You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Honda Civic
Honda Civic vs Volkswagen Jetta

488 messages, Last post on Mar 27, 2009 at 12:44 PM
You are in the Honda Civic Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
Replying to: erickpl (Mar 06, 2007 2:18 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: erickpl (Mar 06, 2007 2:18 pm) i figured it was more this than acual consideration for crash test ratings; otherwise the civic would have been a strong contender for her. |
|
that the side impact may have been a bit higher that IIHS tests side impact. More speed with its inherently more kinetic energy may very well shove the door in to the point of contacting the center console. if it was similar to IIHS's speed, then I'd be a little more worried. i feel pretty safe in my 98 civic when compared to similar cars of that vintage.
|
|
|
Replying to: tazereli (Mar 07, 2007 9:23 am) Her impact was in a 45 MPH zone, but cars routinely go 50-65 (and sometimes higher through there). I'm being conservative when I say she was probably hit at around 55 mph. -Paul |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: erickpl (Mar 07, 2007 9:36 am) It sounds more mental than practical (although VWs are very safe, heavy cars) that she would want a different kind of car. In 1995, my grandmother was hit at 55 MPH in the passenger side of her 1991 Civic DX. She had only bruises from her seatbelt and a bump on the head from hitting the window glass. The fact that it held up so well from a hit at that speed made her want ONLY a Honda after that. The car was totaled, but she walked away. I don't say this to talk about the Civic's integrity, because that is really hard to debate on these models that aren't made anymore. I say it, to say that it is a mental thing. "This car kept me safe so I won't buy anything else" is likely as common as "I got hurt in this car so I'll never buy it again," even if a different car may have gotten them much more injured. It's not logical, but it is how we as humans work. Not saying you or your daughter are wrong in any way, just trying to give a little outsider's perspective (and just one perspective, at that). |
|
|
Replying to: thegraduate (Mar 07, 2007 9:54 am) My dad was t-boned in 04 in a Mazda 626 (pre 6) and won't drive one again, even with side bags being available (his didn't have em). My wife had an accident in 05 where her car went airborne due to excessive speed (long story), she came down and went into a phone pole that had been converted to a fence post at probably something between 50-60 mph. She walked away with no scratches, a few bruises, a sore throat (from the airbag dust), and that's it. We put her in another one just like it. I think you hit the nail on head as to why she didn't want another Honda (or Acura) - it hurt her and didn't protect her as well as it could/should have. She called me a couple of hours ago after driving to and from school, saying how much she loves her new car. She just got it yesterday and is already outside washing it. BTW my 99si was black too. NEVER AGAIN even though black cars are darn nice looking for the 5 minutes they're clean after a wash. -Paul
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: erickpl (Mar 07, 2007 10:31 am) |
|
|
Replying to: thegraduate (Mar 07, 2007 9:54 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: ruking1 (Mar 07, 2007 11:45 am) -Paul |
|
So far two consumeables on the Honda are wearing 2x faster than on the Jetta: alignment and tires. Both cars were baselined at each respective dealer when new. I needed an alignment at app 42,000 miles with the Honda. Tires while very evenly worn, do not look like they will go past 55k. The Jetta so far with 89,000 miles has not needed an alignment and the tires will probably go 120k to 130k. The Jetta is run on the highways at higher sustained speeds than the Honda.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Honda Civic
Honda Civic vs Volkswagen Jetta
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2011 Honda Civic
2011 Volkswagen Jetta



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats