Sign In Join 



Chevrolet Corvette Z06

221 messages,  Last post on Oct 15, 2009 at 5:37 PM

You are in the Chevrolet Corvette Forum. Your Host is claires

What is this discussion about? Chevrolet Corvette, Coupe


Messages Page 17 of 23
1
...
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
...
23
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#155 of 221
Hi, folks... by claires HOST
Feb 14, 2006 (10:28 pm)
Reply
I apologize for not stepping in sooner. The lemon law issues and critiques of GM are dragging this discussion off-topic at this point.
 
Those who'd like to continue discussing GM's policies/practices, customer service, and warranty issues will find plenty of takers in the News & Views and Smart Shopper Forums.
 
Drive on over and see me!
#156 of 221
Re: Huge problem with my new C6 Z06!!! [russla] by jpstax1
Feb 15, 2006 (6:16 pm)
Reply

Replying to: russla (Feb 14, 2006 1:54 pm)

I thought all LS7 engines were hand-built, with only one technician involved from start to finish. In fact, there was one on display at the Chicago Auto Show yesterday. It looked like it had lot more moving parts and was much more complex than the other V8 engines on display. I wonder how much actual testing went into the development phase of this engine? To me, using a motor with a dry-sump lubrication system could be a disaster waiting to happen, given enough running time. Since it's based on the C6R engine, maybe more testing should have been done to ensure long-term reliability. Am I right? I read where it took GM several years to develop the 5.3 (DOD) engine.
#157 of 221
Just drove the C6 Z06 at Spring Mt. Motorsports Park by starrow68
Feb 18, 2006 (1:54 pm)
Reply
Fantastic Rocketship, just loafing around, wasn't about to push it when only doing a few laps, I was still doing 10mph faster at the end of the back straight and braking earlier since I wasn't comfortable to depend on brakes that I know are better but I'd only used for about 8 minutes. Biggest surprise was how docile the whole package was compared to my coupe and the school C5 Z06's, loafed one lap, pushed a couple corners where I was very comfortable on the second lap and then got well beyond the C5's on a third lap but still taking it very easy in the high speed over 100mph corners and comming on the straights where there were walls and limited runoffs.
 
BTW, just a few weeks after they got the car it turned up with a noisy valve train and GM swapped the engine in a week. FWIW
#158 of 221
Re: Just drove the C6 Z06 at Spring Mt. Motorsports Park [starrow68] by jpstax1
Feb 18, 2006 (4:49 pm)
Reply

Replying to: starrow68 (Feb 18, 2006 1:54 pm)

Here's proof that the C6 Z06 is as fast as some reports say it is:
 
http://www.dragtimes.com/2006-Chevrolet-Corvette-Videos-7055.html
#160 of 221
Re: Just drove the C6 Z06 at Spring Mt. Motorsports Park [slvrm] by teamzr1
Feb 20, 2006 (7:46 pm)
Reply

You say you had the car 3 months, if the block in fact was cracked from the getgo the engine would not of held compression, water or oil and would never have passed the GM build tests before being shipped out of BG. In any case engine would have been running very badly.
 
You or someone drove car for 3 months so again there is no way the block had been cracked all that time. Impossible.
 
The no start is a common problem esp with a C6 where if shifter is not put in reverse then the NO KEY system never goes to sleep so that alone would not get you a brand new car.
 
As to engine, someone did that damage, if it was the dealer's people or someone taking it on a joy ride but the fact that no others have had a block crack says you lose in any court action since anyone with engine knowledge knows you cannot drive a cracked block for 3 months and not know about it.
 
If your to sue anyone it would be the dealer if you can prove engine was fine and not leaking when you took it in else they will insist you drove over something and did the damage.
It may also be the tech in replacing starter ( which was not the real problem as to no start/ low voltage) torqued the bolts too much and they cracked the block.
 
In any case for Lemon law to kick in dealer has 3 bites of apple to fix it and at worst LL would allow a buy back for another Z06 and you pay the cost differences.
 
GM does not have to give a new car when warranty is to replace faulty parts and if GM decides it was done by abuse they do not even have to honor the warranty.
#161 of 221
And with a good sense of humor ... by starrow68
Feb 23, 2006 (8:47 am)
Reply
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/highway1/la-hy-neil14dec14,1,4188807.st- - ory?coll=la-news-highway_1
 
Just what the doctor ordered, if you want to pay $20k extra ...
#162 of 221
Re: Huge problem with my new C6 Z06!!! by jb_turner
Feb 24, 2006 (7:17 am)
Reply
alenatasevich1 makes some good points to back up his assertion that he needs to be compensated with a new car however I feel that russla has stated some good common sense also. What will eventually matter is what documents were signed at delivery and what the lemon laws are for the state.
 Lets use alenatasevich1's situation and use an Impala or a Korean car... do you think a replacement would also be warranted? although an Impala is not an 80k car however it has value none the less to the owner. A company can not stay in business if it replaced repairable cars with brand new cars.
#163 of 221
Re: URGENT: Huge problem with my new C6 Z06!!! [russla] by seattleslew
Feb 26, 2006 (7:48 pm)
Reply

Replying to: russla (Feb 12, 2006 6:59 pm)

They should give you a new car. BUT my friend had an
'02 M3. Transmission failed three times. BMW kept replacing/fixing it, but finally he got sick of it and traded in the car for a newer M3. No tranny problems yet with the replacement. My opinion is BMW should have replaced his car too, but I just wanted you to know you aren't alone out there, other manufacturers have treated other customers the same way.
#164 of 221
questions for the gearheads by seattleslew
Feb 28, 2006 (5:03 pm)
Reply
I've been reading the Z06 numbers and they sound incredible. I want one but I can't afford it. I had a few Qs for the experts.
 
The Z06 is a supercar and the 400hp vette is not bad. Why does Chevy leave the engine up front? Is there any technical reason or is it just that their assemly lines are set up to do front-engine cars? Is there any REAL advantage to a mid or rear engine or is it just ferrari and porsche hype?
 
Why doesn't the Z06 (or the Enzo for that matter) have a supercharger on it? Could a supercharger coupled with a smaller (possibly tougher) engine keep the weight down? I've read about racing engines generating 700+ HP out of less than 3L of displacement. Have computers and better intake designs obviated the need for superchargers?
 
What does it take to get 10s in a quarter mile? Hopped up EVOs can do it, but it seems cars that cost much MUCH more can't. What gives? Is it marketing? Are these EVOs going to wear out in, like, a week? Can the EVOs do anything other than rocket down a straight line?

Messages Page 17 of 23
1
...
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
...
23
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement