You are here:
Forums
Coupes & Convertibles
Mazda RX-8
Mazda RX-8 Gas Mileage Reports

91 messages, Last post on Feb 13, 2009 at 9:37 AM
You are in the Mazda RX-8 Forum. Your Host is claires
|
Replying to: trispec (Nov 19, 2005 5:31 am) I'm very happy with that. |
|
|
2004, MT with 14,200 M on the clock. Took weekend trip to Palm Springs from LA. One passenger, trunk full but back seats empty. Outbound: 168.2 miles at average speed of 29.5 MPH (2 hours plus in stop/go 1st gear traffic due to overturned truck on 10 FWY Return: 136.7 miles at average speed of 63.5 MPH (steady 75 -83 mph on 60 FWY |
|
| 20.12 MPG | |
|
I've been keeping track of gas mileage since day one, which is over 2 yrs ago. miles: 26275.7 gallons: 1398.596 miles/gallon: 18.79 price: $2847.39 price/gallon: $2.036 miles/dollar: 9.23 miles/day: 30.62 octane: mostly 89 The normal mpg range is 17-22. The 3 exceptions were when I took the car to Sebring Racetrack where it average 8-9 mpg. Fun, fun, fun! |
|
|
Replying to: dwynne (Nov 18, 2005 10:19 pm) Well, the next tank is back down to 14.5 mpg for the same commute, so getting over 16 mpg was just a temporary thing Dennis |
|
|
2004 RX-8 33500 miles bought new Nov 2005 for a real good price. Worst mileage 14.8 Georgia mountain autocross Best 22.8 hwy - 74 mph (wife driving) Daily driving 16-17 45 mile round trip commute. Drive easy 17.7 maybe, Drive hard 16.0 - I pick drive hard... BTW first set of tires lasted 30K now have Dunlops - much quieter, better ride, slightly better mileage. |
|
Would I be harming the RX8 engine if I used regular 87 octane gas? Also would that effect my gas mileage negatively?
|
|
|
Replying to: stbarton (May 01, 2006 9:24 am) |
|
|
|
I could never justify buying such a small car, that isn't as fast as the competition that gets such lousy gas mileage. The 350Z gets about 25 MPG. Even the Mustang GT gets better mileage and it is a V8! I owned a 1973 Mazda RX2. Fast little bugger, but it had oil burning problems. I wish they could work out the kinks in the Rotary engine. Seems like they haven't yet.
|
|
|
Replying to: carfanatic007 (May 10, 2006 10:31 pm) The following are the points to the rotary engine design: 1) Simple design engine design with few moving parts raises overall reliability over time. A design life of 200K miles on the old rotary designs, a sports car engine, was unheard of in the complicated multi-value piston world of the past. The Renesis Rotary's design life is 500K miles. Racing a rotary engines means one re-build per season, where as racing a piston engines means re-builds after every race. 2) Much lower torque at low RPMs is a wear and tear saver on the entire drivetrain. 3) The drag racing mentality of torque heavy engine design, based on a NASCAR formula in the USA is just dumb. Go watch any VOD Car video as torque heavy monster cars drag off screeching burn tires, only to crash half a block down the road as they simply loose control of the poorly torque balanced car. 4) Engine weight and size eliminate frontend steer compared to the high center of gravity weight of any piston designed engines. Acions might go to the flat four and flat six piston designs of Porche and Subaru. |
|
You are here:
Forums
Coupes & Convertibles
Mazda RX-8
Mazda RX-8 Gas Mileage Reports
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Mazda RX-8



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats