Sign In Join 



2007 and newer Chevrolet Tahoe and GMC Yukon

3125 messages,  Last post on Nov 27, 2009 at 6:32 PM

You are in the Chevrolet Suburban & Tahoe Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Chevrolet Tahoe, GMC Yukon, SUV


Messages Page 234 of 313
1
...
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
...
313
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#2326 of 3125
Re: 07 2wd FlexFuel [csprick] by 4speed1
Feb 19, 2007 (7:38 pm)
Reply

Replying to: csprick (Feb 19, 2007 3:31 pm)

My secret is
 
--CRUISE CONTROL
 
--Not racing up to red lights like 99.9% of drivers do. Always amazes me how many people are in a hurry to get to a red light.
 
--And drive quite softly overall.
 
I also go the speed limit--rarely go over 70--usually do 60-65 mph. My hot-rodding day are past me. I already set plenty of land speed records and have the tickets to prove it.
 
But I have had it up to 90 -100 mph a fews times
 
Most people do not use cruise control, but it makes a hell of a difference. I know this because I see people varying their speed all the time while mine is constant.
 
I used to have a 99 Tahoe 2 door, and the most I ever got out of it was about 17mpg with the same driving style I have now. This 07 tahoe is a much better motor with more power too.
 
The Tahoe will run in 4 cyl mode as long as your going under 70 (level road).
 
At 55-60/mph it will run in 4 cyl mode even on slight hills. This definatly helps the MPG.
 
But I see people passing me in their 07 Tahoes all the time doing 80mph-----so I guess that's why you got people on here complaining about mpg's.
 
Now I wish the Tahoe had a 5 speed manual transmission---That would be cool. Why doesn't Chevy do that?
#2327 of 3125
Re: 07 2wd FlexFuel [rockin_ltz] by tidester HOST
Feb 19, 2007 (9:28 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rockin_ltz (Feb 19, 2007 5:48 pm)

see some serious and heated discussions on the mileage that these beasts are getting!!
 
For even more fun, visit Chevrolet Suburban and GMC Tahoe MPG - Real World Numbers.
 
tidester, host
SUVs and Smart Shopper
#2328 of 3125
Re: 07 2wd FlexFuel [4speed1] by csprick
Feb 19, 2007 (9:39 pm)
Reply

Replying to: 4speed1 (Feb 19, 2007 7:38 pm)

Thanks for the info, 4speed1. That's good advice you shared with us. I'm curious as to where you live, or more specifically, the type of roads you travel. I have to admit that I do not use my cruise control very much, except on long trips on Interstates.
 
I live north of Houston about 6 miles from the nearest highway - lots of stoplights between me and a 60 mph road. A lot of my travel is local streets, i.e., non-highway, with max SL of 40-45mph. Once I do hit a highway (and a lot of them here in TX are two lane or four lane undivided), the traffic is usually heavy and traffic speeds vary so much that using the cruise control seems pointless. Like you, my speeding days are mostly past and I also try to drive "soft". The old recommendation about pretending there is an egg between one's foot and the pedal does help improve the mileage. I'm hoping the mileage will improve as I get more miles on my Tahoe.
 
My observations regarding the 4 cyl mode is pretty much like yours; however, I wore out my left leg shifting a manual transmission in a Nissan 4X4 while commuting 50 miles a day on Hwy 101 through Silicon Valley a few years ago. I got my fill of "freeways" in the San Francisco Bay area and for the past five years commuting to downtown LA.
 
God Bless Texas!
#2329 of 3125
Re: 07 2wd FlexFuel [4speed1] by jerrywimer
Feb 20, 2007 (4:36 am)
Reply

Replying to: 4speed1 (Feb 19, 2007 7:38 pm)

Pretty much identical results and methodology to what gets me similar results with my Avalanche (actually, you're currently just a tiny bit higher on your results than I'm seeing). Glad to see someone that "actually owns a Tahoe" posting this experience.
#2330 of 3125
Re: 07 2wd FlexFuel [tidester] by jerrywimer
Feb 20, 2007 (4:38 am)
Reply

Replying to: tidester (Feb 19, 2007 9:28 pm)

Been there, done that (seriously!). Hence the dig about "actually owns a Tahoe" above.
 
On the other hand, I've been pretty consistently upper 17's to mid-18's for the past couple months. I'm hoping it's mostly to do with the colder weather and possibly fuel mix in this area. That is 90%+ highway for anyone wondering. Not sure what I'd get in some of the kinds of "in town" driving some here have to do (my own version of in-town hasn't put me below 17 yet though, but maybe it's a bit less stop'n'go and low speed than others).
#2331 of 3125
Re: 07 2wd FlexFuel [4speed1] by junglegeorge
Feb 20, 2007 (4:41 am)
Reply

Replying to: 4speed1 (Feb 19, 2007 7:38 pm)

Your numbers are much better than mine, and we share the same driving style. Here in upstate NY we have 10% ethanol in our fuel, and that does have a negative effect on MPG. I have a 07-LTZ with 3:73 gears and about 14k on the clock, I have made several trips from upstate NY to NC, 700 miles each way, with a light load, best I can achieve on a trip is 17.5 and city is about 14.5. The truck will not stay in V4 unless I am costing. I have had numerous electrical issues that may be contributing to this issue, but love the truck. What gears are you running? George
#2332 of 3125
windshield wiper availability and performance issue [junglegeorge] by junglegeorge
Feb 20, 2007 (6:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: junglegeorge (Feb 20, 2007 4:41 am)

Wiper blade issue
 
I am looking to see how wide spread this issue is, and make you aware of a potential windshield wiper availability and performance issue. I have seen several previous posts on this site and others. If we get enough responses, I am confident the host will move us to a separate discussion topic. I live in up-state NY and we have just had our first true winter weather this year with 2+ feet of snow. Unfortunately, the wiper blades supplied on my 2007 LTZ Tahoe did not perform as expected. They iced up very quickly, and this prevented them from contacting the windshield properly. Additionally the passenger side has fallen off twice to date, (I found it the first time, was not so lucky the second time) I contributed this to the excess weight if the ice buildup, and the momentum of the swing blade. GM is using this newly designed 1 piece blade, with a new mounting mechanism, which is manufactured solely by Valeo, on all of the GMT-900 trucks. This new design utilizes a completely different mounting system that is not compatible with any other system. Neither aftermarket blades nor refills are compatible with this new design. When I went looking for a replacement blade, I found them to be non-existent. I checked the parts department at four separate Chevy dealers, none had these blades in stock, and all were surprised to find a redesigned mount. An extensive internet search reviled that “TIRE RACK” carries the Valeo on-line blade for $29.99 each; this is the same price that all four dealers quoted. I found this to be much more expensive than a premium aftermarket winter blade that cost $5.99 for my 04 Tahoe. I called the Valeo R&D center in Auburn Hills MI and discussed the issue with a Valeo representative who was very interested in my feedback. He stated that these blades are tested to perform in winter conditions, and was surprise to here that I had lost a blade twice. He confirmed that No winter blades are available, and that there are no plans to design any. He stated that my call was the only comment he has received regarding the new design, therefore I would encourage you to speak up on this issue if appropriate. Calls to several aftermarket manufactures confirmed this and also revealed a patent issue that currently prevents after marketers them from manufacturing a replacement. I strongly suggest that for the time being, that you face the situation, and purchase a spare blade set to keep them in the vehicle, as they are not yet readily available. I found my self-driving in the worst conditions with only one blade.
 
Contact info for Valeo:
 
VALEO Electrical Systems, Inc.
Wiper Systems Division
3000 University Drive
MI 48326-2356 Auburn Hills (United States)
tel: (1) 2483403000
fax: (1) 2483403106
 
Thanks, George
#2333 of 3125
Re: windshield wiper availability and performance issue [junglegeorge] by saratogalake
Feb 20, 2007 (8:58 am)
Reply

Replying to: junglegeorge (Feb 20, 2007 6:32 am)

Hi George, Thanks for all the info. I just called Valeo and spoke to a darell whitney in sales. He was unaware of any other calls and the problem with the 2007 wiper blades. I explained the problem and he listened with great interest. He said the dealerships should have been aware of the change and should carry spares. I begged him to consider making a rubber covered winter blade as these blades are totally worthless in snow & ice. I made him aware that his company may be liable in the event of an accident due to the poor quality of the design of the blades and the lack of a winter option. I think more people should make the call and let them know the story. Maybe this will wake them up. Steve
#2334 of 3125
Re: windshield wiper availability and performance issue [junglegeorge] by rockman59
Feb 20, 2007 (7:54 pm)
Reply

Replying to: junglegeorge (Feb 20, 2007 6:32 am)

JungleGeorge said: Calls to several aftermarket manufacturers confirmed this and also revealed a patent issue that currently prevents after marketers from manufacturing a replacement blade.
____________________________________________________________
It is getting pretty bad when GM goes to outside vendors to get wiper blades that are patented and cannot be made by anyone else without paying a royalty. And you can bet GM is/will be getting a piece of this aftermarket pie too. Pardon my French, but this is really Chicken ..it. I have always been a GM fan but some of their latest tactics have completely turned me off, particularly the fact that you have to replace the entire fuel pump in order to change the fuel filter in my '06 Suburban. It is just another back door way to bleed the consumer.
#2335 of 3125
Re: windshield wiper availability and performance issue [rockman59] by junglegeorge
Feb 21, 2007 (2:20 am)
Reply

Replying to: rockman59 (Feb 20, 2007 7:54 pm)

Take a good look at your ball joints, they are non-serviceable, one peice, with no grease fittings. When they fail, you will be forced to replace the entire control arm. As a matter of fact, I can only find 2 grease fittings on the entire truck. Maybe I am old-school, but I am very disappointed in some of the engineering, but over all I am still happy with the truck. I will only keep it 2-3 years, 40K - 60K miles and hopefully trade it prior to any major repairs. George

Messages Page 234 of 313
1
...
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
...
313
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement