You are here:
Forums
Coupes & Convertibles
Dodge Challenger
2008 Dodge Challenger

522 messages, Last post on Apr 28, 2009 at 10:23 PM
You are in the Dodge Challenger Forum. Your Host is claires
|
|
|---|---|
|
One word sums this concept up... UGLY! What is the point of this thing?? Even Dodge admitted the Challenger DIDN'T sell all that well back in the 70's, so what really is the point? This is obviously an attempt to pull in the geezer's that had an "original" hemi way back when. Come on DCX your making great looking cars (Magnum, 300C) that people want, don't fall for the retro geezer nonsense! Do you really think young guys are gonna do anything but laugh at this joke of a car? Pull the plug now! |
|
|
Replying to: dialm4speed (Feb 10, 2006 5:47 am) if you don't think the magnum and 300c have a bit of retro in them, you have an odd way of analyzing style.
|
|
|
Replying to: qbrozen (Feb 10, 2006 6:55 am) The Magnum is supposed to be retro what ? Dodge Monaco wagon ?? Because it sure has nothing to do with the Dodge Magnum of the late 70's or early '80's. It's just a station wagon w/ a Hemi available under the hood.
|
|
|
Replying to: brysok6 (Feb 10, 2006 7:40 am) |
|
|
Replying to: dialm4speed (Feb 10, 2006 5:47 am) |
|
|
Replying to: brysok6 (Feb 10, 2006 7:40 am) I don't recall the Magnum being called "retro" I was under the impression that "retro" title went to the Charger and of course now the Challenger (which if it's priced over 35,000 grand will only sell in very limited numbers and wil not last). It's just a station wagon w/ a Hemi available under the hood. And just what's wrong with that? |
|
|
Replying to: chuck1959 (Feb 10, 2006 11:39 am)
|
|
|
|
|
I have a real love/hate relationship with new American cars. Probably has something to do with my loathing toward the current administration in D.C. Because we seem to be reverting back to the '50s in this country. Yes, these retro-cars are more like the 70s, and I actually like them. But as one of the early responders here pointed out, these cars are big and noisy and heavy and gas-guzzling, so while nearly all of our foreign-policy decisions seem to revolve around oil (Iraq, Venezuela, Iran), we continue to build these large and arrogant and oh-so-very-American rides that have a big f-U attitude to them. That said, I do think many of them are cool. I like the Challenger, although I think it's too much like the Lambo Miura concept and the new Mustang in that it's nearly identical (looking) to the original, rather than a modern take. Yes, the engines are doubtlessly more efficient and the handling's much better, but it would be nice if they weren't simply so retro and a little more original. They're a bit too SAFE in their styling. Same with the Mini and the new Beetle, all of which I like very much, but they're pretty conservative. No risks, like Hollywood, which continues to simply do remakes of old TV shows (Dukes of Hazzard, Miami Vice, and they're even contemplating Mr. Ed). Of course they're all better than the Malibu, which is a disgrace to its name. And to completely defeat my entire argument, I LOVE the Magnum. Big and obnoxious the way it should be, although it's a V8 that at least TRIES to be responsible by cutting back to 4 cylinders when it needs to. Also, the Magnum is a station wagon, which in my book is 1,000 times better than an SUV. It's qualified as a passenger car, so it needs to meet fuel and safety standards that "light-truck" SUVs can ignore. Also, it's lower so it's easier to see around and more maneuverable. Brand-new but with cool styling and MAD performance.
|
|
|
Replying to: funkymunky (Feb 10, 2006 12:50 pm) Two more names you left out of your flop list are the Impala and the Monte Carlo. **What's wrong with Miami Vice**
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Coupes & Convertibles
Dodge Challenger
2008 Dodge Challenger
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Dodge Challenger



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats