Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
SUVs Chevrolet Suburban & Tahoe 2007 and newer Chevrolet Tahoe and GMC Yukon
3125 messages, Last post on Nov 27, 2009 at 6:32 PM
You are in the Chevrolet Suburban & Tahoe Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
|
Replying to: jay_24 (Oct 27, 2005 5:01 am) The people on here calling this a "catch up" vehicle are delusional. Catching up to what? The interiors are far better than anything short of the Navigator or Lexus GX. The powertrains are potent and have class leading technology. The overall feature count is impressive. I dont know what vehicles in this price range are on par with the new Yukon and Tahoe. The Armada would be the closest thind, but one look at its plasticky interior tells you Nissan cut some corners to save money. An IRS is the only thing that could've made these trucks better than they are already. For the record I like the Denali's front end. I saw the trucks in motion on Autoline Detroit on Speedchannel and they looked good. |
|
|
Replying to: suv_jerry (Oct 30, 2005 9:48 pm) Well, being a first year model, there will likely be some quality issues. However, my experience with a 2003 Z71 Tahoe (which I bought new and ran up 65k on the clock in two and a half years) was, overall, very good. I had fewer problems with it than the GS400 it replaced. I had about the same number of problems as a RX300 my wife currently drives. I had MUCH FEWER problems with the Tahoe than I had with an Audi A6. The truck was the most comfortable vehicle I've ever driven. Was it mechanically perfect during those 65k? Nope. Was it dependable? Absolutely. In my case, it was a great truck! |
|
|
What's funny to me. . . everyone's upgrading to the second row buckets as it makes the third row more easily available. Pretty simple math. . . in an upscale Tahoe (front buckets) and optional second row buckets . . . you can get 2 up front, 2 in the second row, and 2 in back . . . that = 6. The lowly bench and second row standard seat available in a base LS delivers exactly the same passenger capacity and you still have room in back for luggage. I agree with a previous poster. . . .the architecture of a minivan (huge doors and low step-in) make them superior people movers. Who cares if a Tahoe has a flat-fold third seat. They don't work well in these trucks. I wish GM would make an upscale Tahoe with a bench option. BTW. . . I recently bought an '06 2wd Z71. I discovered I could get something dressed up like an LT (in the Z71) without the manditory 3rd seat. love my Tahoe
|
|
|
Replying to: suv_jerry (Oct 30, 2005 9:48 pm) My son drove his 4WD 2002 Tahoe for 265,000 miles with only replacing tires and brakes. It had the "ticking" engine but it only got so bad and then never got any worse. The engine was quiet when it was warm, even with 265,000 miles. He was religious about oil changes (3000 to 5000 miles). He traded it for an '05 which he likes even better, again no problems. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: dardson1 (Nov 01, 2005 7:45 pm) Technically three in the back, but I would not want to be one of them... Good point though, 3+3 vs. 2+2+2. But if you carry that many people on a regular basis, you don't want to be shoulder to shoulder the whole time. Or within hair-pulling distance. And you don't want a child in the front seat, according to the so-called safety experts. We only have three kids, but all are in toddler car seats. It is pretty difficult to fit three of these modern gigantic cars seats across a single bench. Also more difficult to get the kids loaded into those seats all in a row. Much easier to have a couple walk through the "aisle" to get to the back. We have two in the back, one in the middle, and an extra middle row seat for mom to tend to the young'uns and hand out cheerios on long trips. In my humble opinion, if you have three or four kids, the long wheelbase Suburban or Yukon XL are worth the extra money over the Tahoe/Yukon. It does fit in a (clean and organized) garage, is surprisingly easy to maneuver and park, and you have plenty of cargo space behind that third row. Also, the second row windows roll all the way down, I saw someone complain about that in their Tahoe a while back. Nearly identical fuel economy too, if you are a tree hugger. In a perfect world, I'd have second row buckets and a front row bench. There would be buckets in the middle for every day practicality, the extra front seat for occasional use, and more front knee room without that center console thing, for the long-legged freaks among us. Also, I would like to install a limo-style screen behind the front row so we can close off the noise from the children when they are being particularly rowdy. There's got to be something out there from one of the companies that makes Escalades into limos, right?... |
|
|
Replying to: ahightower (Nov 02, 2005 10:44 am) Me too!  Don't forget it would stop flying projectiles as well. --jay |
|
|
Replying to: ahightower (Nov 02, 2005 10:44 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: dardson1 (Nov 02, 2005 7:46 pm) Does it need to be a fold flat? nope. Is a suburban better? Possibly, but its also more $$ and too long for my garage. Best part is if you don't want the third row, just remove it.
|
|
|
Replying to: dardson1 (Nov 02, 2005 7:46 pm)
|
|
You are here:
Forums
SUVs Chevrolet Suburban & Tahoe 2007 and newer Chevrolet Tahoe and GMC Yukon
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Chevrolet Tahoe
2010 GMC Yukon
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
