Sign In Join 



Nissan Altima Real World MPG

196 messages,  Last post on Nov 29, 2009 at 7:50 PM

You are in the Nissan Altima Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Nissan Altima, Fuel Efficiency (MPG), Sedan


Messages Page 10 of 21
1
...
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
...
21
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#85 of 196
Re: 2008 Altima 3.5 SE [omelet1978] by ruking1
Dec 28, 2007 (11:19 am)
Reply

Replying to: omelet1978 (Dec 23, 2007 11:24 am)

" drive ALOT, and I average about 1800 miles a month. I read up on premium vs regular and even found out the dealer puts 87 in, so I've just been using that and it has been running fine and has lots of power. I have filled it up and calculated the miles vs the fuel I put in the tank and came out with the following mpg: 18.8, 20.1, 19.5, 19.5, and 19.4.
  
I've read on here that the mileage will go up 2-3 thousand miles and that the computer adjusts to your driving habits. Is this true? I was hoping for an average of 22mpg per the new fuel economy standards. My previous vehicle was a Toyota 4Runner and the new fuel standards said it averaged 15mpg which was dead on.
  
Oh, and just out of curiosity, if I were to put in premium, would I make up the extra cost with better fuel economy? "
 
I take it PUG is the recommended grade. Your computer can and will adjust timing for the lower octane (87) . You do lose app 10% in performance, which on the face of it is really not a big deal. So what remains is really a cost benefit calculation/problem.
 
Do you pay less for regular and get slightly worse mileage or pay more for premium and get better mileage? TEST IT!
 
So for example using YOUR RUG mpg; your average is 19.46 mpg/rug price per gal= $? per mile driven. Just do 5 tankfuls of PUG and see what the mpg is and what the per mile driven is. Compare obviously. Then you can make a decision based on (objective, hopefully) comparative data.
 
Personally I would ask why would you buy a car that requires/recommended premium, when buying a vehicle that requires/recommended RUG would have done just fine? In all likely hood you would have paid FAR less. RUG costs less, and you could have used those saved monies for more RUG!?
#86 of 196
Re: 2008 Altima 3.5 SE [ruking1] by omelet1978
Dec 28, 2007 (4:59 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ruking1 (Dec 28, 2007 11:19 am)

ruking1...
 
Well I bought the 3.5 b/c I like having a powerful engine. Money is not tight for me, but I do have a house payment, a new car payment, insurance now on two vehicles, etc...so I feel like I'm throwing money away using premium. It's not that much, but I just don't think it is necessary. My previous vehicle, a V8 2004 4Runner, suggested premium as well, but when gas prices went up I put regular in and it worked fine as well.
 
The 3.5 is rated at 270hp, and 258 torque. 90% of that is 243hp & 232 torque which is still plenty of power. Thats a 68hp and a 52 torque difference, so it is still significant. Despite being a 4500 lb vehicle my 4runner was pretty fast, and using 87 the Altima is significantly faster.
 
Also, it's a Nissan Altima, not a BMW 3 Series. If I bought one of those I would use premium! I'm not insulting the Altima here by any means. I think it's a great car! Oh, and btw, filled up today and it averaged out to 19.9 mpg, so it seem like the car is slowly starting to get better mileage.
#87 of 196
4 cylinder by omelet1978
Dec 29, 2007 (8:08 am)
Reply
Oh, I was comparing the 3.5 to the 4 cylinder when I said 68hp and 52 torque difference.
#88 of 196
Re: 4 cylinder [omelet1978] by generee
Dec 29, 2007 (3:39 pm)
Reply

Replying to: omelet1978 (Dec 29, 2007 8:08 am)

hey omelet, just curious if your mileage got better with time? i'm still running about 15 mpg. If i'm not mistaken, the altima has a 20 gallon tank, which should last at least 340 miles if the mpg were around 17 and up. i have 700 miles to go to hit 2000 miles so hopefully this gets better as xmas shopping has me mad broke
#89 of 196
. by omelet1978
Dec 29, 2007 (5:51 pm)
Reply
Yeah, it seem to be improving. My last fill-up was 19.9mpg, so hopefully it keeps going up. I'm expecting just over 21mpg when it is all said and done since i'm using regular. Typically, when I fill up it's anywhere from 15-17 gallons btw. Oh, and 15mpg is pretty low, I would take it to the dealership and have them look at it.
#90 of 196
Re: . [omelet1978] by maverick1966
Dec 29, 2007 (8:49 pm)
Reply

Replying to: omelet1978 (Dec 29, 2007 5:51 pm)

Hey, I have the 2008 Altima 3.5 and I have been getting 23 - 24 in town and that is Atlanta traffic. In the summer with the air on it was 22 -23 mpg. I go back and forth with the RUL and PUL. My foot is not too light but not that heavy in traffic. Someone at the Nissan dealership said that it might need some tweaking on the EFI. I hope that it gets better for you. Gotta agree - I love the power that it has! When you turn the heat on, try pushing Auto and then push the A/C button to turn it off and see if it gets better. Hope this helps!
#91 of 196
Re: 2008 Altima 3.5 SE [ruking1] by omelet1978
Jan 01, 2008 (1:16 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ruking1 (Dec 28, 2007 11:19 am)

rukin1....one quick question for you. You said a 10% decrease in performance using regular. Using regular do you get a 10% decrease in fuel economy as well? If so that would put it right around the new fuel economy standards saying that the 3.5 SE averages around 22mpg using premium.
 
thanks
#92 of 196
Re: 2008 Altima 3.5 SE [omelet1978] by ruking1
Jan 01, 2008 (5:49 pm)
Reply

Replying to: omelet1978 (Jan 01, 2008 1:16 pm)

In the case, where I did the side by side comparison, no. But I could almost immediately feel the performance difference, so I did not drive it normally.
#93 of 196
Gas mileage drop after putting on snow tires by 97alty
Jan 03, 2008 (9:58 pm)
Reply
Hi all, I recently put on snow tires and my MPG went down from 32 to 26. What would that mean?
 
My MPG is
 



Track Your MPG
#94 of 196
Re: Gas mileage drop after putting on snow tires [97alty] by ruking1
Jan 04, 2008 (8:14 am)
Reply

Replying to: 97alty (Jan 03, 2008 9:58 pm)

To me it means that snow tires and winter operations are 18.75% less efficient.

Messages Page 10 of 21
1
...
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
...
21
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement