You are here:
Forums
SUVs
Chrysler Aspen
Chrysler Aspen

86 messages, Last post on Nov 30, 2009 at 3:31 PM
You are in the Chrysler Aspen Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
|
The brands will start to blend together, and their respective marketing images just get muddy and confused That's what happened to GM. GM has too many redundant divisions with no clear image with too many cars. |
|
|
|
|
I'm traveling that road too. Considering that the Jeep brand equity has been a major factor in keeping the Chrysler name afloat more than once, why risk sullying it further in any way? Moreover, what does Chrysler stand for, and shouldn't that be remarkably different from Dodge - synonomous with "truck" and "performance", IMO, and Jeep - synonomous with "SUV" and "off-road". Indeed, with so potent an example as GM, you'd think this lesson would have been learend before now. Even if the Durango is a great package, who needs yet another lux SUV in a pot filled with entries now losing luster? |
|
|
|
| Somebody remind me to use the speel chucker button next time I exceed three syllables... | |
| I say scrap the Chrysler luxury SUV, and give them another cross-over instead. The Pacifica isn't bringing in many buyers... | |
|
Well the wait is over: http://www.detnews.com/2005/autosinsider/0506/17/C01-218735.htm M |
|
|
|
|
I don't want to be mean or anything, but I hope it flops like a halibut in a dinghy. Aspen. Sheesh. On the bright side, it's not like they're dragging a once-great name through the mud of "repurposing" (see also "Charger"). ;-}
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: wale_bate1 (Jun 17, 2005 7:57 am) I was thinking Chrysler would use a name such as Conquest, Cordoba or Imperial but Aspen sounds great. I'm glad the vehicle has a real name, not something alpha numerical like FX45, QX56, X5, ML500, G500, H2, etc. |
|
|
|
|
You never drove an Aspen, did you? ;-] I think full-size, body on frame SUVs are damn stupid to begin with, and Chrysler getting into a rapidly fading picture even moreso, which is why my disdain. The future is (according to every industry analyst) that car-based crossovers are the next wave before we touch down aagin and actually admit we wanted wagons in the first place, but didn't want anyone to know we had spouses and kids! I think it's a bad business decision. As far as the name goes, my points are A) the Aspen name was nothing to be proud of whatsoever, and B) it's OK to stick it on some pudknocker SUV because it can't be sullied any further that it already is!
|
|
|
Replying to: wale_bate1 (Jun 18, 2005 6:33 pm) M
|
|
|
|
Can we rename this forum to Chysler Aspen since we know what this future vehicle will be called??
|
|
You are here:
Forums
SUVs
Chrysler Aspen
Chrysler Aspen
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2009 Chrysler Aspen



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats