You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Honda Civic
Honda Civic vs Toyota Corolla vs Mazda3

879 messages, Last post on Nov 25, 2008 at 2:57 PM
You are in the Honda Civic Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
Replying to: eldaino (Dec 12, 2006 10:12 am)
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: aviboy97 (Dec 12, 2006 12:47 pm) How so? The most recent comparison places the Mazda 3 and Honda Civic against each other. While I think the 3 is a very nice car, I think you have overexaggerated some test numbers based on the Motor Trend article I read and have sitting in front of me now. Honda Civic LX - $17,555: 33 MPG 0-60 in 7.7 seconds Quarter Mile in 16.1 Top Speed 125 MPH Lane Change 64.6 MPH Mazda 3s Touring - $18,885 27 MPG 0-60 in 7.3 seconds Quarter Mile in 15.8 Top Speed 118 MPH Lane Change 66.3 MPH So, for an extra 6 MPG, you give up .4 seconds to 60 MPH, less than that in the quarter mile, and some extra grip. It's not a runaway, aviboy. If fuel economy is at all in consideration, the Civic may just top people's list. If max sport tops your list, then the 3 should be up your alley.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: coosamtn (Dec 12, 2006 12:51 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: coosamtn (Dec 12, 2006 12:51 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: aviboy97 (Dec 12, 2006 12:47 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: thegraduate (Dec 12, 2006 1:06 pm) I agree with the milage too; something i forgot to include in my post to avi: according to mt they averaged 6 mpg more; edmunds observed around seven. That is a big deal. I think, though, that the numbers you posted grad are for mt cars; my auto ex would never make it to sixty in under eight seconds. Mid nines and high eights at best but never that fast.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: eldaino (Dec 12, 2006 1:34 pm) These were MT cars. When we are talking things like tenths of a second in acceleration, nobody is going to be able to notice much of a difference. More noticeable would be throttle response, which is just a matter of how it is programmed. The Corolla I used to drive (my ex-GFs) was plenty quick, but around town it felt like it could be outrun by an iceberg because the throttle tip-in was so soft. More impressive on Mazda's behalf is braking, that is the only test where it showed a significant advantage on the Civic, and again, this is likely largely due to its smaller, less-sporty tires. Not an excuse, just the reason. |
|
|
Replying to: thegraduate (Dec 12, 2006 1:06 pm) I over exaggerated nothing, read my post again, and you will see "according to Edmunds...." In which they did a comparo between the 06 Civic and 06 Mazda3. Also, you will see my fuel estimate came directly from CR "real world" results, not Motor Trend. I did not make up anything I posted, I got them directly from editors who assessed these vehicles. We can go back and forth all day on who wrote what, how fast each car is and get different numbers every time. I will agree that if you are looking for fuel economy as your #1 requirement, buy the Honda, if it is sportyness you are looking for, buy the Mazda.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: aviboy97 (Dec 12, 2006 2:05 pm) We'll leave it there.
|
|
|
Replying to: thegraduate (Dec 12, 2006 2:14 pm)
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Honda Civic
Honda Civic vs Toyota Corolla vs Mazda3
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2011 Honda Civic
2010 Toyota Corolla
2010 Mazda MAZDA3



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats