion. "
 
I think initial quality has to do with how well a car looks like it's been put together, and purposely excludes durability. Gaps, loose items, maybe unergonomic design features. Stuff that sucks right off the production line - so I'd say it measures design more than what quality of materials was used.
 
The Mazda3 had a lot of complaints on initial quality because the A/C was weaker than some people wanted. Cupholders have hurt German cars' scores.

Messages Page 23 of 39
1
...
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
...
39
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement