You are here: Forums Wagons Chrysler PT Cruiser Chrysler PT Cruiser Owners: MPG-Real World Numbers

Chrysler PT Cruiser Owners: MPG-Real World Numbers

138 messages,  Last post on Apr 06, 2009 at 6:09 AM

You are in the Chrysler PT Cruiser Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Chrysler PT Cruiser, Fuel Efficiency (MPG)

Messages Page 10 of 15 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 15 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

#85 of 138 PT Turbo MPG? by roguej Jan 21, 2008 (5:23 pm)
Thanks for the response. Willie I love the look of my PT. Tedebear, thanks for the tip about the K&N filter. Have to check into that. The first week I ran with premium gas and this week I thought I'd try regular. The car is still telling me avg of 18.4 to 18.9 mpg. As from about a high mile I'm driving only highway (50 miles a day, 68 mph avg). So very little stop and go for the most part. I'm astounded about seeing some of the mentions of getting 22 + mpg. So I'm not sure what to think about it. Again it a Turbo GT so I don't know if that has anything to do with it. Maybe it will get better as the weather gets warmer or the engine get more broken in.   Thanks again, Rogue
#86 of 138 Re: Chrysler PT Cruiser Owners: MPG-Real World Numbers [tedebear] by 05ptconvluvr Jan 22, 2008 (10:01 am)
Replying to: tedebear (Jan 11, 2008 2:37 pm) I have an 05 PT Convrt Turbo Touring edition. I was averaging about 19 city/22 hwy for the longest time. THEN I got a K&N airfilter and have a solid 25mpg. Usually about 26-7 hwy,but have ALWAYS gotten at least 23.5 city since adding the K&N. It has more than paid for itself in gas savings. And SO EASY to do. Just open the air filter box, take out the old paper one and drop in the K&N. I swear by this filter. Have not had to clean it yet. I got mine on autoanything.com for a lower price than anywhere else I looked. The engine runs smoother because it breathes easier, thus the better mgp.
#87 of 138 poor mpg by hhrguy Jan 25, 2008 (7:13 pm)
So why oh why do (did) any of us put up with the crappy fuel economy of the cruiser? Sure, it's a cool looking car, but still is a neon. It rides, brakes, and steers like a neon, and gets worse fuel economy. Chrysler could take note of ANY other cars on that platform and FIX the problem! I had it with my cruiser, and sold it after lothing it for 3 years of bad mileage, poor cornering, and a "cute" but SMALL gas tank, only to move to the Chevy HHR. WOW... G.M. found a way to be cool looking, and get better miles out of the same liter size. Better pick up, and braking. Shorter steering radius, and boy, It's quiet inside too! Never again will I be "held up" by some fast talking salesman. WE ALL need to send e-mails of displeasure to Chrysler. I did that , and my response was to " check out some of our other models, they might suit you better" Chrysler has had a bad reputation for some years for poor mileage, weak transmissions, and rapid wearing brakes. I think I'll stay with a company that truly wants to improve the quality of their product, and not just be "cute"   hhrguy Replies to this message: jwelsh (Jan 25, 2008 7:40 pm)
#88 of 138 Re: poor mpg [hhrguy] by jwelsh Jan 25, 2008 (7:40 pm)
Replying to: hhrguy (Jan 25, 2008 7:13 pm) Motor trend lists the difference in highway miles between the HHR and the pt as 1 mile per gallon. Looking at the car ads on tv, I don't see much difference between the pt and them Alot of car ads show the highway miles as 28-29. I don't understand what people are doing to get the low mpg they are claiming. I have always gotten in the high 20's on the highway and that is the average with the city and stops at intersections. They also show the powertrain warranty for the hhr as 3 years and the pt as 7. Also, the off road assistance for the two as hhr-3 and pt-7.
#89 of 138 Re: PT Turbo MPG? [tedebear] by camshot2 Jan 25, 2008 (9:24 pm)
Replying to: tedebear (Jan 18, 2008 7:23 pm) "You can do things like removing the silencers..."      Can you please explain what is meant by the term "silencers"? I am not familiar with a part by that description. How dumb am I really?   Thanks for enlightening me... Regards, Bill Welch Replies to this message: tedebear (Jan 25, 2008 9:56 pm) tedebear (Jan 25, 2008 11:28 pm) camshot2 (Jan 27, 2008 8:14 am)
#90 of 138 Re: PT Turbo MPG? [camshot2] by tedebear Jan 25, 2008 (9:56 pm)
Replying to: camshot2 (Jan 25, 2008 9:24 pm) Hi Bill,   The silencers are plastic pieces that cover part of the intake tubes in the air intake box. They are there to reduce engine noise.   I removed them from my wife's Cruiser and I didn't notice any increase in the noise. She has the turbo version, so I don't know if the silencers are different in the regular models. Replies to this message: tedebear (Jan 25, 2008 11:28 pm) camshot2 (Jan 27, 2008 8:14 am)
#91 of 138 Re: PT Turbo MPG? [tedebear] by tedebear Jan 25, 2008 (11:28 pm)
Replying to: tedebear (Jan 25, 2008 9:56 pm) Bill,   Do a Google search for something like pt cruiser airbox silencer. There are lots of discussions about it. Listed below are two.   http://www.ptcruiserlinks.com/forum/general-turbo-discussions/4953-remove-silenc- er.html   http://www.ptcruiserclub.org/forum/Airbox_and_lower_silencer_removal_Q_P163193.h- tm
#92 of 138 Re: PT Turbo MPG? [tedebear] by camshot2 Jan 27, 2008 (8:14 am)
Replying to: tedebear (Jan 25, 2008 9:56 pm) Thanks for the replies to this inquiry. I will check them out today and see if they are in there. I figured they were something like the removal of the cover on a 2 barrel carb of the past, what a cool throaty sound THAT made...lol. Later on, Bill
#93 of 138 Re: Gas Mileage/Trip Computer [jbw929] by jwelsh Feb 19, 2008 (11:21 pm)
Replying to: jbw929 (Mar 11, 2006 11:28 am) I have a 2006 pt marine blue Touring with auto trans. I bought the k&N air filter. Today, I reset the trip calculator. While it does show the previous amg at first, it does reset it. Going 15 miles on the highway, It got up to 30.5 mpg. On the way home, it showed 28 mpg.
#94 of 138 Interesting by camshot2 Feb 20, 2008 (6:54 am)
Do you say that the 30.5 was before the K&N? I have been thinking about trying anything to up the mpg, but if your experience is an example of what a K&N does, maybe that is not the choice. Keep us posted please of your further results. Thanks, Willie D 2002 PT Limited

Messages Page 10 of 15 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 15 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

You are here: Forums Wagons Chrysler PT Cruiser Chrysler PT Cruiser Owners: MPG-Real World Numbers