Sign In Join 



2007 and newer Chevrolet Tahoe and GMC Yukon

3125 messages,  Last post on Nov 27, 2009 at 6:32 PM

You are in the Chevrolet Suburban & Tahoe Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Chevrolet Tahoe, GMC Yukon, SUV


Messages Page 14 of 313
1
...
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
...
313
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#130 of 3125
Re: flat-fold third seat [dardson1] by jay_24
Nov 03, 2005 (6:19 am)
Reply

Replying to: dardson1 (Nov 02, 2005 7:46 pm)

The third row is useful. We use it daily for taking kids to school. On trips its ussually folded or out. For our family of 5 it works great. For short trips across town and what not, grandma and grandpa can come along (throw the kids in 3rd row). There is about the same amount of room behind the third row in the Tahoe as a mini-van. I'll agree it ain't much.
 
Does it need to be a fold flat? nope.
 
Is a suburban better? Possibly, but its also more $$ and too long for my garage.
 
Best part is if you don't want the third row, just remove it.
#131 of 3125
Re: flat-fold third seat [dardson1] by alston28
Nov 03, 2005 (8:20 am)
Reply

Replying to: dardson1 (Nov 02, 2005 7:46 pm)

I had the same dilemma. An earlier post said that, with the 3rd row seat, you get heavier rear springs. Even if my wife hadn't insisted that I get the 3rd row seat, the report of heavier springs alone would have convinced me. I agree that, with the 3rd row seat "up" (so people can sit in it), there's little room behind it for storage space.
#132 of 3125
Re: flat-fold third seat [dardson1] - gas mileage by alston28
Nov 03, 2005 (8:22 am)
Reply

Replying to: dardson1 (Nov 02, 2005 7:46 pm)

35 years ago, I remember buying gas at 24.9. Back then, I drove a small French import that got about 35 mpg. Now, I have a 2005 Tahoe. Man, have things ever changed.
#133 of 3125
Re: flat-fold third seat [alston28] by ahightower
Nov 03, 2005 (11:13 am)
Reply

Replying to: alston28 (Nov 03, 2005 8:20 am)

One thing that's nice about the Tahoe/Yukon third row is that it is actually two pieces, so you could fold or remove one half if there's only one passenger back there. That frees up some of the cargo space. Whereas the Suburban/YXL have a one-piece unit. I've never lacked cargo space behind the third row of my YXL, but it would still be nice to have the two-pice unit, both for a little extra space occasionally, and it would be lighter and easier to remove in two pieces.
 
On the other hand, having a one piece bench might make it more comfortable for a person to sit in the middle of that third row, instead of riding the split. In fact, can you actually seat three across the Tahoe third row? Is there a middle seat belt? I wonder if the 2007 Suburban/YXL will have the split seat, or stay with the one piece.
#134 of 3125
Re: flat-fold third seat by 4rider
Nov 03, 2005 (11:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: jay_24 (Nov 03, 2005 6:19 am)

People seem to forget that the passengers on the 3rd seat on Tahoes or the similar are literally inches away from the back window. This simply mean there are virtually no buffer between the passengers and the SUV behind them in case of a serious rear end collision. Of course, no manufacture will ever tell you that.
#135 of 3125
Re: Great Info on 2007's!!! [suv_jerry] by brozowski
Nov 03, 2005 (1:33 pm)
Reply

Replying to: suv_jerry (Oct 30, 2005 9:48 pm)

Thanks for the reference to the Edmunds web site.
 
First of all, to those of you who want a folding 3rd seat - get a minivan. Amen.
 
Regarding quality, some of the postings indicated the new extended models would be out in June, 2006. I recommend you wait for late 2007 models or the 2008 models. They will have the bugs worked out by then If you don't mind a few extra days in the shop, then go ahead with an early 2007 model.
 
I have purchased two models with signficant improvements over the prior year but not complete redesigns - 1996 and 2003. Both had problems with the radios. Both got two replacements. If you need a new, extended model (Suburban or Yukon XL) right away, buy a 2006. By the time the late 2007's come out or the 2008's, you will have a good trade in, and you can enjoy the new model.
 
I just picked up a 2005 2500 model with everything - including DVD player. Everything is working great after 10,000 miles.
 
I have to agree with the people who say the 5.3 is too small. It is. I have a 6.0 liter and I think it is just barely powerful enough.
 
Does anyone have any ideas on the new 2500 models? Will they be equipped for towing? Will they offer the big block option? The lack of a big block enging and/or substantial rear bumper could squash the large towing capacity currrently available.
 
By the way, the 8.1 liter, while a gas hog, was a blast to drive.
#136 of 3125
Re: flat-fold third seat [4rider] by jay_24
Nov 03, 2005 (1:41 pm)
Reply

Replying to: 4rider (Nov 03, 2005 11:39 am)

Agree. Keep in mind this goes for all minivans too.
About a month ago I saw the results of a Honda Accord that rear-ended a Tahoe. The Accord for the most part looked totalled. Airbags deployed, total front end pushed back into the engine. I'm not sure but I think there was a scratch on the Tahoe's bumper. (meaning no visible damage as I passed by.)
#137 of 3125
Re: flat-fold third seat [jay_24] by 4rider
Nov 03, 2005 (5:19 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jay_24 (Nov 03, 2005 1:41 pm)

"About a month ago I saw the results of a Honda Accord that rear-ended a Tahoe. The Accord for the most part looked totalled. Airbags deployed, total front end pushed back into the engine. I'm not sure but I think there was a scratch on the Tahoe's bumper. (meaning no visible damage as I passed by"
 
True. It is no sweat if hit by a Accord or most passenger cars in non high speed situations. I guess this is one of the resons we drive giant SUVs.
#138 of 3125
Re: Great Info on 2007's!!! [brozowski] by dieselone
Nov 03, 2005 (5:34 pm)
Reply

Replying to: brozowski (Nov 03, 2005 1:33 pm)

I agree on the 5.3, unless GM has found a way to get more low rpm torque, the 5.3 just isn't strong enough for a Suburban. A 6 speed trans could possibly help by offering more gear ratios. It's adequate for hauling people, but once I put my 5000lb boat on back and start hitting the hills, it gets weak fast.
 
The main reason I went with a Suburban over the Tahoe was the extra wheel base for towing stability and the extra room behind the 3rd row which comes in handy when someone needs to sit back there and I need cargo space as well.
#139 of 3125
Re: flat-fold third seat [jay_24] by nedzel
Nov 04, 2005 (7:13 am)
Reply

Replying to: jay_24 (Nov 03, 2005 1:41 pm)

I suspect that part of the reason for that was because the Accord was braking, thus causing its front end to dive. The Accord already has a relatively low front end. Combine that with some dive and the hood of the Accord hit the undercarriage of Tahoe...

Messages Page 14 of 313
1
...
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
...
313
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement