Sign In Join 



Honda Civic vs Toyota Corolla vs Mazda3

879 messages,  Last post on Nov 25, 2008 at 2:57 PM

You are in the Honda Civic Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Honda Civic, Toyota Corolla, Mazda MAZDA3, Sedan


Messages Page 88 of 89
1
...
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#867 of 879
Re: Civic vs. Corolla vs. Mazda3 [droman] by thegraduate
Nov 24, 2008 (8:46 pm)
Reply

Replying to: droman (Nov 24, 2008 7:53 pm)

If you don't like road noise, you won't like the current-gen 3, especially with the 17" tires. That thing roars big-time on the highway; more noticeably than the Civic.
#868 of 879
Re: Civic vs. Corolla vs. Mazda3 [thegraduate] by shipo
Nov 25, 2008 (5:54 am)
Reply

Replying to: thegraduate (Nov 24, 2008 8:46 pm)

True and not so true. I just bought a Mazda3 i Touring with the 17" wheels, and yes, the factory Goodyear Eagle RS-A tires create quite a din inside the car at freeway speeds. Given the very poor reviews those tires get in winter conditions and tread life, I had them replaced yesterday with a set of Michelin Pilot Sport A/S tires, and presto-chango, the car is easily as quiet (if not quieter) as a Civic EX on the highway.
 
Anybody want to buy a set of 205/50 R17 Eagles RS-As with 700 miles on them? No? I didn't think so.
 
Best regards,
Shipo
#869 of 879
Re: Civic vs. Corolla vs. Mazda3 [shipo] by terceltom
Nov 25, 2008 (6:05 am)
Reply

Replying to: shipo (Nov 25, 2008 5:54 am)

In this area of interior road noise I guess it's safe to say that the Corolla is still the dominate car.
#870 of 879
Re: Civic vs. Corolla vs. Mazda3 [thegraduate] by droman
Nov 25, 2008 (6:43 am)
Reply

Replying to: thegraduate (Nov 24, 2008 8:46 pm)

You could be absolutely correct. I have never driven a 3, so it could be noisier than the Civic for all I know. I also agree with the post that states that the Corolla is probably the quietest. Toyotas are usually rock solid and quiet. Although this usually comes at the price of feeling "disconnected" from the driving experience. Totally off topic, but I just drove my mom's (age 67) 2001 Celica GT-S with 23000 miles on it. What a piece of crap. The engine was loud, underpowered and that thing rattled like an 84 Camaro Z28. Wasn't at all impressed with the handling either. I could not believe it was a Toyota. My Civic felt like a combination of a Porche (handling) and an Mercedes (quietness) after driving the Celica. Maybe I should drive her car more often!
#871 of 879
Re:Celica GT-S, Quietness [droman] by thegraduate
Nov 25, 2008 (9:13 am)
Reply

Replying to: droman (Nov 25, 2008 6:43 am)

...2001 Celica GT-S with 23000 miles on it. What a piece of crap. The engine was loud, underpowered...
 
I'll just assume that you didn't wind out the engine. It's only adequate at low-revs (not that different from the Civic Si), but takes off above 6,000 RPM. Of course, not many drive at that RPM often!
 
I also agree with the post that states that the Corolla is probably the quietest. Toyotas are usually rock solid and quiet. Although this usually comes at the price of feeling "disconnected" from the driving experience.
 
You're right, I believe. Toyotas tend to have good isolation relative to their competitors, which is both good and bad, depending on what you're after.
 
I'd really suggest driving the 3, with both the 16" wheels and the 17" wheels. Personally, I think I'd have a hard time springing for brand new tires on a brand new car, just to fix a noise issue (if I had an issue with it, that is... you may not!).
 
The best advice I can give is to check them all out for yourself, and take our advice with a grain of salt!
#872 of 879
Re:Celica GT-S, Quietness [thegraduate] by shipo
Nov 25, 2008 (10:23 am)
Reply

Replying to: thegraduate (Nov 25, 2008 9:13 am)

Personally, I think I'd have a hard time springing for brand new tires on a brand new car, just to fix a noise issue (if I had an issue with it, that is... you may not!).
 
I can honestly say that I'm not exactly thrilled with needing to buy new tires for my car, that said, few cars on the market today come stock with a tire and wheel set-up that I like, errr, at least without either ordering the car from the factory and/or paying for pricey dealer upgrades. So with that said, $500 for a new set of skins is actually much cheaper than the wheel and tire package I would have wanted to buy with either the Rabbit or the Civic.
 
FWIW, the fact that the Michelin Pilot Sport A/Ss are so much quieter than the Goodyear Eagle RS-As was an unintended benefit of the tire swap, the real
reason I bought the new tires was for better wet and snow covered road traction. After all, we've gotten over 120" of snow in our town during three of our last six winters, and with snow forecast for this week, I felt I couldn't mess around with "All-Season" tires that receive some of the worst wet and snow reviews I've ever read.
 
Best regards,
Shipo
#873 of 879
Re:Celica GT-S, Quietness [shipo] by thegraduate
Nov 25, 2008 (10:27 am)
Reply

Replying to: shipo (Nov 25, 2008 10:23 am)

Thanks for the follow-up response shipo.
 
Of late, I've become a fan of Bridgestone tires, especially considering how well they perform in wet situations (I've only driven them in one marginally wintry mix, less than an inch of snow on the ground). I have the Potenza G009 tires on my old Accord and they are wearing very well; no complaints on the wear of my Michelin tires on my 06 Accord either, although I won't replace them with the same tire most likely. I want something a little more comfortable and quiet than these hard-compoud, low-rolling resistance ones.
 
I've drug us off topic I'm afraid... I'm sorry! If you haven't seen photos of the 2010 Mazda 3 hatchback, they're now available. Check em out. I'm not sure since I haven't seen it in person yet, but it seems a little cartoony. The current model doesn't look dated to me, and I much prefer it based on the limited amount of photos I've seen.
#874 of 879
Re:Celica GT-S, Quietness [thegraduate] by shipo
Nov 25, 2008 (10:44 am)
Reply

Replying to: thegraduate (Nov 25, 2008 10:27 am)

If you haven't seen photos of the 2010 Mazda 3 hatchback, they're now available. Check em out. I'm not sure since I haven't seen it in person yet, but it seems a little cartoony. The current model doesn't look dated to me, and I much prefer it based on the limited amount of photos I've seen.
 
I have to agree, the 2010 model looks like the ugly offspring of a Mitsubishi Galant and a Cadillac CTS. Urrg, no thanks, I much prefer the graceful lines of the current Mazda3.
 
Best regards,
Shipo
#875 of 879
3 Hatchback by thegraduate
Nov 25, 2008 (10:57 am)
Reply

 

 
Note the sculpted sides as it approaches the rear-doors, the swoopy new rear- bumper, as well as the front-fender design.
#876 of 879
Re: 3 Hatchback [thegraduate] by aviboy97
Nov 25, 2008 (11:16 am)
Reply

Replying to: thegraduate (Nov 25, 2008 10:57 am)

Does anyone see a little 1st gen Inifini FX in the rear? I do.
 
That color, Celestial Blue, is a little "loud"....

Messages Page 88 of 89
1
...
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement