Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Prices Paid: Buying & Leasing Experiences Volvo XC90 Lease Questions
1547 messages, Last post on Dec 04, 2009 at 4:23 AM
You are in the Prices Paid: Buying & Leasing Experiences Forum. Your Hosts are car_man & kyfdx
|
Replying to: goucla (Sep 02, 2009 4:00 pm) Volvo Incentives: Volvo Loyalty Cash 1500 (1500) Alt Lease Support 3000 (4000) Marketing Support 1500 (500) TOTAL 6000 (6000) US Bank Lease Terms for 2009 model year: 36 mos/12k mi per year - 41% residual value, .00212 money factor 36 mos/15k mi per year - 39% residual value, .00212 money factor 48 mos/12k mi per year - 32% residual value, .00207 money factor 48 mos/15k mi per year - 30% residual value, .00207 money factor US Bank Lease Terms for 2010 model year: Add 1% to 2009 RVs, same mf's Took me a couple days, hope this saves others some time.
|
|
|
Replying to: goucla (Sep 03, 2009 9:25 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: zamo (Sep 03, 2009 9:35 am) Independent banks don't like to finance leases for cars that would be 5-8 years old when they come off lease, there's too much back-end risk on residual values so they whack em down low in used car leases. Plus, you don't get the 5-year safe+sound maintenance-free coverage from new... All in all, you're way better off leasing new than CPO. And don't let any used car salesman convince you otherwise. If they do, post your deal terms on this board first before pulling the trigger and we'll give you some honest feedback...
|
|
|
Replying to: goucla (Sep 03, 2009 1:27 pm) With those horrible residuals you can hint that used XC90s are going for cheap and with 6 year/100K mile warranty: http://tinyurl.com/n4tfos You get a 4 year loan from chase  5.31%: http://tinyurl.com/oxyumh Your payments are $601.26 with $0 down. It makes more sense to buy a CPO rather than to lease a new one; after 4 years you still got equity with the former. I do the math all the time; just got a new Subaru Legacy 2.5i SE for $244 + tax with $0 due at signing (not even tag or tax). 36 months lease/12K miles a year.
|
|
|
Replying to: zamo (Sep 03, 2009 6:21 pm) First, you'll spend more on maintenance on a CPO (assume $500-$1000/year?) x 4 years = $2000-$4000. I spent $1500 on tires alone for the first 2 years of our current 2007 XC90 lease, and maintenance is sure to be higher in years 2-6 than 0-2. Second, your payment ignores sales tax at $601. Including sales tax (9.25% here in California) and using Chase's 5.61% interest rate for California the payment would be $661. This is roughly $98 more per month than the $563/mo lease available on a brand new car (7 passenger AWD), x 48 mos = $4700 Third, to "equalize" the options lacking from the car you've identified, the 7-passenger rear seats were a $2500 option but lets say you can somehow find and install the rear seats for $1250, and install bluetooth for $400. So, at the end of 4 years in 2013 you've paid off your 2007 CPO car and own it outright, but the difference in cost of ownership ranges from $8,350-$10,350. Will the "equity" in your 2007 model be worth more than $8,350-$10,350 in 2013 (as a 6-7 year old car)? The residual value for the above 2009 lease (AWD 7) in 2013 is $12,397, so $8,350-$10,350 for a 2007 model with higher miles doesnt seem that far off, plus as a CPO owner you take maintenance and RV risk. If the lease RV is below-market at lease-end the lessee can buy the car and capture any upside. Conversely, if the the RV is above-market at lease-end the lessee doesn't suffer any losses, whereas an owner will suffer the loss. The future market value risk is borne by the bank and the CPO purchaser. Do you look at this any differently? If so, I'd be curious to understand your analysis and how you conclude that buying CPO is better. The Subaru deal sounds pretty good.
|
|
|
Replying to: goucla (Sep 03, 2009 9:56 pm) The cost of ownership really depends on what type of maintenance I choose. The local mainekee can perform the basic tire rotation and oil changes inexpensively. Based on these examples were are at a point where a CPO buy and a new lease might cost the same after 48 months. The leased car goes away whereas the CPO is being kept. 2 more years with no car payments makes it a win-win situation. Before, when the XC90 was a $429/month deal for 24 months, it was a NO-brainer. I do have a 2008 XC90 with all options but Navi. 24 month lease of course. |
|
|
My 2009 XC-90 two year lease is running out in several months. The residual on it is about $31K. I've heard stories about Volvo Financial knocking as much as $10K off the residual for a buyout. Is this possible, a reality, anyone with any knowledge? Would seem to make some sense given the deals on a new XC-90, and the very depressed value of used ones. If this is not fact, we're in the market again...... |
|
|
Replying to: fantom (Sep 04, 2009 8:19 am) XC90 prices are going up at the auctions. $31k is about right for an 09 if its a 6 cyl.
|
|
|
Replying to: volvomax (Sep 04, 2009 10:16 am) Is VFNA knocking anything off? Add a couple of grand to the residual, and we can purchase a new XC-60.
|
|
|
Replying to: fantom (Sep 04, 2009 8:19 am) |
|
You are here:
Forums
Prices Paid: Buying & Leasing Experiences Volvo XC90 Lease Questions
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Volvo XC90
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
