You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Honda Civic
Honda Civic vs Volkswagen Jetta

488 messages, Last post on Mar 27, 2009 at 12:44 PM
You are in the Honda Civic Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
|
|---|---|
|
Replying to: ruking1 (Mar 07, 2007 6:24 pm) My 1996 Accord went 141k miles before ever having brake pads put on the car. I still have the orignal rear ones. It ran lots of highway miles. I'm curious if your Honda is run on the same route as the VW, your post almost makes it sound like it might be (the highway comment) or you may just drive it faster; I wasn't really clear on that.
|
|
|
Replying to: thegraduate (Mar 07, 2007 7:17 pm) Yes the daily commute is EXACTLY the same route. During the RUSH HOUR commute, it is HARD (and actually dangerous to drive one faster or slower than another. So I apologize if that was not too clear. On the brakes for sure the rears will run 125k on the Jetta. I actually think the fronts will go at least that, but am prepared to do the rotor and pad change when and if needed, as the fronts do the majority of the braking.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: ruking1 (Mar 07, 2007 7:24 pm) So, with that stated, your post seems logical. The car getting more (abuse isn't a good word) stress will be wearing faster (the Honda). Highways are a velvet pillow for a car. They stay at optimum operating temperature, you don't stop and go, you don't use the brakes (much!), and you don't corner at all. You're Jetta gets all the treadmill time, while your Civic is doing the triathalon.
|
|
|
Replying to: thegraduate (Mar 07, 2007 7:28 pm)
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: ruking1 (Mar 07, 2007 7:36 pm) If the Honda sees a higher percentage of city miles than the VW does (which is what I'm trying to figure out) then it still sort of makes sense to me. What kind of tires do you have on each, out of curiousity? I just realized I probably look like I'm grilling you. I'm not trying to be a pest, so send me an online *slap* if I need to stop!
|
|
|
Replying to: thegraduate (Mar 07, 2007 7:43 pm) Yes ULR is currently at 2.83 and diesel at 2.97. So the math would put fuel cost at 2.83/40=.07075 vs 2.97/49= .0606122. This would make the ULR 14.3% more per mile driven.
|
|
|
Replying to: ruking1 (Mar 07, 2007 7:55 pm) While sort of unrelated, BUT REALLY RELATED, another issue would be what tires to replace the Dunlop OEM's with. If one is not careful, most selections lose mpg which would partially negate why one bought a economic/economy vehicle in the first place? However it is pretty obvious, they are not long wearing in my case. When you start to take this stuff out to 250,000 -300,000 miles the consequences of the decision just jump out at you. On the other side if one is a ricer, they are probably thinking geez, what a fogie.
|
|
|
Replying to: ruking1 (Mar 08, 2007 8:19 am) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: ruking1 (Mar 07, 2007 6:24 pm) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: targettuning (Mar 08, 2007 9:24 am) It is quite simple, they were never really used for most of those miles. Before the car was handed down to me, it was driven 70 miles a day round trip on my grandmother's work commute, 31-32 miles or so of which was beltway-type interstate (I-459 in Birmingham, if you are familiar). 70 MPH speed limits, with very little traffic holdups. The car ran for 120,000 miles that way before I got it. She had them checked several times, because she just knew it would need them before then (she got the 1996 Accord only 2 years after changing where she worked - she has since retired), but they always told her approx. what percent of brake pad life was left, so she never had to get them done. That fell to me, at 141k miles. I still have the original rears, but want to get them at least looked at on my next oil change (I'm at 3,300 miles on this oil, so I'll go in very soon). The short answer for extending brake pad life? Don't use 'em!
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Honda Civic
Honda Civic vs Volkswagen Jetta
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2011 Honda Civic
2011 Volkswagen Jetta



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats