- #3094 of 3631
-
Re: Great Deal! [XxHaimBonxX]
by ral2167
-
Feb 20, 2009 (4:31 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: XxHaimBonxX (Feb 20, 2009 3:21 pm)
how many miles per year>?
|
- #3095 of 3631
-
Re: Great Deal! [ral2167]
by XxHaimBonxX
-
Feb 20, 2009 (4:45 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: ral2167 (Feb 20, 2009 4:31 pm)
12K
|
- #3096 of 3631
-
Re: Great Deal! [XxHaimBonxX]
by dolsey01
-
Feb 20, 2009 (5:06 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: XxHaimBonxX (Feb 20, 2009 3:21 pm)
Same here, I pick up our TSX on Monday. Almost the same numbers too. I can point you in the right direction if you are in the Boston area.
Maybe we should start a new thread for Accord shoppers who bought a TSX, we are starting a trend!
|
- #3097 of 3631
-
Re: Great Deal! [dolsey01]
by XxHaimBonxX
-
Feb 21, 2009 (4:11 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: dolsey01 (Feb 20, 2009 5:06 pm)
sure, but why just limit to Accord. I'm 100% sure than the deal we got is much better than loaded Camry, Altima, Mazda6. Leases on those are at least $10-20 more per month.
|
- #3098 of 3631
-
Re: 2009 Accord Sedan LX-P [t_c]
by jhinsc
-
Feb 21, 2009 (5:31 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: t_c (Feb 20, 2009 1:47 pm)
It doesn't matter if you buy a Honda or Acura, you can get the payment down if you put enough cash down. You won't be able to accomplish what you want with no cash down. The negative equity is what's hurting you. Even then, you'll have to add that to more cash down to get the payment where you want, assuming you have great credit scores too. Ask the dealer to show you all the numbers involved - it will make more sense then.
|
- #3099 of 3631
-
Re: 2009 EX V6 with NAV deal [BullGator1]
by BullGator1
-
Feb 21, 2009 (11:14 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: BullGator1 (Feb 20, 2009 8:44 am)
Hoping someone can give some insight to my quote.
Thanks.
|
- #3100 of 3631
-
Re: Great Deal! [XxHaimBonxX]
by XxHaimBonxX
-
Feb 21, 2009 (6:35 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: XxHaimBonxX (Feb 21, 2009 4:11 am)
Funny thing today, a Mazda dealer called me back today with a quote on Mazda6, fully loaded, w/ navi. With absolutely $0 he wanted $441, which I thought was not too bad for $27K car. Residual 45%. When I told him the residual on TSX, and the deal I got, he was shocked. He said that if it was him, he would jump on that deal without thinking.
|
- #3101 of 3631
-
Re: 2009 Accord EXL V6 (no NAV) [Car_man]
by cargirl1710
-
Feb 22, 2009 (11:45 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: Car_man (Feb 04, 2009 3:50 am)
How long is the $1000 incentive on V6 Honda's good for?
I have been emailing dealers in southwest florida but their lease deals on the 09 honda accord EX-L V6 with Nav are ridiculous.
The lowest sales price I have gotten so far is 27,295, but the lease for 39 months, 15k/yr and 0down was 443/mo included tax, this was for this sales price.
The lowest lease price so far is 429/mo for the accord v6 with nav and leather and zero down.
They are not being very negotiable down here, the tsx on the other hand is almost a 100 less per month.
|
- #3102 of 3631
-
Re: 2009 Accord EXL V6 (no NAV) [cargirl1710]
by srq5363
-
Feb 22, 2009 (12:12 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: cargirl1710 (Feb 22, 2009 11:45 am)
I am pretty sure the dealer cash is thru 3/2. I contacted 5-6 dealers and all but two were unwilling to compete. I highly recommend you try Adam Lazar at Bradenton Honda, ask for a quote and tell him you are going to shop it around. Tell him you are looking for a price somewhere in the area of the lowest price others have posted here. Then email Kuhn Honda in Tampa and ask them to do better. I worked with Doug Kaseta. Both of these guys are excellent. I ended up with Bradenton but only because they were closer.
|
- #3103 of 3631
-
Re: 2009 Accord EXL V6 (no NAV) [cargirl1710]
by XxHaimBonxX
-
Feb 22, 2009 (1:35 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: cargirl1710 (Feb 22, 2009 11:45 am)
so get the TSX.
|