You are here:
Forums
Vans & Minivans
Mazda Mazda5
Mazda5

1355 messages, Last post on Nov 10, 2009 at 8:21 PM
You are in the Mazda Mazda5 Forum. Your Host is Karens
|
Replying to: maltb (Jan 29, 2007 10:21 am) When I bought my last car (also new) in 1998, the torque converters were refered to as "over-drive". For example, some of the older rental cars I have driven have an "over-drive" switch where the torque converter is disabled/enable. When I accelerated my Mazda5 Auto it quickly gets to 4th gear (as displayed), then revs up beyond 3000 but then drops down (presumably when the torque converter kicks in).
|
|
|
Replying to: idavidson (Jan 29, 2007 10:38 am) The torque converter has always been a means to allow variable slippage of the transmission's input shaft for getting underway, between shifts and when limited slippage will aid engine power to move the vehicle. Yes, your TQ will slip it's way into 4th gear and then lock when the power demand is palatable for the engine. It has no relation to overdrive and never has. |
|
|
|
|
In case you haven't already seen this video of the Premacy 23S (Mazda5): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thbjmDGCtOI
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: starlightmica (Feb 25, 2007 9:57 am) Thanks for sharing! (P.S. They really should bring that MPV over here to the states - looks NICE!) |
|
|
It's Tuesday, so that means it's time for our weekly gathering in the chat room! The Mazda Club Chat is on tonight. The chat room opens at 8:45PM ET Hope to see YOU there! Check out the schedule |
|
|
Funny that the Mazda5 GT owner's manual doesn't state that it has a timing chain, versus timing belt. Do others agree (well, that's what I found out on the web) that it has a timing chain, and that a chain is better than a belt (even though noisier) since it lasts longer? Thanks
|
|
|
Replying to: zbx (Feb 27, 2007 1:24 pm) As far as noise goes, it's not that big of a deal compared to everything else that moves under the hood. a belt drive system is cheaper to make but car manufacturers likely sold the noise thing to public to get their buy-in. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: idavidson (Jan 13, 2007 6:16 pm) |
|
|
Wow... like spring today! Hopefully real life won't intrude and we'll see you at the chat! The Mazda Club Chat is on tonight. The chat room opens at 8:45PM ET Hope to see YOU there! Check out the schedule |
|
|
My wife and I saw a 5 the other day in a parking lot for the first time. We were taken in by the beauty of this vehicle, and it's smaller size is appealing to us now that our kids are older and will be moving on soon. Because of this, we won't have a need for a vehicle as large as our current '03 MPV. My main concern with the 5 is its small powerplant and whether or not its underpowered. Every editorial I've read says it is underpowered, while many people who own them say the manually equipped version is actually fairly peppy, while the auto is just okay. We would have to have an auto as my wife would be the primary driver and she absolutely refuses to drive a manual. We haven't test driven one yet, but I doubt I'd be impressed with such a small engine. For the life of me, I can't figure out why Mazda decided to go with such a small powerplant in a vehicle that weighs roughly as much as the MPV. A better choice would've been to go with the tried and true 3.0 V-6. Add VVTI and you've basically got a rocketship minivan that would get incredibly good fuel economy. The other thing we must consider is the fact the our MPV will be paid off in 2 years and will still have relatively low miles (about 50K by then). Do we keep our PeeVee and have NO car payments, or start all over again with a new set of payments and a vehicle we possibly may not be happy with? Now if Mazda were to get smart and upgrade the engine to the 3.0 VVTI then it might be worth taking the plunge....
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Vans & Minivans
Mazda Mazda5
Mazda5
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Mazda MAZDA5



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats