Sign In Join 



2007 and newer Chevrolet Tahoe and GMC Yukon

3125 messages,  Last post on Nov 27, 2009 at 6:32 PM

You are in the Chevrolet Suburban & Tahoe Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Chevrolet Tahoe, GMC Yukon, SUV


Messages Page 47 of 314
1
...
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
...
314
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#456 of 3125
chill out by ahightower
Feb 17, 2006 (10:34 am)
Reply
Dudes, keep it cool. There is a whole forum dedicated to domestic versus import and American loyalty. Try to keep this one on point and civil. You've all made your points, now let's just discuss the vehicle in question on its own merits.
#457 of 3125
Re: chill out [ahightower] by tyresmoker
Feb 17, 2006 (11:42 am)
Reply

Replying to: ahightower (Feb 17, 2006 10:34 am)

Yeah, good point.
#458 of 3125
Why is Tahoe out front of Yukon by sdron
Feb 17, 2006 (2:41 pm)
Reply
I have been wondering lately especially with GMs problems, why is there a Chevy and a GMC brand? Wouldn't GM be better off and save money on everything, if they only had Chevy Tahoes or Chevy Silverados and not Yukons and Sierras too? I have never understood this logic. Can someone please explain?
 
But....since they do have both why is the Tahoe the front runner on all promotion and advertising? I have seen 2 commercials to date for the Yukon. One was on ESPN football and the other on Survivor last night, but have seen many Tahoe commercials.
#459 of 3125
Re: Why is Tahoe out front of Yukon [sdron] by rcf8000
Feb 17, 2006 (5:10 pm)
Reply

Replying to: sdron (Feb 17, 2006 2:41 pm)

I suppose the main reason for the Yukon is that it gives GM more stores selling the trucks. One disadvantage of having the two brands is that it lets Ford crow year after year that the F150 is the country's biggest selling truck. If you add Chevrolet and GMC sales together, they outsell Ford.
#460 of 3125
Re: Why is Tahoe out front of Yukon [sdron] by nedzel
Feb 17, 2006 (6:19 pm)
Reply

Replying to: sdron (Feb 17, 2006 2:41 pm)

Too many brands is one of GMs big problems. Toyota has one minivan. They only have to engineer and market that one minivan. GM has how many minivans? 4? 5? And not one of them is any good.
 
Instead of engineering and marketing 4 or 5 different variations on that theme, GM should put that extra money into making that one single minivan and making it the best darn minivan there is.
 
I agree, that GMC should go away. Chevy trucks covers that market just fine. Instead of spending the money to design, build and market two different front-end clips for the Tahoe/Tahoe XL, they should have taken that same money and engineered a better-riding, better-handling independent rear suspension.
 
Buick may be salvageable with a much reduced product line. Pontiac should be killed -- move the Solstice to Chevy and shoot the rest. Saturn can (and apparently will be) moved upmarket to try to compete against Acura. That may actually work if they stop building dreck. Cadillac seems to be turning the corner.
#463 of 3125
Independent Rear Suspension by smittywall
Feb 17, 2006 (8:24 pm)
Reply

Replying to: nedzel (Feb 17, 2006 6:19 pm)

Independent rear suspensions (IRS) combined with fold flat seats (to please those who really want a minivan) hurt a trucks ride by reducing the available wheel travel. The '06 Tahoe already had the best ride of the 4 full size SUVs and the '07 Yukon I test drove last weekend was even better. The Expedition and Armada both with IRS, ride like bricks.

Messages Page 47 of 314
1
...
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
...
314
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement