You are here: Forums Coupes & Convertibles Porsche Cayman S Porsche Cayman S

Porsche Cayman S

295 messages,  Last post on Aug 04, 2009 at 7:01 AM

You are in the Porsche Cayman S Forum. Your Host is claires

What is this discussion about? Porsche Cayman S, Coupe, Convertible

Messages Page 26 of 30 1 ... 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

#245 of 295 Re: I would think... [topspin628] by habitat1 Apr 20, 2007 (4:32 am)
Replying to: topspin628 (Apr 19, 2007 7:53 am) "Did anyone cross shop the Cayman with the Vette?"   I have a 911, not a Cayman, but was asked that question by a friend who is considering a Porsche now. My response is that the two couldn't be further apart on the subjective qualities. Porsche is all about precision, finesse and quality, the Corvette is all about brute power and quantity. In actual statistical performance, a 911S and Corvette (or Viper, for that matter) are not all that far apart. But how you feel in the drivers seat is night and day. Both when the car is moving and when it isn't.
#246 of 295 Re: I would think... [topspin628] by bgsntth Apr 20, 2007 (7:47 am)
Replying to: topspin628 (Apr 19, 2007 7:53 am) The Cayman works very well as a daily driver, if you are an enthusiast who accepts it is a true sports car. The suspension is stiff, but compliant. The engine makes a lot of noise, but it is glorious. It also is very comfortable, and has a lot of space for gym bags and such.   I chose it over a Boxster because I never really fit in the Boxster; albeit I have not sat in one in the last 3 years, I had a convertible previously and actually prefer a hardtop, and I will at some point start participating in trackdays.
#247 of 295 Any basis of comparison? by rmdds May 06, 2007 (6:39 pm)
Anyone out there who has driven both - the Cayman S and BMW's new 335i? Any perspectives or thoughts on the relative performance. I have yet to test drive the latter.   I know both are entirely different cars. But, I have been hearing big raves about the 335i's twin turbo, never mind the new M3 which will be out next year.Just wanted to hear out some comments. Tks Replies to this message: fedlawman (May 07, 2007 2:32 pm) seamus6 (Aug 14, 2007 8:19 pm)
#248 of 295 Re: Any basis of comparison? [rmdds] by fedlawman May 07, 2007 (2:32 pm)
Replying to: rmdds (May 06, 2007 6:39 pm) That's easy - the Cayman is sportier and the 335 is roomier.
#249 of 295 Cayman S features by vodka Aug 14, 2007 (6:30 pm)
In every family there’s one person who thinks a little differently than everyone else. Someone who is very much in touch with his roots, but interprets them in a totally different way.   Check the powerful expression of the energy:   Performance, acceleration, speed. Terms subconsciously associated with the rear view(if you can only see the rear) of the new Cayman S. Central to the look: the dual tailpipe. Framed by two ribs that allow a glimpse of the twin-branch performance exhaust system. An effective synthesis of forms and function. In true Porsche fashion, the open design not only offers outstanding looks, but also provides additional cooling.
#250 of 295 Re: Any basis of comparison? [rmdds] by seamus6 Aug 14, 2007 (8:19 pm)
Replying to: rmdds (May 06, 2007 6:39 pm) I've driven both and now own an '07 Cayman S. They are two completely different cars. The 335i is an excellent sports coupe (I traded a Z4 for the Cayman) that offers typical BMW performance, handling, quality and comfort. For my money the 335i is a better choice than the new M3. But the Cayman S is a superior sports car, not a GT, not just another sports coupe. If Porsche would endow it with 50 more hp, it would outperform the Carrera and the Carrera S. As it is, it is a wonderful driving experience and stops, goes and corners better than anything one could buy for $25k more than its lofty price. And it works as a daily driver with excellent storage space for a true sports car. The gas mileage, while not in the econo car class is acceptable for a car with its performance. Its quality is first class, too, as it should be for the price. Check out the J. D. Power ratings. Porsche and the Cayman in particular, is tops. One personal quality is that is does not come with runflat tires as do all BMWs. In my opinion, they are awful tires and awfully expensive to boot. RFs cannot be repaired under any circumstances and the cost well over $200 each to replace even when you run over something as simple as a small nail that barely punctures the tire. In the final analysis, it's what you want.. do you need four seats? If so, get the BMW. If not, drive a Cayman, preferably an S with a 6 speed, and you'l be smitten. It is simply a superior automobile.
#251 of 295 Suspension Problem? by shanemstr Aug 15, 2007 (6:22 pm)
I have a 2006 Cayman S. I lowered my car 8 months ago with H&R springs. About two weeks ago, I heard a dragging noise from the rear of the car. I took the car to the dealership for inspection, they information the stroud had slip and ripped the cv boot. They didn't want to cover the repairs under my warranty because I lowered my car with after market accesories. A friend told that a lot of owers had the same problem without lowering the car. Has anybody had the same problem, or similar. I'm trying to get more information.   Any feed back is appreciated.   Thank you!!
#252 of 295 Caymen S Vs. SLK 55 AMG by unikly Aug 25, 2007 (10:26 pm)
Im new to this forum. Planning to buy me a new car since I just relocated to the US. I got a limited budget but fancy me a small car rather than a huge truck. Options are Caymen S or SLK 55 AMG. Both have the same price range. Am using the car for a short drive to work. Anyone care to expose the comparisons between these 2 cars, lets hear it. Cheers. Replies to this message: habitat1 (Aug 27, 2007 3:21 am)
#253 of 295 Re: Caymen S Vs. SLK 55 AMG [unikly] by habitat1 Aug 27, 2007 (3:21 am)
Replying to: unikly (Aug 25, 2007 10:26 pm) You seriously need to test drive these two cars. They have almost nothing in common from a driving perspective, IMO.   The SLK55 isn't really a sports car, IMO. It's a nearly 3,500lb SL-lite, with lots of torque attached to a lousy slushbox automatic. If you like to drag race between stoplights, it's the bomb. But for any other kind of driving, I'd take another of my former $32k Honda S2000 over it any day.   The Cayman S is a serious sports car. According to my Acura/Mercedes dealer, who owns one, it is the 911 of old. I happen to like my 997 version, but I know what he means. He may sell SLK55's and SL65's, but he drives a Speed Yellow Cayman S. Six speed manual, of course.   You aren't going to get much help in this forum. I think the answer resides with you. Do you want a real sports car, or something else? And I hope that you are going to use whatever you get for more than just a short drive to work. Otherwise, you might as well get a Prius.
#254 of 295 Don't be fooled by price by kmans Aug 27, 2007 (3:46 am)
As habitat1 said, these cars have almost nothing in common. The Mercedes is a luxury barge (albeit a smaller one) trying to be disquised as a performance car. The Cayman is a true sports car down to its last bolt. They serve different purposes and usually appeal to different drivers / styles. You owe it to yourself to do your research and this site along with Cayman Club both have a ton of information on the Cayman.   Then get out there and test drive each of them and report back and let us know what you think!

Messages Page 26 of 30 1 ... 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

You are here: Forums Coupes & Convertibles Porsche Cayman S Porsche Cayman S