You are here:
Forums
Prices Paid: Buying & Leasing Experiences
Acura TSX Lease Questions

1541 messages, Last post on Nov 08, 2009 at 9:41 AM
You are in the Prices Paid: Buying & Leasing Experiences Forum. Your Hosts are car_man & kyfdx
|
Replying to: mcginsu (Nov 05, 2008 8:24 am) Acura's sales were off around 25% for the month of October. As bad as this is, it actually is better than the industry as a whole. Clearly Acura is going to need to continue to provide incentives on its vehicles to help them sell. However, eventually all automakers will cut production in response to the slowdown in consumer demand. They will not continue to crank out vehicles and increase incentives forever. I would not be surprised if the lease program on the TSX improved in the coming months, but I don't expect a huge fire sale. Car_man Host Prices Paid: Buying & Leasing Experiences Forum
|
|
|
Replying to: Car_man (Nov 05, 2008 6:46 pm) I noticed that the advertised lease deal on Acura.com is valid for November and December so it looks like Acura isn't planning on changing their lease numbers for two months. Note also that they do not require a security deposit to obtain the 0.00263 MF - at least that's what their web site details imply. Thanks |
|
|
Replying to: drtravel (Nov 05, 2008 9:24 pm) Does this make sense that the Accord and TSX lease deals are so close together? They were quoting me clear into the $500's for a loaded Accord, which goes right into TSX territory. I am sure I could probably get a loaded TSX for lower than this, give or take, it would not be to far off. Still the TSX might seem more attractive. I have made up my mind, the TSX is the car I want, I have looked at other cars, but I keep coming back to this car. Now if I can get my payments under $400 a month, then we got a deal. |
|
| Hello all I am ready to lease a 2009 TSX w/ Tech before the end of this year and would really need your helps in getting the best lease deal. I've been searching the internet a bit and found many people reporting that a TSX can be have with close to invoice price now. So my question is if my lease is going to be based on a negotiated price of let's say $30,000 is it possible to get a TSX w/Tech for Acura's advertised deal on a regular TSX which is $309/month? I would like to keep my down payment under $3000 if not lower. BTW I have 760 FICO and I'm in Southern California. | |
|
Replying to: waynetam (Nov 06, 2008 10:46 am) Some rough numbers for you: Say you lease a 2009 TSX w/Tech package for 36 months, 10K per year with a down payment of $2675 - just matching the web site. You say you can get the car at invoice. MSRP = 32,820 Cap cost = 30,241 (invoice) less 2675 = 27566 Residual is 32820 X 0.62 = 20348.40 Depreciation = (27566-20348.40)/36 = 200.49 Interest = (27566+20348.40) X 0.00263 = 126.02 Lease would be 200.49 + 126.02 = 326.51 plus TTL I would never put anything down on a lease - I'm sure all the lease experts agree with me on this point. If you do the same lease with nothing down the cap cost would be 30241, the payment increases to 407.84 plus TTL which is 81.33 more per month. Over the course of the lease you pay 81.33 X 36 = 2928 instead of the 2675 down. Of course this lease is only for 10K per year. For 15K per year the residual would be 32820 X 0.59 = 19363.80. The payment for nothing down is 432.60 plus TTL, the payment with 2675 down is 351.27 plus TTL. Don't shop based on a monthly payment. With a big enough down payment I can get the monthly payment to any number you want. BTW - I'm also in SoCal. If you make a deal be sure to let me know the details and from which dealer you got it from. Planet Acura seems to be the most aggressive in their e-mails but I'm not sure whether they will actually come through in the end. |
|
|
Replying to: drtravel (Nov 06, 2008 5:05 pm) ------------------------------------- Now, for that $0 down, $432.60 a month. Why would I want to get an Accord EX-L 4cyl with navi that supposedly has a payment that goes into the $500's. Does any of this make sense? Why does it seem that Accord lease is so high, or am I missing something?
|
|
|
Replying to: bvdj84 (Nov 06, 2008 5:34 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: drtravel (Nov 06, 2008 5:05 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: waynetam (Nov 08, 2008 11:01 pm) They add the CAP cost and residual, because they are seeking an average of those two numbers. The actual amount financed for lease purposes is the (CAP cost + residual) / 2. You don't see the divisor in the calculations, because it is accounted for within the money factor, itself. regards, kyfdx |
|
|
does anyone think I will be able to swing this deal before the end of the year? I'd like a 3 yr, 12k/yr lease for the 09 base. I have a trade in that is valued at $7100 (outstanding loan is $5500) per KBB's trade-in value. I would like to be at the $309/month with putting nothing down (except possibly 1st month's payment). based on the numbers in this thread, it would look like this: msrp: $29720 purchase: $25650 money factor: 0.00263 residual: 63% total pmt: $309 total pmt + tax: $332 I think the math works out to be about $600 over invoice, assuming that I get $1600 for my trade. is this reasonable?
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Prices Paid: Buying & Leasing Experiences
Acura TSX Lease Questions
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Acura TSX



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats