Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
SUVs Honda Pilot Honda Pilot 2006
1334 messages, Last post on Jan 07, 2008 at 7:34 PM
You are in the Honda Pilot Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
|
Replying to: fapel (Dec 30, 2005 10:43 am) I do think there are two sides to these issues. A small percentage of even the most reliable cars are going to have major problems, and Honda is meeting it's obligations under the warranty. I don't think Honda is behaving any differently than any other mfg - I have not heard of a car company simply replacing a vehicle in this situation. I also think there is a good chance the car will be "good as new" if the work is performed competently. While there might be a slight resale hit if the car was sold in the near term, it won't be much of a factor once the car has 50K miles of good service - I certainly wouldn't hesitate to buy a new car that had it's engine replaced early in it's life if it has a good service record following the repair. It does sound like Honda is willing to go with a free extended warranty. If you have a warranty to 120K miles on the new engine, that seems like a fairly good assurance that any problems with the engine will be Honda's problems, not yours, for as long as you own the car. I know it is attractive to think the a car company should just step in and provide a new car whenever an owner has a major problem with a recently purchased vehicle. But if all the car mfgs did this, they'd have to raise the price of cars accordingly and we'd all pay, one way or the other. It's a zero-sum game. Like I said, two sides to this issue. Good luck getting satisfactory resolution regardless. - Mark |
|
|
Replying to: brihaga (Dec 30, 2005 11:14 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: eduardo613 (Dec 28, 2005 7:34 pm) Just bug them more. A month is way too long. Good luck tom
|
|
|
Replying to: eduardo613 (Dec 28, 2005 7:34 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: steroid (Dec 30, 2005 3:20 pm) |
|
| OK, after almost purchasing a LT Tahoe a few years ago, I'm back doing research for a vehicle that can carry 8 passengers but is not a minivan. So far our Outback has done a great job but with a new child, it is getting a little small. I like getting decent gas mileage and will never tow anything. Therefore, I have narrowed it down to the 2006 Honda Pilot and now the 2007 Tahoe with it's "cylinder deactivation thang". Any comments? | |
|
|
|
Replying to: tsy (Dec 30, 2005 4:08 pm)  That was the excuse from the dealer.. Thank you Tom! BTW my Pilot is Steel Blue
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: okra (Dec 30, 2005 5:15 pm) I had the Rear Camera on my 2003 Pilot Navi (it was an additional option then) but no back up sensors. I do drive often in reverse  and there were several close calls where the camera did not help. The camera has certain spots that it just can't see. I knew then that my new Pilot would need BU Sensors. The 2006 Navi has the rear view camera included but I do need the sensors. Now you know! |
|
|
Replying to: eduardo613 (Jan 02, 2006 7:09 pm) I agree with the backup camera and the backup sensors. Each has their advantages (and disadvantages). The Lexus LS 430 I bought my father has both camera and sensors- which makes parking a breeze! Hope this helps! tom |
|
|
Replying to: mjansen1 (Jan 01, 2006 7:35 pm) I went through the same thing. I had a Suburban because I needed to carry 8 comfortably which I didn't feel was possible in the old Tahoe. The 'burban was too big, so I bought a Sequoia. The Sequioa was still big and thirsty, so I bought a Nissan Minivan, which was still big (bigger than a Tahoe, actually) and got terrible mileage also. I ended up buying the Pilot because it will seat 8 comfortably, as long as 3 of them are smaller adults or children. I have not seen the new Tahoe, but I'm sure the 3rd row is bigger than the outgoing model. My wife is very happy driving the Pilot. In terms of mileage, the Pilot is decent- not great. You'll do better with a Toyota minivan. If you only want a 2wd Pilot, it too has the cylinder deactivation, but this will only help with highway driving, not city (EPA 18/24). I would expect the mileage on the AWD Pilot (EPA 17/22) to still be better than the 4wd Tahoe (EPA 15/21) with cylinder deactivation. Of course, this depends totally upon how you drive. One final thought, the first year production of GM trucks tends to be much less reliable than the outgoing model. It takes a year or two for build quality to improve. Just something to think about. I hope this helps. Good luck. tom |
|
You are here:
Forums
SUVs Honda Pilot Honda Pilot 2006
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Honda Pilot
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
