Sign In Join

Infiniti G35 G37 Lease Questions

3301 messages,  Last post on Jul 04, 2008 at 7:06 PM

You are in the Prices Paid: Buying & Leasing Experiences Forum. Your Hosts are car_man & kyfdx

What is this discussion about? Infiniti G35, Infiniti G37, Car Leasing, Coupe, Sedan


Messages Page 304 of 331
1
...
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
...
331
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#3027 of 3301
Why not buy a G37 with such low interest rates? by athens
May 18, 2008 (10:35 am)
Reply
Doesn't anyone buy their cars anymore? I bought my G35 new in 2003. Have 55K miles. To date has cost me $0.65 cents per mile. And I own the car.
 
The leasing customers, if not exercising the option to buy for high residual value, will have to sign a new lease, whether Infiniti or another marque. Over 6 years the per mile lease cost will be about $0.58 cents per mile. And they will still have ZERO equity in the good, unless they buy at the high residual value.
 
If I want to get out of the car (which I do not at present) I can likely obtain a return of $20K if I were to sell in today's market. That would drop the ownership cost of the car down to $0.27 per mile. That is about HALF what leasing for 72 mos. would cost (assuming costs to lease the new vehicle do not increase).
 
That is a net savings of $17,000! Which could earn you $6500 in bank interest, alone, in 60 months.
 
With the long warranty that Infiniti offers there is no compelling reason I can see to getting out of the car after 36 months.
#3028 of 3301
Re: Why not buy a G37 with such low interest rates? [athens] by SergeyM
May 18, 2008 (12:11 pm)
Reply

Replying to: athens (May 18, 2008 10:35 am)

You need to compare apples to apples. In other words what is financially more beneficial to buy a car and trade it in 2-3 years or lease the same car for 2-3 years? The moment you change any of the terms your comparison becomes meaningless. It does not make much sense to say if I buy a car and drive it for 10 years it will cost me less that five 2-year leases. You may as well buy a Corolla. It would cost you much less.
#3029 of 3301
Re: Why not buy a G37 with such low interest rates? [athens] by gooddeal2
May 18, 2008 (12:27 pm)
Reply

Replying to: athens (May 18, 2008 10:35 am)

I highly doubt that you can get 20K on a '03 G w/ 55K miles. I think it's more like a 15-16K car at trade or 17-18K at retail, just my guess.
#3030 of 3301
Lease to purchase comparison is "Apples to Apples" by athens
May 18, 2008 (2:37 pm)
Reply
You could buy a home, just as could lease that same home, provided the parties agreed to terms. There are advantages to either means of obtaining legal use and possession.
 
The comparison is absolutely valid. It concerns the same vehicle. The G35. It is not a comparison between a G35 and a Corolla.
 
If you lease, unless you exercise the option to purchase based upon the claimed residual value, which few people do because the terms are for a fixed rate that is anticipated three years in advance, you are going to be obligated to either buy or lease another car. (Except perhaps if you will be relying solely on public transport.)
 
My calculations are the purely the costs of ownership vs. leasing. After six continual years of leasing, assuming monthly lease payments will not change upon concluding the first lease and entering a second lease, the cost of rental possession is 2X that of ownership. A lessor is responsible for all wear and tear just as an owner. That is the basis of the comparison.
 
I'm not comparing the merits relative to someones ability to afford the purchase or the motorist's desire to be in a new model car every few years.
 
Solely cost.
 
My G35 is in pristine condition. Not modded. (Unlike 70 % of them). Not natty inside like most cars are after one year. Trade-in probably your right, not more than 15K. That is why is NEVER trade my cars in. When I went to trade my 1997 M3 at a BMW dealer in 2001 they offered 24K. I sold it private party for $30K and the current owner said it was far and away the best used car he saw out of 6 others. For about a year after buying the M3 from me he even called to tell me how great the car was on various road trips to the East Coast.
#3031 of 3301
Re: Lease to purchase comparison is "Apples to Apples" [athens] by brian62
May 18, 2008 (5:03 pm)
Reply

Replying to: athens (May 18, 2008 2:37 pm)

Athens, have you considered the cost of maintenance in years 4-6 vs. 1-3? In the case of a G35, I would guess that you are spending 3-4k in years 4-6 vs. 1-1.5k in years 1-3. Over a 6 year period you will spend 4-6k in maintenance on a single car vs. 2-3k in years 1-3 on two separate cars.
 
One other very important note. If your are in an accident which requires body repair, you just lost 10% of the value of YOUR car. If you lease the car, then the bank just lost 10% in value. I experienced this in the last car I purchased, because it was in an accident it could not be sold as certified or even sold at Carmax, you will be offered wholesale price as a trade or sell it yourself.
 
I would also disagree with your comment regarding leasing being 2x that of ownership.
I just leased a G35 for $485 a month (including tax) for 36 months. If I did the same again in 3 years, I will pay a total of $34,920 over the 6 years.
If I purchased the same car, at the same price (omitting the acquisition fee from the purchase) and paying tax on the full purchase price the total is $36,075, financing the car for 72 months at 4% interest (which I don't think you can get today) the total monthly payment is $564.39 for total payments of $40,636.
Payment wise, the purchase is $4,500 more expensive and you have at least $1,500 in additional maintenance for a total cost of $6,000. But in turn, you have a car which you own free and clear. You will likely be able to sell the car for more then $6,000 and that will be your savings of buying vs. leasing.
 
I also believe that insurance on a late model car is more expensive then a new car, this has been the case in the last 2 cars I have purchased.
 
Bottom line, some people Buy, some people Lease, some people buy new, some buy used. While leasing will cost you more (but certainly not double), some people get value for the extra expense.
#3032 of 3301
Re: Lease to purchase comparison is "Apples to Apples" [brian62] by ez061825
May 18, 2008 (5:12 pm)
Reply

Replying to: brian62 (May 18, 2008 5:03 pm)

Is it true that a lease payment is easier to write off on your taxes than a purchase payment, especially if you own your own business? If so, this may be another reason to lease. What do you think?
#3033 of 3301
Re: Lease to purchase comparison is "Apples to Apples" [brian62] by brodway
May 18, 2008 (5:23 pm)
Reply

Replying to: brian62 (May 18, 2008 5:03 pm)

Brian, very well articulated...I would also add that the equity that is left in the vehicle after 6 years is somewhat mitigated by the cost of capital that could have been invested in an alternative investment that would have yielded a return and then reinvested. When you also consider that the warranty runs out after 3-4 years, there is an additional cost of either purchasing bumper to bumper coverage or taking on a risky proposition that in the event a major part breaks down your savings in the purchase quickly begin to evaporate.
 
Overall, its a toss up. With the current lease rates and residuals being offered by IFS, i believe the way to go is leasing instead of buying. I've evaluated both options and really find the argument of saving on a purchase versus a lease in today's market lacking conviction.
#3034 of 3301
Re: Lease to purchase comparison is "Apples to Apples" [athens] by sonofjay
May 18, 2008 (5:26 pm)
Reply

Replying to: athens (May 18, 2008 2:37 pm)

Having owned a BMW for your years you are undoubtedly aware of the costs of cars, in particular once they are outside of their warranty. I take the opposite approach you did. I find cars are a very poor investments. My 2002 BMW 325XI is the reason I am now looking at a lease. When you learn all the names of all the service advisors at your local dealer and put $2k plus into the car every year then it becomes apparent that ownership its not always the best option when outside of warranty. Now, I agree what may be true for BMW may not be true for Infiniti. I know my 7 year old Honda I had before my 325xi was rock solid. But that's the risk of ownership. Maintenance and upkeep are about the same in the first 2-3 years for either option. The hope is that a car out of warranty, will run trouble free and not cost you any major repairs. Stay away from BMW if that is the case. Just my $0.02
#3035 of 3301
Question by sonofjay
May 18, 2008 (5:34 pm)
Reply
Stupid question... is the first months payment required at lease signing? I see a lot of people do it and it is simply to reduce the cost for the next payments? Or in other words if you wait a month to make your first payment does it cost you more? It makes sense to me to pay the bank/doc/title upfront and finance the rest but I do not see why making a payment in advance is done. Is the idea to reduce the monthly payment (because of the saved finance charges on the early payment) or does not making a payment cost you more per month than say the lease calculators figured your payment should be per month.
 
I guess the question is if I do not include the first payment a signing does it raise my monthly payment?
 
Thanks -S
#3036 of 3301
Re: Lease to purchase comparison is "Apples to Apples" [ez061825] by brodway
May 18, 2008 (5:37 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ez061825 (May 18, 2008 5:12 pm)

Brian. From my experience writing off vehicle usage, i have been advised by my tax professional that only a portion of the lease payment can be written off as a business expense. Although this seems to be a gray area as far as tax reporting is concerned, the right of way of reporting the vehicle expense is account for the % of usage ( personal/business ). Its hard to convince an auditer that you use the car 100% of the time for business. I also believe travel to work and back where the distance is less than 50 miles each way does not qualify as a travel expense. My opinion is that unless your tax return is flawed or blatantly fraudelent, you won't be audited if you write off your entire lease as a business expense.
 
As far as a purchase is concerned, the tax code specifies that the depreciation of the vehicle is the actual expense of usage. The depreciation value of the vehicle may vary in different years of the life of the vehicle.

Messages Page 304 of 331
1
...
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
...
331
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement