Sign In Join 



Honda Civic vs Toyota Corolla vs Mazda3

879 messages,  Last post on Nov 25, 2008 at 2:57 PM

You are in the Honda Civic Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Honda Civic, Toyota Corolla, Mazda MAZDA3, Sedan


Messages Page 50 of 89
1
...
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
...
89
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#484 of 879
Re: Mazda3 MPG [eldaino] by socal2006
Dec 08, 2006 (3:33 pm)
Reply

Replying to: eldaino (Dec 08, 2006 12:47 pm)

I totally agree... If you can't appreciate how much better the 3 handles compared to the civic, you're probably better off with the civic.
 
Personally, I would say the 3 is several substantial notches ahead of the civic when it comes to "sportiness". In fact, in my driving, I would say the 3 is very fun to drive while the civic is pretty bland. The civic isnt a mush-mobile, but it's not very entertaining. I also find the 3 gives up little in terms of comfort compared to the civic (eg. I find the seats to be more supportive in the 3 and ride is not overly harsh).
 
But yea, the "sportiness" or w/e you want to call it is really the one area where the 3 really shines over the civic. If it's not noticeable, then the only drawbacks to the civic may be a weaker engine and styling (which is subjective).
 
Of course, the 3 gives up little to the civic in every other category including fuel consumption, comfort, build quality, reliability, resale value... etc. The civic wins in those, but not by a substantial amount. That's the why the 3 has been getting so much praise here in the States. It has the "fun factor" without losing too much of everything else.
#485 of 879
3 and The Civic by sandman46
Dec 08, 2006 (6:00 pm)
Reply
We happen to have both cars and I couldn't agree more. The 3 is definitely a "drivers car" while the Civic is the "perfect car". The Civic does so many things right and it's a great car for the majority. But the 3 is like a ride and it's fun to thrash it around. We love them both, but for different reasons.
 
The Sandman
#487 of 879
Re: Mazda3 MPG [socal2006] by eldaino
Dec 12, 2006 (10:12 am)
Reply

Replying to: socal2006 (Dec 08, 2006 3:33 pm)

I totally agree... If you can't appreciate how much better the 3 handles compared to the civic, you're probably better off with the civic
 
The civic is just as fun to thrash around. I can appreciate a fine handling car trust me. I've driven both vehicles extensively and there was nothing that i could do in the 3 that i couldn't do with the civic. And trust me i thrashed them about quite a bit. Is the 3 marginally better? Yes it is. Marginally. So marginally in fact that after you factor in fuel ecomomy and resale value, getting the 3 (to me) for sporting abilities doesn't make much sense. Get a true enthusiast car. The civic si could eat the 3 for lunch in the handling dept. and thier power and mileage figures are about the same.
 
I think the 3 is a very nice car, and i actually considered it very strongly at one point esp. the hatch version. But i personally adore the way the new civic looks, that and its horspower to engine size ratio, silky smooth transmission, outstanding fuel ecomomy and great dash layout made it the winner in my book. Do i bash anyone for having a 3? No but it certainly is not so much sportier that it makes the civic pale. Sandman you should toss your civic around...trust me its up to the task.
#488 of 879
Re: Mazda3 MPG [eldaino] by aviboy97
Dec 12, 2006 (12:47 pm)
Reply

Replying to: eldaino (Dec 12, 2006 10:12 am)

Marginally. So marginally in fact that after you factor in fuel economy and resale value, getting the 3 (to me) for sporting abilities doesn't make much sense
 
The handling is better then "marginal" much better. Edmunds slalom test showed the Mazda3 went through it at 69mph(quicker then the WRX, I know, hard to believe) and the Civic was 64.6. The Mazda3 is also 1 second quicker 0-60 and .8 in the quarter mile. Also, fuel economy, according to CR, is only 29-30mpg highway in the Civic . Resale value is the same.
#489 of 879
Re: Mazda3 MPG [eldaino] by coosamtn
Dec 12, 2006 (12:51 pm)
Reply

Replying to: eldaino (Dec 12, 2006 10:12 am)

eldaino, is the civic's emergency brake handle against your right leg a problem for you?
#490 of 879
Re: Mazda3 MPG [aviboy97] by thegraduate
Dec 12, 2006 (1:06 pm)
Reply

Replying to: aviboy97 (Dec 12, 2006 12:47 pm)

The Mazda3 is also 1 second quicker 0-60
 
How so? The most recent comparison places the Mazda 3 and Honda Civic against each other. While I think the 3 is a very nice car, I think you have overexaggerated some test numbers based on the Motor Trend article I read and have sitting in front of me now.
 
Honda Civic LX - $17,555:
 
33 MPG
0-60 in 7.7 seconds
Quarter Mile in 16.1 87 MPH
Top Speed 125 MPH
Lane Change 64.6 MPH
 
Mazda 3s Touring - $18,885
 
27 MPG
0-60 in 7.3 seconds
Quarter Mile in 15.8 88 MPH
Top Speed 118 MPH
Lane Change 66.3 MPH
 
So, for an extra 6 MPG, you give up .4 seconds to 60 MPH, less than that in the quarter mile, and some extra grip.
 
It's not a runaway, aviboy. If fuel economy is at all in consideration, the Civic may just top people's list. If max sport tops your list, then the 3 should be up your alley.
 
#491 of 879
Re: Mazda3 MPG [coosamtn] by thegraduate
Dec 12, 2006 (1:06 pm)
Reply

Replying to: coosamtn (Dec 12, 2006 12:51 pm)

I know the question wasn't directed at me, but at 6'4", the emergency brake in the Civic sedan was no problem.
#492 of 879
Re: Mazda3 MPG [coosamtn] by eldaino
Dec 12, 2006 (1:23 pm)
Reply

Replying to: coosamtn (Dec 12, 2006 12:51 pm)

not really. I'm only 5'8 and it never 'dug' into my leg like others have said. Your knees usually touch something when you sit a certain way and in the civic, its usually the ebrake handle. It was never ever an issue for me.
#493 of 879
Re: Mazda3 MPG [aviboy97] by eldaino
Dec 12, 2006 (1:26 pm)
Reply

Replying to: aviboy97 (Dec 12, 2006 12:47 pm)

i'm not one to go by numbers and like i said, the civic is just as capable. The 3 is shod with 17's in that test, and you can get them as an option, but the civic they tested has 16's. Its low numbers were also attributed to its tires; bridgestone turanza el 400s. Those are all season touring tires. The mazda has all seasons as well, but they were performance all seasons (usually either goodyear eagle rs-a's or toyo proxes.) Again its not mazdas fault the civic is shod like this, but handling is very dependent on tires as well. Even so, i'll take ACTUALLY driving both cars and putting them to thier limits in the REAL world over what some article has said. They are good places to start, but the civic handles just as competently nonetheless.

Messages Page 50 of 89
1
...
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
...
89
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement