- #81 of 3122
-
Re: Yukon [1487]
by caddys4life
-
Oct 09, 2005 (7:49 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: 1487 (Oct 08, 2005 11:58 am)
Like you said they dont have the fold flat seats in the 3rd row, but they did put a button in the 2nd row to fold those seats so it's easier to get in the back.
|
- #82 of 3122
-
2 door tahoes
by cubs25
-
Oct 10, 2005 (8:41 am)
-
|
|
Ya why dont they come out with a two door tahoe? its better on gas and in my oppion looks better than a 4 door. are they not making them because noone wants them or is it in the future plans? Thanks
|
- #83 of 3122
-
Re: 2 door tahoes [cubs25]
by 307web
-
Oct 10, 2005 (11:19 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: cubs25 (Oct 10, 2005 8:41 am)
If the old 2 door Tahoes were selling well, they would have kept them. They are proven poor-sellers.
|
- #84 of 3122
-
Re: 2 door tahoes [307web]
by cubs25
-
Oct 10, 2005 (1:26 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: 307web (Oct 10, 2005 11:19 am)
ya thats wat i thought but i think eventually they will come out with one.
|
- #85 of 3122
-
Dig the new interiors
by callmedrfill
-
Oct 10, 2005 (10:24 pm)
-
|
OBVIOUSLY saved a penny or two on the exterior. It's exactly the same, except the rear-end is more minivan!
The new Tahoe is not as cheesy as the current one, but it's too little, too late. This is a dying breed, save the Suburban.
In 5 years, none of these beasts will sell 100k, unless Employee Pricing become the next 0%.
Watch out for Hybrid minivans from Honda and 'Yota! They will chew at the class as well as bigger crew-cab pick-ups.
Why does GM have to be dragged kicking-and-screaming into building something DECENT (Tahoe), much less superior? Is this what we've been waiting over 15 years for (some wait longer than I do)? The same truck with a contemporary interior? 
Good luck, GM. Looks like you will need it.
DrFill
|
- #86 of 3122
-
Re: Dig the new interiors [callmedrfill]
by cubs25
-
Oct 11, 2005 (1:40 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: callmedrfill (Oct 10, 2005 10:24 pm)
good point
|
- #87 of 3122
-
Re: Dig the new interiors [callmedrfill]
by blckislandguy
-
Oct 11, 2005 (7:12 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: callmedrfill (Oct 10, 2005 10:24 pm)
Amen. The only thing I can add to this excellent post is that supposedly bringing big Bob Lutz , the car guy extradinaire, in was going to revitalize the product line. Bob has had more jobs with more manufacturers in the industry than anyone. The ex-Marine who commutes to work in his helicopter was going to infuse GM with his product knowledge. Haven't seen it yet and the jury is still very much out on the new Yukon. The specs are not much different from a 1965 Ford Country Squire, except the Country Squire had a two way tail gate (as I recall, it could swing open to one side or be opened and pulled down) which GM hasn't matched.
|
- #88 of 3122
-
Re: The Devil is in the Details: Lets Wait to See What GM Does [mbrochujr]
by tdoh
-
Oct 12, 2005 (8:31 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: mbrochujr (Oct 05, 2005 4:25 pm)
Re: your Armada vs. Denali comparo--Denali offers 2nd-row captains chairs, so I dunno how the fact that the Armada offers them too makes it a "better" feature on the Armada. Yes, I'm nitpicking--if not quibbling--a bit here but at the same time, I could also add that I can't see how a 7" non-touchscreen nav available on the Armada could be considered "better" than the 6.5" touchscreen one available on the Denali--I dunno about you but I'm willing to bet that most people would take a 6.5" touchscreen over a 7" non-touchscreen any day of the week. And although the Armada may indeed have "better" features than the Denali at "much less" (I assume you were referring to price), the Armada does not come w/ a 6-liter engine like that found in the Denali, so your power comment regarding the 5.3L GM engine is a little out of place--IOW, it would be a bit unfair to favorably compare the Armada to two different trim lines of Yukons (different in that Denalis only come with the 6-liter engine). At the same time, one could have argued that--until recently--an Armada could not be had for "much less" than a Denali, given the just-expired GM Employee Discount promotion.
|
- #89 of 3122
-
Re: Yukon [1487]
by tdoh
-
Oct 12, 2005 (8:37 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: 1487 (Oct 08, 2005 11:58 am)
I think the front end could have been styled a bit more differently; I mean, it sure looks a lot like an Envoy front end...just bigger.
|
- #90 of 3122
-
Re: Yukon [tdoh]
by cubs25
-
Oct 12, 2005 (6:08 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: tdoh (Oct 12, 2005 8:37 am)
ya it does damn and i think the tahoes went down hill after the year 2000 and on becasue of how they make things so damn cheap now and everything
|
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
SUVs 
