- #355 of 378
-
Re: MPG expectations not there yet. [bobw3]
by lcostantino
-
Feb 27, 2009 (5:24 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: bobw3 (Feb 27, 2009 2:26 pm)
Actually, turn the wheel all you like, I think our 5's have electric steering and not pump-driven steering off a belt - woo hoo!
|
- #356 of 378
-
Re: MPG expectations not there yet. [lcostantino]
by tomas_elantra
-
Feb 28, 2009 (6:22 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: lcostantino (Feb 27, 2009 5:24 pm)
sbsteggs I guess it is what it is. The explanations make a bit of sence from the dealership, but then why am I getting 24-25mpg average with a brand new M5 like yourself? We have winter fuel mix here too, so my bet at this point is that the odometer is off a touch, which is nothing to worry about, just not what I would want to read if my car were brand new. And it's only a guess.
Now something I have noticed with my vehicle is when I am going about 50-60 and roll down the windows (the other day was warm and my 6yr old wanted to try out the windows) my ears hurt a bit, and my wife agreed... so is this normal?
|
- #357 of 378
-
Re: MPG expectations not there yet. [tomas_elantra]
by tomas_elantra
-
Feb 28, 2009 (9:04 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: tomas_elantra (Feb 28, 2009 6:22 am)
Let me mention two other things along with my new Mazda ownership, one is when we stop and put the vehicle in PARK the car will roll a few inches back or forth unless we are on a completely flat surface, something I never experienced with an automatic before. Secondly the car has a slight engine vibration while waiting at a stoplight, if I put it in neutral or park it goes away?
Nothing big, just my new experiences on the vehicle. Anyone have the same on their M5?
|
- #358 of 378
-
Re: Ear pain. [tomas_elantra]
by mohaha
-
Feb 28, 2009 (9:39 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: tomas_elantra (Feb 28, 2009 6:22 am)
I've definitely noticed the ear pain phenomenon. It's especially uncomfortable for me in the driver's seat when the only window opened is the front passenger window. The I assume it has something to do with the shape of the car, the path the air flow takes through the car, and perhaps a buildup of air pressure - though it still happens, to a lesser degree, when I simultaneously open the driver's window as well. Unfortunately, I don't have access to a wind tunnel to test my theories.
|
- #359 of 378
-
Re: MPG expectations not there yet. [tomas_elantra]
by vg33e power
-
Mar 02, 2009 (7:46 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: tomas_elantra (Feb 28, 2009 9:04 am)
Completely normal on the car rolling after putting on park and letting the brake pedal go, HOWEVER, "highly" not reccomended, and it is the simple more frequent mistakes people make everyday and then complain about premature transmission failure. PLease do not park your vehicles without applying the parking brake. Most people get to their destination put their car on "P" let go of the brake pedal and either apply parking brake...or not and basically put the complete strain of the weight of the vehicle solely on the transmission. The correct way to do this is arrive, put on "P" fully apply parking brake (not this one two click thing) and then let go of the brake pedal, and voila, guess what no more rolling motion of the vehicle and not loud "clunk" when you are trying to get the darn thing unstuck from "P" because all the weight of the vehicle was resting on your tranny rather then being held by the parking brake.
Engine vibration on these engines is a normal characteristic that they posses. Is it bad? No Is it annoying at times? Yes. But it is one of those things you will have to live with, I learned to live with it and now I do not even notice it.
Wind buffeting noise is annoying on our MZ5 because the shape of the car. If you think the front windows make the buffeting noise try lowering the rears, its even worse. It will ususlly go away if you roll down a front window.
|
- #360 of 378
-
Mazda5 Touring AT
by BMATT
-
Mar 04, 2009 (11:58 am)
-
|
|
I got 301 miles on 11.8 gallon of gas, which adds up to 25.5 MPG. Most of the driving is on the highway and little bit on the back roads.
|
- #361 of 378
-
last two tanks ~27.5 mpg
by dan5678
-
Mar 16, 2009 (4:23 pm)
-
|
Have less than 5k miles on it.
I've been sort of bummed from the get-go about the relatively high RPMs my manual five speed turns at 65-70mph. It got much worse when I read today that the Feds report that the 2010 Camaro w/ 3.6L V6+6speed manual is capable of 29mpg highway.
Don't see why I couldn't break 30 if Mazda had given us a 6-speed.
|
- #362 of 378
-
Re: last two tanks ~27.5 mpg [dan5678]
by coolmazda5
-
Mar 16, 2009 (5:11 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: dan5678 (Mar 16, 2009 4:23 pm)
Some time ago somebody from Europe was posting a shot of their speedo at around 100km/hr with its Mazda5 (2.0L), The pic also captured the RPMs, which were very close to mine when I hit ~60-65MPH on fifth gear, so I think a 6th might not help much as it would be geared similarly. It would be a hell of a lot more fun though 
|
- #363 of 378
-
by calvus805
-
Mar 18, 2009 (10:37 am)
-
|
|
sbsteggs, just looking to eliminate another possible source of poor mileage. You don't drive with one foot resting on the brake, right?
|
- #364 of 378
-
MPG 2008
by kivo
-
May 13, 2009 (3:12 pm)
-
|
I just checked my mileage and I got 24.1 for a 50-50 mix of driving. So it looks like I'm
right where I should be, in the middle between 21 and 27. My car only has 2000 miles on it, so it isn't even broken in yet. So far, I'm very pleased with the car.
|
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Vans & Minivans 
