Sign In Join 



Chrysler PT Cruiser Owners: MPG-Real World Numbers

138 messages,  Last post on Apr 06, 2009 at 6:09 AM

You are in the Chrysler PT Cruiser Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Chrysler PT Cruiser, Fuel Efficiency (MPG)


Messages Page 5 of 14
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
14
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#41 of 138
Re: Terrible over time [micweb] by hhrguy
Jul 21, 2006 (6:30 pm)
Reply

Replying to: micweb (Apr 20, 2006 2:10 pm)

I sold my PT cruiser for 3 main reasons. 1) pooor hiway gas mileage 2) small fuel tank (more fill ups on long road trips) 3) Poor turning radius.
I purchased a new '06 hhr, and it has the 2.4 engine. much more power than the pt, 16gal gas tank, and the best of all was the promise of 30mpg hiway. Our first trip was 2 days after purchase, and it got 27.5 mpg hiway. I thought it might get better when broken in. Boy, was I right! now at 2800mi, we consistently get 34-36 mpg hiway. yea, iI gave up some other comforts,to buy the HHR, (2 extra cup holders, and 1 power outlet), but i don't miss those much. The HHR is a car that will turn on a dime, and give charng, the pick up is as good as the PT, and the HHR is very quite on the road. I relly like not cranking up the cd to drownd out the noise. I have owned both, and my vote goes to the HHR!
#42 of 138
Re: Terrible over time [hhrguy] by neile457
Sep 11, 2006 (3:16 am)
Reply

Replying to: hhrguy (Jul 21, 2006 6:30 pm)

We got our 02 Limited about a year ago. We just got our best tank - 24 mpg - YaaHoo! I knew the gas mileage would suck, but I didn't think about the range, that's what really sucks. But I love my PT!
#43 of 138
Re: Terrible over time [neile457] by triplesevn
Dec 29, 2006 (3:44 pm)
Reply

Replying to: neile457 (Sep 11, 2006 3:16 am)

I'm actually quite upset about the MPG I'm getting.
I just bought a 2006 base model in November.
 
I purchased the car not only for it's looks, but it's supposidly good MPG. The sticker says 20/26 City/Highway.
 
I've been testing it since the day I bought it and I can only get 20mpg from it. I drive 70 miles a day for work. Nearly all Highway but a few miles. I've driven an entire tank at 65mph as well as 70mph, 75mph, and 80mph to see what I can get. 80mph get's me 19mpg while 65/70mpg get's me 20mpg.
 
I had Chrysler perform a test because I felt the car was not getting the advertised mpg for highway miles. They tested the car at 20.86mpg at 70mph.
 
I do love the car, but I'm very unhappy with the mpg. Are there any American model cars that get mpg as the Japanese and Korean's do? I don't want to buy one, but curious to know what cars our country produces in this catagory that complete with the foreign cars.
#44 of 138
Re: Terrible over time [triplesevn] by jpf
Jan 05, 2007 (10:12 pm)
Reply

Replying to: triplesevn (Dec 29, 2006 3:44 pm)

I have a 2006 Caravan with the same 4 cylinder engine. I have gotten as high as 28 to 30 MPG on the highway if I drive at a constant speed (60 MPH). On a recent 2,500 mile trip I averaged 25 MPG. Maybe the computer is programmed differently between the 4 cylinder Caravan and the Cruiser. Anyhow, it's odd that the Cruiser doesn't get better mileage.
#45 of 138
Re: Terrible over time [jpf] by micweb
Jan 06, 2007 (7:31 am)
Reply

Replying to: jpf (Jan 05, 2007 10:12 pm)

Same situation here. 2004 and 2006 PT's, 23 mpg on freeway trips; 2006 Caravan SE, 25 mpg on freeway trips with same engine. (The 2006 2.4 in the SE actually satisfied passenger car emissions requirements, too.)
 
Then again look at the mpg figures for the new Sebring with the new 2.4 "world engine" vs. that same engine in the smaller, lighter Caliber...
#46 of 138
Re: Gas Mileage/Trip Computer [jbw929] by jcg1965
Feb 03, 2007 (8:24 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jbw929 (Mar 11, 2006 11:28 am)

Hello...
 
You are getting better mileage than I am believe it or not - I have a 2006 red Touring. I have been tracking the last 10 tanks of gas and averaging 15-17 (sometimes 18) MGP. I manually caluclate the mileage according to miles per trip/gallons in...I'm not a speed demon and go about (sometimes more highway) 50%/50% city/highway. Once I got 22 MPG but that was on a 75 mile trip on nearly all freeway at 65mph.
 
The service department says this "You aren't driving it right, only under certain circumstances do you get said gas mileage, the emissions are different than other cars, the engine is new, some people are getting that much..."
 
Survey person called, I said I was unhappy, am planning on selling it and I then got a call from Chrysler...They are going to 'look' at my car. He asked if I would buy another Chrysler and I said "No way, I won't buy another American made car at all."
 
I too would NOT have bought this car if I knew the gas mileage was this bad. It is too bad, the car is sweeet otherwise. The thechnology is there, it is a flipping 4 cyl car. There is no excuse for poor mpg other than a lousy engine. None.
 
Thanks for reading this!
 
Jo.
#47 of 138
Re: Terrible over time [triplesevn] by jcg1965
Feb 03, 2007 (8:36 pm)
Reply

Replying to: triplesevn (Dec 29, 2006 3:44 pm)

Hello...
 
You are getting better mileage than I am believe it or not - I have a 2006 red Touring. I have been tracking the last 10 tanks of gas and averaging 15-17 (sometimes 18) MGP...This is crap. I manually caluclate the mileage according to miles per trip/gallons in...I'm not a speed demon and go about (sometimes more highway) 50%/50% city/highway. Once I got 22 MPG but that way a 75 mile trip on nearly all freeway at 65mph.
 
The serice department says this "You aren't driving it right, only under certain circumstances do you get said gas mileage, the emissions are different than other cars, the engine is new, some people are getting that much..."
 
Survey person called, I said I was unhappy, am planning on selling it and I then got a call from Chrysler...They are going to 'look' at my car. He asked if I would buy another Chrysler and I said "No way, I won't buy another American made car at all."
 
I too would NOT have bought this car if I knew the gas mileage was this bad. It is too bad, the car is sweeet otherwise. The thechnology is there, it is a flipping 4 cyl car. There is no excuse for poor mpg other than a lousy engine. None.
 
Thanks for reading this!
 
Jo.
#48 of 138
Re: Terrible over time by myrtlebeachpt
Feb 11, 2007 (1:12 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jcg1965 (Feb 03, 2007 8:36 pm)

well i have the opposite experence to share than many of you, while it could use a larger tank, about a month ago we bought my wife a 06 touring with the 2.4L and auto tranny it had 10.7k miles on it. she drives a round trip of 80mi four days a week just to get to school and back, of that it is roughly 50% 4-lane hwy with speeds of 65-70mph, and maybe 3 stop lights each way, the other 50% is 2-lane twisty rural rd avg speed on this is 50-60mph she has to slow down (to turn) or stop 6 times each way (not incl) red lights, and also does a lot (prob close to 150mi a week) of local (we are rural so for us local is less than 15 mi one way) driving also. She has gotten better than 24mpg on every tank she had put in it (87 octane) granted this is during the winter so we dont run the ac much, i expect that to affect the mpg during the summer. we went on a short trip a week ago, about 120 mi round trips, 70% on 4-lane hwy aproxx 70mph and i reset the current mpg in the DIC and was amazed to see hwy mpg consistintly at 27.9 mpg. she nor i are easy on a vehicle so i was not expecting this kind of mpg, figured it would be closer to 20. anyway i guess you can chalk me up as plesently suprised at our first "CAR"
#49 of 138
Switched To A Vibe by hojo
Feb 27, 2007 (6:21 pm)
Reply
I finally got tired of the poor gas mileage, blind spot, and large turning radius. I miss some things about the PT (solid ride, compass, electronics...), but I like getting 30-38 mpg, no blind spot, and being able to make a U-turn on ordinary roads. The Pontiac Vibe (really a Toyota Matrix/Corolla with Pontiac emblem on it) is similar in size and utility to the PT, but almost doubles the gas mileage I used to get with my PT. Now why couldn't Chrysler do better with the mpg? Too bad.
 
HoJo
#50 of 138
15-16mpg-I should have read this forum before buying! by pttopless
Mar 07, 2007 (10:01 am)
Reply

Replying to: hojo (Feb 27, 2007 6:21 pm)

I bought an '06 PT Turbo convertable right off the lot.
The odometer was at 00000003!!
It's fun to drive, but it's getting the worst milage imaginable! It comes with an onboard mpg calculator, so I always know how poorly it performs. Assuming that it's accurate, I'm getting between 15 and 16 mpg. That's combined highway and city. I've never done a full tank on the highway, though I would assume it would get better numbers. I only have 4500 miles on it now. At $3 a gallon, I can only go 215 miles on a tank. Anyone want to buy a great low milage car? :-{

Messages Page 5 of 14
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
14
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement