- #241 of 295
-
Re: PASM and 19" tires [chander]
by habitat1
-
Apr 17, 2007 (7:51 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: chander (Apr 17, 2007 4:02 pm)
I assume you are aware that PASM has two settings you can toggle between via a push button. I have a 911S in which PASM and 19" wheels are standard. The "normal" setting is at least, if not more, comfortable than the standard suspension on a base 911 w/ 18" wheels. Yet, even on the normal setting, body roll is very minimal and the car handles very well. The "sport" setting is noticably stiffer and great for "enthusiastic" driving on smooth surfaces, but too harsh for daily driving on city streets, IMO. After 18 months and nearly 13k miles, I am a fan of PASM. But I must admit that I probably only use the "sport" PASM setting 10% of the time. On the other hand, I use the "sport" setting on my sport/chrono (faster throttle response and braking) closer to 50% of the time. The two can be toggled independently.
I have had no negative issues with the lower ground clearance of PASM, although I have yet to hit a major pothole and do my best to avoid them. I think the difference in ground clearance is minimal and if you hit a big enough pothole, it would do damage wither way.
|
- #242 of 295
-
I would think...
by kyfdx HOST
-
Apr 18, 2007 (6:26 am)
-
|
.. that the bigger risk to 19" wheels is tire/rim damage from having 1/2" less sidewall..
I've not heard too many stories of body damage from potholes... on any car. I doubt 19" vs. 18" would have much effect there... the axles are still the same distance from the ground.
|
- #243 of 295
-
Re: I would think... [kyfdx]
by bgsntth
-
Apr 18, 2007 (7:14 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: kyfdx (Apr 18, 2007 6:26 am)
This is the reason I have 17" rims on my Cayman, as I drive through SF everyday and take advantage of the pot-hole ridden commute lane on Bay Street to cut time. The Cayman base suspension is very compliant and rarely bottoms-out, much less so even than my previous OBXT, ironcially enough.
|
- #244 of 295
-
Re: I would think... [bgsntth]
by topspin628
-
Apr 19, 2007 (7:53 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: bgsntth (Apr 18, 2007 7:14 am)
SF traffic is probably similar to NYC so I have to ask how you like it and if you use as a daily driver? I am very drawn to this car for the looks and performance but I'm concerned a bit on the noise factor and the comfort as a daily driver. Also, just curious why you chose over a boxster? I like the looks of the Cayman much more but how much fun are you giving up without the vert option?
Did anyone cross shop the Cayman with the Vette?
Thanks to all for input/opinions.
|
- #245 of 295
-
Re: I would think... [topspin628]
by habitat1
-
Apr 20, 2007 (4:32 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: topspin628 (Apr 19, 2007 7:53 am)
"Did anyone cross shop the Cayman with the Vette?"
I have a 911, not a Cayman, but was asked that question by a friend who is considering a Porsche now. My response is that the two couldn't be further apart on the subjective qualities. Porsche is all about precision, finesse and quality, the Corvette is all about brute power and quantity. In actual statistical performance, a 911S and Corvette (or Viper, for that matter) are not all that far apart. But how you feel in the drivers seat is night and day. Both when the car is moving and when it isn't.
|
- #246 of 295
-
Re: I would think... [topspin628]
by bgsntth
-
Apr 20, 2007 (7:47 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: topspin628 (Apr 19, 2007 7:53 am)
The Cayman works very well as a daily driver, if you are an enthusiast who accepts it is a true sports car. The suspension is stiff, but compliant. The engine makes a lot of noise, but it is glorious. It also is very comfortable, and has a lot of space for gym bags and such.
I chose it over a Boxster because I never really fit in the Boxster; albeit I have not sat in one in the last 3 years, I had a convertible previously and actually prefer a hardtop, and I will at some point start participating in trackdays.
|
- #247 of 295
-
Any basis of comparison?
by rmdds
-
May 06, 2007 (6:39 pm)
-
|
Anyone out there who has driven both - the Cayman S and BMW's new 335i? Any perspectives or thoughts on the relative performance. I have yet to test drive the latter.
I know both are entirely different cars. But, I have been hearing big raves about the 335i's twin turbo, never mind the new M3 which will be out next year.Just wanted to hear out some comments. Tks 
|
- #248 of 295
-
Re: Any basis of comparison? [rmdds]
by fedlawman
-
May 07, 2007 (2:32 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: rmdds (May 06, 2007 6:39 pm)
That's easy - the Cayman is sportier and the 335 is roomier.
|
- #249 of 295
-
Cayman S features
by vodka
-
Aug 14, 2007 (6:30 pm)
-
|
In every family there’s one person who thinks a little differently than everyone else. Someone who is very much in touch with his roots, but interprets them in a totally different way.
Check the powerful expression of the energy:
Performance, acceleration, speed. Terms subconsciously associated with the rear view(if you can only see the rear) of the new Cayman S. Central to the look: the dual tailpipe. Framed by two ribs that allow a glimpse of the twin-branch performance exhaust system. An effective synthesis of forms and function. In true Porsche fashion, the open design not only offers outstanding looks, but also provides additional cooling.
|
- #250 of 295
-
Re: Any basis of comparison? [rmdds]
by seamus6
-
Aug 14, 2007 (8:19 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: rmdds (May 06, 2007 6:39 pm)
I've driven both and now own an '07 Cayman S. They are two completely different cars. The 335i is an excellent sports coupe (I traded a Z4 for the Cayman) that offers typical BMW performance, handling, quality and comfort. For my money the 335i is a better choice than the new M3. But the Cayman S is a superior sports car, not a GT, not just another sports coupe. If Porsche would endow it with 50 more hp, it would outperform the Carrera and the Carrera S. As it is, it is a wonderful driving experience and stops, goes and corners better than anything one could buy for $25k more than its lofty price. And it works as a daily driver with excellent storage space for a true sports car. The gas mileage, while not in the econo car class is acceptable for a car with its performance. Its quality is first class, too, as it should be for the price. Check out the J. D. Power ratings. Porsche and the Cayman in particular, is tops. One personal quality is that is does not come with runflat tires as do all BMWs. In my opinion, they are awful tires and awfully expensive to boot. RFs cannot be repaired under any circumstances and the cost well over $200 each to replace even when you run over something as simple as a small nail that barely punctures the tire. In the final analysis, it's what you want.. do you need four seats? If so, get the BMW. If not, drive a Cayman, preferably an S with a 6 speed, and you'l be smitten. It is simply a superior automobile. 
|
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Coupes & Convertibles 
