Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Wagons Chrysler PT Cruiser Chrysler PT Cruiser Owners: MPG-Real World Numbers
138 messages, Last post on Apr 06, 2009 at 6:09 AM
You are in the Chrysler PT Cruiser Forum. Your Host is kcram
|
|
|---|---|
|
Replying to: pttopless (Mar 07, 2007 10:01 am) |
|
|
I've been holding off to post...finally have 1800 miles on my 06 Limited with a 5 speed manual I got the end of December. First tanks have been 19.5, 21.5, 23.5...all in mixed driving but majority of the miles in town. For the tanks all in town it seems like 20-22 mpg is going to be typical for me. My trip computer is +/- 2mpg consistantly when comparing and reseting at fill up... |
|
i have a 01 pt cruiser with 75,700 miles i get between 280 and 300 miles per tank.( if i drive 65 miles per hr) if i punch it or go faster i will get 230 to 250 per tank. so if you want better milage you must slow down i know it is hard to do but with the price of gas going up,you do what you have to do. i bought this pt used have had it for 6 months and i like the car and love the body.( black on black) bought a used care warrenty from AAA 
|
|
The Cruiser has been out for 5 or 6 years. It is a small car and should get 25 mpg in city and over 30 on highway. But it doesn't and Chrysler has made no attempt to improve it. Each year the same inefficient engine, the same crummy mileage. This car is the right size for a hybride and I would buy it in a minute if it were. I don't understand it.
|
|
|
Replying to: martin44 (Apr 09, 2007 8:52 am)  PT Cruiser 2.4 Limited (Manual)ECONOMY Combined Cycle 25.1 mpg Extra Urban Cycle 32.3 mpg Urban Cycle 18.1 mpg PT Cruiser 2.2 CRD (Manual) ECONOMY Combined Cycle 35.2 mpg Extra Urban Cycle 42.0 mpg Urban Cycle 27.3 mpg |
|
| Yes, why not a diesel. Good point. | |
|
Replying to: jcg1965 (Feb 03, 2007 8:36 pm) With over 100K miles, I've averaged over 27.5 mpg. I generally drive carefully and set the cruise at the speed limit (usually 65mph). I restrain from jack-rabbit starts while street driving, but I DO autocross the car competitively several times a year. I also am easy on the brakes as I coast down a lot before braking- front brakes last me 60K miles or more. I don't race people just to get to a red light first. If you're wearing out your brakes faster, that means you're accelerating and using more fuel than you have to. Relaxed driving WILL save you 15% or more on your fuel mileage. |
|
|
Replying to: jbw929 (Mar 11, 2006 11:28 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: windaddy (May 23, 2007 8:39 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: jwelsh (May 26, 2007 12:02 pm) I agree with the poor turning radius, but I have no problem with visibility (blind spots?) and I'm not unhappy with the mileage. Of course, this is coming from someone who drove gas-guzzling full-sized pickup trucks for years, so this peppy little car is nothing but fun, fun, fun! I'm very sad to say that I'm trading it in, though. Not because I don't love it, but because it's just not suited to the steep, unpaved roads and deep snow of my Adirondack mountain home. I will miss this car.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Wagons Chrysler PT Cruiser Chrysler PT Cruiser Owners: MPG-Real World Numbers
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
