Ask the Car People.SM


Buick Rendevous Real World MPG

17 messages,  Last post on Dec 22, 2009 at 7:42 PM

You are in the Buick Rendezvous Forum.

What is this discussion about? Buick Rendezvous, Fuel Efficiency (MPG), SUV

Messages Page 3 of 3

#12 of 17 Re: Fuel Mileage Drops off bad? [huckabyl] by kenym

Dec 04, 2006 (3:29 pm)

Replying to: huckabyl (Dec 03, 2006 10:59 am)
I live in North East Ohio and I believe they start using winter fuel additives around the end of October. My wife's 06 Corolla S was averaging 30+ since she bought it in May.
However since the end of October her mileage has dropped to about 27 or 28 mpg. Nothing in her driving habits has changed. We still fill up at the same place. Still use 87 Octane and the car seems to run and idle the same. Just the difference in the mpg. I was told the reason for the winter fuel additives is to prevent fuel line freeze up. The gas itself wont freeze but the condensation in the lines could freeze and cause the car to stop running. I believe they remove the additives around the end of March or early April

#13 of 17 drinks faster than I do water by gman1957

Mar 25, 2007 (5:17 pm)

This vehicle is like having gas station near by all times.You never know hom much more you need to go before filling up again.It burns so much gas. I cried everytime I have to goto fillit up,cause I know in a few days I'll be back the station.I wish the car will just burn up and collect on the insurance and get a new vehicle.

#14 of 17 Buick Rendezvous - 27.3 MPG !!! by motobaz

Jul 06, 2008 (4:46 pm)

2003 CX V6, 72K on the clock. We were averaging 27.3 mpg on Interstate 5 from Sacramento heading south, full load, kids dogs and luggage, AC on all the time. I set the cruise at 65. Got home to San Luis Obispo and did some town driving and still averaged out at 25 mpg for the tank. We have the Driver Info Feature which tells you your average mpg on the dash display, a nice feature. That's pretty decent for an SUV. Makes me wonder when I see some of these ads for some of the latest cars and they're bragging about getting 28 mpg.

#15 of 17 Re: 2006 Buick Rendezvous mileage [dill] by Code

Feb 08, 2009 (3:00 pm)

Replying to: dill (Oct 25, 2006 6:31 am)
What is meant by FWD w/traction control?

#16 of 17 sudden drop off on gas mileage by nukem40

Dec 21, 2009 (1:11 pm)

about this time last year ..took rend. into service for battery lite came on ...dealer downloaded patch for computer to fix....then the poor mileage started...from 25-30 hwy to 19 to 21 hwy and 18 to 21 city to 14 to 17 city. dealer replaced fuel pump ....injec cleaned and replaced....drove car with chip to record mil. and agreed .....only thing they can say is is with in paramiters.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!...changed filter...plugs...please someone help....???? 2006 fwd 3.5 lit..basic
Rendu.

#17 of 17 Re: 2006 Buick Rendezvous mileage [Code] by spike99

Dec 22, 2009 (7:42 pm)

Replying to: Code (Feb 08, 2009 3:00 pm)
If wondering...
 
FWD = Front Wheel Drive (only its front wheels can spin)
AWD = All Wheel Drive (all 4 wheels can spin).
 
TCS (sometimes called TC) = Traction Control or Traction Control System means that if its special "wheel sensors" computer senses 1 wheel is spinning `too much`, it automatically applies brakes to that specific "spinning" wheel. Thus, forcing its opposite drive wheel to spin - instead of allowing its single spinning wheel to continue to spin. TCS exists on either FWD (Front Wheel Drive) or RWD (Rear Wheel Drive) vehicles. When TCS exists on all 4 wheels, its called Stability Track system. And yes, TCS on the front wheels and Stability Track across entire vehicle exists on the newer technology vehicles - like my wife's new 2009 mini-van.
 
If wondering, my wife has an older technology 2003 FWD RDV (her "in town" run-about vehicle) that only has TSC on its Front Wheels. When one front wheel spins too much, that single wheel speed is forced to slowed down, thus forcing the other wheel to take more traction. From a white board perspective, vision TCS as Traction Balance System - because it balances 'drive power' delivery to the other wheel(s) - that have better traction then its single spinning wheel.
 
Being a lighter weight 2003 FWD RDV (compared to more steel parts in its heavier weight AWD version), my wife's vehicle also gets good MPGs. Not as good as some better wind dynamic 3.4L vehicles (like a mini-van with 3.4L engine) but it gets much better MPGs then an AWD RDV (with 3.4L engine).
 
For good understanding of TCS, surf: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZzdyH8ethY
 
Hope this helps...
 
.

Messages Page 3 of 3

To POST a message, please Sign In.

Advertisement

Browse by Category

Browse by Vehicle
   View All Vehicles

Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
View All Topics

Edmunds Community

Advertisement