Sign In Join 



Chevrolet Impala Real World MPG

117 messages,  Last post on Apr 15, 2009 at 11:28 AM

You are in the Chevrolet Impala Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Chevrolet Impala, Fuel Efficiency (MPG), Sedan


Messages Page 11 of 12
1
...
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#101 of 117
Re: 2008 LT 50th Edition [cnw] by ryster
Nov 07, 2008 (1:02 am)
Reply

Replying to: cnw (Aug 27, 2008 6:10 pm)

"I own a 2006 LT2, and considered trading for a 50th Edition--primarily for the Jewel Tint red and the sport suspension; I've already added the SS-style spoiler and the wheels/tires are an optional piece at any time."
 
Adding the '06+ SS style 18" wheels to a non-SS '06 or '07 Impala is not a simple bolt on. The front would be a direct swap, but the rear strut mount plates are different between the LS/LT/LTZ models from the '06 and '07 model years and the SS models. To do the swap on '06's and '07's, you would also need to get the SS rear strut pieces installed...otherwise the SS wheels will rub on the back.
 
In the '08 model year, LTZ, SS, and the 50th anniv. models have the sport suspension as standard which allows them to run the 18" wheels unobstructed.
 
Adding the '06/'07 17" alloys from an LTZ to an LS or LT model would be a simple swap. The SS wheels, not so much. I looked into it myself, and talked to thers who had done it, and determined it to be too expensive. The 18" wheels/tires themselves would be inexpensive enough on eBay, but getting the rear suspension swapped out was going to easily add another $300 in parts and labor to the project.
#102 of 117
Re: 2008 LT 50th Edition [ryster] by cnw
Nov 07, 2008 (3:30 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ryster (Nov 07, 2008 1:02 am)

Ryan, Thanks for the info. You answered several questions that I have had. I didn't realize that it was that involved; thought it was just a matter of changing wheels and tires. That also answers some of the questions I've had regarding what the difference in suspension is between models. I guess I'll just wait until I buy my next one and make sure I get the sport suspension. Thanks again, Clark
#103 of 117
Had a 2007, now a 2009 Impala LT by hawkman
Feb 11, 2009 (7:12 am)
Reply
I just traded my 2007 LT for a 2009 LT because of the traction and ABS. This may be too early to tell but my gas mileage seems have decreased from 24 with the 2007 to 20 (2009) in normal driving with the same engine size.
 
This could be due to 2 main factors 1) This is a new car with less than 1500 miles on it presently 2) I am driving in the winter vrs the summer. I'll be taking on a 1200 mile trip this weekend to check the highway mpg.
 
I would like to hear from drivers with the 2009 to compare and see what mpg they are getting. I miss my 24 (although it was in the summer).
 
I know cars get worse mileage in the winter for a variety of reasons, but does the car get better meileage as it gets older and more broken in?
#104 of 117
Re: Had a 2007, now a 2009 Impala LT [hawkman] by rvoth
Feb 12, 2009 (9:57 am)
Reply

Replying to: hawkman (Feb 11, 2009 7:12 am)

Just a friendly reminder that you shouldn't just lock the car on cruise and let it go.
 
The engine should have varying speeds, so the engine parts can heat up and break in under normal hwy speed and then cool at slower at slower hwy. This should be done with the time intervals 15 min normal and 15 min at slower speed. It will greatly help the fuel mileage and overall performance of the life of the engine.
 
  My father just purchased a SS impala , it went on a 3000 km trip and the fuel mileage was 24-27 mpg. They just went on a 500 km trip on flat land and the mileage went up to 32 mpg. This improvement is probable due to the previous trip through the mountain ,varying the speeds and allowing the V-8 engine to break in.
 
 Still the fuel mileage hasn't reach the rated 37 mpg but it only has 4000 km and is being driven in winter. Even with the fuel management system that works very well GM's mpg for the v-8 is hard to reach.
#105 of 117
mileage by saxe10595
Feb 28, 2009 (4:57 am)
Reply
2008 LT 50th edition. Now I have about 10k mileage. Computer shows average mileage to be 21.4. I get 26-27 on highway and 18-20 in the city. It has 18" wheels could this be cause of low mileage ? as GM claims anywhere upto 29 MPG.
#106 of 117
Re: mileage [saxe10595] by quietpro
Feb 28, 2009 (7:18 am)
Reply

Replying to: saxe10595 (Feb 28, 2009 4:57 am)

Lots of things can cause mileage to vary. The EPA estimates are achieved at 60 mph I believe. Try setting your cruise at reasonable speed, reset the mpg average, and see what you get. It won't take a long trip to get a close approximation of mileage. Try it in both directions to help rule out any slope in the trip or head wind.
I can average above the EPA estimate at 65 mph with my SS (5.3L V-8).
 
BTW, the wheel size shouldn't have a great effect in highway mileage. The biggest impact of wheel size would be in city mileage where the added weight would effect fuel consumption. The effect while cruising would be minimized.
#107 of 117
Re: 2006 Impala SS [pulgo] by hawkman
Mar 28, 2009 (2:28 pm)
Reply

Replying to: pulgo (Nov 28, 2007 8:12 am)

" Using the computer won't give meaningful numbers. "
 
I've found this to be true on a 2009 Impala LS. It says I got 25.3 mpg, but upon checking (miles vrs gas used) it comes out to 22.9. That too me is a huge difference. This is the second fill up in a row I have tested it and they both came back the same - way off.
#108 of 117
Re: 2006 Impala SS [hawkman] by quietpro
Mar 29, 2009 (7:08 am)
Reply

Replying to: hawkman (Mar 28, 2009 2:28 pm)

When comparing mileage (actual vs. computer), keep in mind that you are attempting to fill the tank to the EXACT same level for an accurate comparison. If you stop the pump at an even dollar (like most people), you may be topping off with varying amounts each time. If you stop when the pump cuts off, that will vary by the fuel nozzle and how far it is inserted into the filler tube. Even 1/4 gallon will skew the results a great deal. Add to that the calibration of the pump at the gas station you're using. While they are regulated, there are still many cases where pumps are intentionally set to deliver less fuel than is indicated. Even different pumps at the same gas station can skew your results.
 
I have tracked my mileage since I bought my car over three years ago. I am always within a 1 or 2 mpg from the indicated amount...but less than 1 mpg difference 95% of the time. The computer in my car is extremely accurate and given the variances that I am forced to deal with, it may be more accurate than I am capable of being.
#109 of 117
Re: 2006 Impala SS [hawkman] by ryster
Mar 29, 2009 (10:11 am)
Reply

Replying to: hawkman (Mar 28, 2009 2:28 pm)

The Driver Information Center ("DIC") in my '06 Impala 2LT is very accurate. Usually no more than 1mpg off from what I calculate manually. In fact, it is accurate enough that I can look at the calculated miles to empty before filling up and estimate how much gas the car will take (for example, if the DIC says the range is 66 miles, and the DIC shows economy of 22mpg, the car will take 14 gallons.) It is usually right on and fills to the point where gas almost overflows.
 
I have found when filling up that regardless of what gas station I use, the pump shuts off about 2 gallons early. Meaning, I can usually put 2 more gallons in after the pump first shuts off.
#110 of 117
'01 IMP LS 3.8 255,000 miles 22-24mpg by txguy
Apr 14, 2009 (10:41 am)
Reply
My 01 Imp LS mileage has dropped from the early 28-32 mpg to 22-24 mpg now at 255,000 miles. Otherwise the car looks and drives great. I have been completely satisfied with this car. The only non routine work on this car has been replacing cat twice, one wheel sensor, one coolant level sensor, the radiator and then the motor mounts at 225,000 miles. The fuel gauge hasn't worked since 110,000 miles, but I got used to tracking the miles on the trip odometer. I use Mobil 1 at 3,000-5,000 change intervals, do the transmission flushes and fuel system cleaners as recommended and that's about it. Oh and the last set of Michelins on this car went 114,000 miles. GM does build good cars!

Messages Page 11 of 12
1
...
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement