Sign In Join 



Honda Accord Lease Questions

3630 messages,  Last post on Dec 06, 2009 at 9:12 PM

You are in the Prices Paid: Buying & Leasing Experiences Forum. Your Hosts are car_man & kyfdx

What is this discussion about? Honda Accord, Car Leasing, Coupe, Sedan


Messages Page 339 of 364
1
...
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
...
364
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#3378 of 3630
Re: Was this deal a good one? [Car_man] by koftheworld
Jul 18, 2009 (1:34 pm)
Reply

Replying to: Car_man (Jul 16, 2009 2:07 am)

Thanks for the reply Car_man! Is the selling price the "agreed upon value of the vehicle" on the contract? If so it was $18,867.90.
#3379 of 3630
Re: Low EXL-V6 w/Nav residual [kingpcgeek] by avalon2000
Jul 18, 2009 (1:58 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kingpcgeek (Jul 17, 2009 9:23 am)

Being that I have already leased an Acura TL-S & two Honda EXL-V6's all with navigation, I have to say that the Honda unit [I think Alpine manufactured] is far superior than any of the add-on windshield types, and I've used almost all of them on other vehicles, and once hooked one up to one of the Hondas to see the difference, as it was very inferior. Also, the built-ins have dead reckoning whereby if you lose the satellite it automatically switches to the wheel spin to calculate your location, then self-correcting as needed once it picks up the satellite again.
 
If only someone would figure out how to get the portable units off the windshields and into some universal slip-in space in the dashboard wherein it would also hook into a built-in roof top GPS antenna, then I'd consider it.
 
Also, had OnStar in my 2003 TL-S, w/Nav as a separate factory built in. Have to say that OnStar is fabulous, worth every penny! Why Acura dropped it I'll never know. I now have it in my 2007 Saab 9-7X 5.3 SUV, and it is still wonderful, it now has turn-by-turn navigation, though I also have the factory built in nav anyway.
#3380 of 3630
Re: Low EXL-V6 w/Nav residual [avalon2000] by sleepysoo
Jul 18, 2009 (6:16 pm)
Reply

Replying to: avalon2000 (Jul 18, 2009 1:58 pm)

I agree...the factory installed navi is SOOOO much better than the portable ones. i've had several acuras and accords with navi, and i have to say, they're WAYYYYY better than mercedes or bmw's navis.
 
i also wish they had some kind of universal space that we can put a portable navi into without putting it on the windshield...it's so annoying!!!
 
but, if i could afford it, i would have most definitely gotten the accord with navi...i just love honda/acura's navigation systems! for the amount i use navigation and for the convenience of it, it's totally worth my money. too bad i'm poor these days!!!
#3381 of 3630
July MF by ja54
Jul 19, 2009 (6:22 am)
Reply
Hello,
 
Does anyone know the July MF and residual for an EX-L, 12k/yr 36 mo lease?
 
Thanks,
#3382 of 3630
Re: July MF [ja54] by fmejia83
Jul 19, 2009 (7:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: ja54 (Jul 19, 2009 6:22 am)

I was told recently that for a 4 cyl coupe EX-L with navi residual is 51% and for tge top tier MF is .00171. Hope this helps
#3383 of 3630
Accord Coupe 2009 Lease Prices by cinbee
Jul 17, 2009 (6:36 pm)
Reply
I have been trying to negotiate a lease for a 2009 Accord Coupe LX-S or EX for the past 3 weeks, and I seem to be hitting a wall. I'm working through the internet department as I have in the past for 5 other leases. I thought the economy was bad, but I can't get what I want, unless I'm being unreasonable. What do you think?
 
So far my quotes for an LX-S 36 mo. 12,000 miles with $1000 out of pocket have been about $280 per month with tax and for the EX same numbers about $300 per month with tax. All the dealers I am talking/seeing are about the same, give or take a dollar or two. Is this high, or is this about right?
 
I'm limiting myself to $1000 out of pocket since I have a Mazda to return on a lease with a $400 return fee, plus God only knows what excess wear and tear they will charge although car in good shape.
 
Any ideas or thoughts appreciated! I'm about ready to just buy a bike!!!!
Both auto trans
#3384 of 3630
Re: 09 Accord EX [sleepysoo] by jlee8071
Jul 21, 2009 (8:04 pm)
Reply

Replying to: sleepysoo (Jul 17, 2009 8:41 am)

Thanks sleepysoo. Is the $237 lease payment before or after tax? I got a quote for $250 after tax for LX (3 yr/36K) with around $700 drive-off (1st month, license, doc fees)
 
thanks
#3385 of 3630
Re: 09 Accord EX [jlee8071] by sleepysoo
Jul 21, 2009 (10:42 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jlee8071 (Jul 21, 2009 8:04 pm)

it's after tax. but, it's with the OC tax rate. the drive offs sound right though!
 
assuming all the numbers are still the same (MF, residual, etc), that sounds like a decent deal. sounds like they're splitting the difference on the $1500 marketing incentive.
#3386 of 3630
Re: 09 Accord EX [sleepysoo] by jlee8071
Jul 21, 2009 (10:54 pm)
Reply

Replying to: sleepysoo (Jul 21, 2009 10:42 pm)

Thanks again.
 
I'm not sure if residual is the same. The sales person put LX at 57%. I guess your EX has higher residual? The money factor is 0.00171. Is 57% correct?
#3387 of 3630
2009 Honda Accord EX-L by markonline007
Jul 22, 2009 (5:52 am)
Reply
A few newbie items:
 
First, let me start by thanking the contributors to this post. I have learned so much in the past few weeks of reading about leases (and realized how badly I have been taken advantage of in past leases!). I have three questions:
 
1. When you call a dealership and ask for the money factor and residual on a particular vehicle, how does one know they are providing accurate information? They could give you a residual percent a point or two lower to hide some of the profit they are trying to get knowing that you will be calculating your own payment.
 
2. Having said that, could someone provide the latest money factor and residual % on a 2009 Honda Accord Sedan EX-L (no nav, V4) 36 month lease, 15K miles per year?
 
3. Why does the lease calculator on Edmunds.com ask for the mileage per year on the lease vehicle? If you are entering the residual you received from the dealer based on your mileage per year, what else is the form doing to the calculation with that information? I've been calculating on my own spreadsheet as I look at cars but if I'm not mistaken this is a flaw with the automated form.
 
Thanks again,
Mark

Messages Page 339 of 364
1
...
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
...
364
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement