Sign In Join 



2007 and newer Chevrolet Tahoe and GMC Yukon

3125 messages,  Last post on Nov 27, 2009 at 6:32 PM

You are in the Chevrolet Suburban & Tahoe Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Chevrolet Tahoe, GMC Yukon, SUV


Messages Page 207 of 313
1
...
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
...
313
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#2060 of 3125
Re: 1 Week in Heaven [phustead] by rhame13
Oct 20, 2006 (8:29 pm)
Reply

Replying to: phustead (Oct 18, 2006 8:30 pm)

Phustead
 
Have not heard anything back on mud flaps as well....apparently someone didn't think that far enough ahead to consider that we might want to keep the debris off of our new ride.
 
On the IPOD interface.....PAC Audio makes IPOD interface cables for almost every car out there so that you can use the the stereo controls and it charges the IPOD while it is plugged in. From what I understand the cable for the 2007 Tahoe/Yukon is not available yet. If any of you hear that it is shipping or available, please pass it on. My plan is to ultimately mount it in the center console and just leave it in my car (hidden) without the fear of some moron breaking my window to steal it. Currently I have a Bracketron mount up in that area where I keep my Palm Treo mounted while I am in the car. There is an extension unit that I could add so that I can mount an IPOD next to it, but once again, I would leave it in the car and don't want it to walk off.
 
Don't you just love those running boards.........sweet....I am glad I waited for them.
#2061 of 3125
Re: Why are we not surprised? [rspencer] by rhame13
Oct 20, 2006 (9:05 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rspencer (Oct 20, 2006 7:25 pm)

jerrywimer & rspencer
 
I want to start by saying that I don't think there are any two people that have contributed as much to my education on the new Yukon and this forum as you two.
 
It's obvious you both are passionate about your position concerning the MPG in these new models.
 
It's also fairly obvious that all of the postings in the world will not change either of your opinions.
 
I see both of your points: I am not getting the MPG that was advertised. (Won't be the first time I was dissapointed with a manufacturers claim.....ie Hair Club for Men) and due to the fact that I love hearing that V8 exhaust note in the new model, I tend to drop the gas pedal a little harder than in my 2002 Yukon. Is this contributing to my decreased MPG? I would say DUH.....
 
I started reading this forum several months ago while I was waiting on my beauty to get here. I would check it before I went to work, at work and then at night just to see if there was a new post or pic available from users like you two. I would get really pumped reading about the positive experiences and problems that different people had encountered. These postings helped me go back and reaffirm my decision of ordering my new Yukon, it also gave me a laundry list to go and ask the dealer on some of the different issues relating to the new model.
 
I would hate for a new reader in this forum to come around and have to sift through several pages of you guys going at it to prove your point on the MPG. I want them to have the same positive experience here that I did.
 
At the end of the day, we all have GM's newest and finest...are there room for improvements...YES....But it's still better than a FORD. (did I just start something with that comment?)
#2062 of 3125
Re: Why are we not surprised? [rhame13] by rspencer
Oct 21, 2006 (5:55 am)
Reply

Replying to: rhame13 (Oct 20, 2006 9:05 pm)

I love my Tahoe too...even with the dissappointing MPG's. It's pretty easy to remember back in time to model years that had all kinds of shortcomings and problems that are thankfully long gone. GM has done a great job of picking up on consumer complaints and consumer preferences - not always as fast as some would like...but they're getting after it.
 
Outside of their own long term survival...Mileage(fuel efficiency/cost)is probably thetoughest problem GM has ever faced. It's a tough nut to crack - but it can be done.
 
Having been in several GM plants and support facilities(engineering, assembly, manufacturing, management...) my expectations are high. It's a big org., it moves SLOW...but it can accomplish good things. The resources are there...$6.5 R&D budget last statement I saw. No reason why they can't git' er' done.
#2063 of 3125
Re: Why are we not surprised? [rspencer] by jerrywimer
Oct 21, 2006 (1:58 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rspencer (Oct 20, 2006 7:25 pm)

rspencer: Keep digging and trying to prove me wrong. If you'd ever like to come over just send me a PM. I still have the records of all my fillups for both the vehicles you're questioning results for. Otherwise- hey, What can I say? Firstly any time I've reported "routine" numbers they've been within the bounds of the EPA tests on the window stickers (or at best maybe 1 to 2 over). Secondly I told you I tend to be above average. And those numbers you posted for the 3.5L / 4 speed auto Malibu are not only far below what I ever saw from our car, they're far below what I've ever seen posted anywhere else. I believe the worst I've ever seen listed was high teens for city driving (don't recall where at the moment though).
 
bk777: Huh? You make (absolutely no) sense.
 
rhame13: I agree. Sorry for cluttering up the topic. If I didn't feel that rspencer is trying to cast my posts as false I'd have stopped awhile ago (back when I said I was done with this). Hopefully he gives it up for now, as I haven't posted one thing anywhere that's untrue or even unbelievable regardless of the results anyone else are seeing.
 
If anyone is seriously interested in seeing numbers from my logs, including you rspencer, just PM me. Otherwise I'm done with this discussion in this topic. We can (as suggested by others) take it to more appropriate topics if you'd like to continue the public discussion.
 
Back mudflaps aren't available for the Tahoe yet? I've just finally given up and ordered both front and rear contoured sets from GM for the Avalanche. Even these 20" wheels and tires are grabbing gravels from our driveway. The result is that I've got tons of tiny chips immediately behind every tire at the very bottom edge of the fenders. Coincidentally, that's exactly the spots the contoured mudflaps would've (will) cover. I've also got some touchup paint on order so I can fix the chips before I put the mudflaps on. Don't need rust problems down the road!
#2064 of 3125
Re: Why are we not surprised? [jerrywimer] by tidester HOST
Oct 21, 2006 (3:02 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jerrywimer (Oct 21, 2006 1:58 pm)

Let's give it a rest. We all know you guys disagree and we also know you're not going to resolve the matter. It's time to move on.
 
tidester, host
#2065 of 3125
20" Tires by pdsniper
Oct 21, 2006 (3:42 pm)
Reply
I agree with you jerrywimer. The 20" tires on the LT & LTZ suck as far as picking up gravel. I have the Bridgestone Dueler H/L, are these the same tires that you are having problems with? I'm always picking gravel out of the tires to keep them from flying off onto the vehicle. I have a set of Bridgestone Dueler Revos on my Ford Super Duty and I love them. They work great in snow and mud and they don’t hold onto gravel as much. I hope they come out with the Revos in a 20".
#2066 of 3125
Re: Why are we not surprised? [jerrywimer] by rspencer
Oct 22, 2006 (9:44 am)
Reply

Replying to: jerrywimer (Oct 21, 2006 1:58 pm)

Sure...we believe all those outrageous mileage claims.
------------------------------------------------------------
 
#3188 of 4662 Re: Gas Mileage [jerrywimer] by bhw77 Apr 01, 2005 (6:37 am)
| E-mail Msg
Replying to: jerrywimer (Apr 01, 2005 4:37 am)
 
I barely make 16.5 mpg with my 04'Maxx in moderate city traffic.
DIC indicates 18.8 mpg and 19 mh average speed .
No heavy take offs and I am not an aggressive driver.
I am not that impressed...
#2068 of 3125
Restructuring by tidester HOST
Oct 22, 2006 (11:36 am)
Reply
You've probably noticed new discussions appearing all over the forums. What's happening is that we are closing generic, everything-in-one pile discussions like this and creating smaller discussions that deal with specific areas of interest.
 
You'll find a number of discussions listed at the top level of this group: Chevrolet Suburban & Tahoe. When you are ready to post, please check the discussion list there for the appropriate discussion to post in. If there doesn't appear to be a discussion for the issue or problem you have, feel free to create one. We can deal with accidental duplication of topics as things progress.
 
While you are at the top-level, don't forget to click on Track This Group. You will then be tracking all of the Chevrolet Suburban & Tahoe discussions that are here, as well as any new ones as they are created.
 
Using Read New Posts will mean you won't miss anything on the Chevrolet Suburban & Tahoe board. If a discussion pops up which doesn't interest you (or is closed), all you have to do is click on Remove Track within the discussion.
 
Thanks for your understanding and help in making this group a great resource of information for Chevrolet Suburban & Tahoe owners!
 
tidester, host
#2069 of 3125
P.S. by tidester HOST
Oct 23, 2006 (8:21 am)
Reply
Be sure to visit Suburban/Tahoe Owners: Meet the Members to stay in touch!
 
tidester, host

Messages Page 207 of 313
1
...
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
...
313
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement