Sign In Join 



Acura TSX Real World MPG Numbers

221 messages,  Last post on Sep 21, 2009 at 2:10 PM

You are in the Acura TSX Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Acura TSX, Fuel Efficiency (MPG), Sedan


Messages Page 6 of 22
1
...
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
22
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#51 of 221
Premium Gas and mileage by gdswede
Aug 03, 2005 (4:57 am)
Reply
Just a little more input on the effect of premium gas vs regular gas on mileage. It definately makes a difference! I have tested this out repeatedly on several different types of cars - sedans, minivans, auto transmission, manual transmission, ... Premium gas consistently improves the gas mileage - generally somewhere between 5 and 10% (usually 2-3 MPG for most cars that get 20-35 MPG). Personally I think it makes sense to pay even 10% more for premium, even if you only get 5% better mileage (the cost difference is often less than 10%). Better performance, cleaner burning (both for engine and out the tailpipe), less emission into our precious environment, .... - and better mileage. By the way, the "medium" grade fuel is NOT worth it - that is the biggest ripoff of them all - modest or negligable improvement in effiecience for a significant cost increase.
#52 of 221
Re: Premium Gas and mileage [gdswede] by delmar1
Aug 03, 2005 (6:19 am)
Reply

Replying to: gdswede (Aug 03, 2005 4:57 am)

How is premium fuel cleaner burning within the engine and out the tailpipe?
#53 of 221
Re: Premium Gas and mileage [gdswede] by jg88
Aug 04, 2005 (10:26 am)
Reply
Have not experienced differences with using premium gas in a car rated for 87 octane. My expereince is that for engines requiring 87, use 87. 89-93 octane never appeared to me to improve performance, mileage or make the engine run any smoother or better.
 
However, for engines requiring premium, I have experienced differences in performance, mileage and engine smoothness when running 87 octane, none for the better either. My experience has been consistant in running the engine with the octane that the manufacturer recommends. If Acura lists premium, then I would suggest that the buyer uses it.
 
The anti-knock capability that manufacturers have included with their engines is just for that -- to reduce or eliminate pinging and knocking with sub-standard octane. It is not to mitigate performance reduction. (Wasn't the SAAB Lambda system the 1st car to have the capability to run regular instead of premium without knocking?) My take is that Acura is basically telling their customers that if you want to run lower octane, go ahead. It will not hurt the engine and it shouldn't make unnatural sounds in the engine compartment. However, for maximum performance and mileage, use the minimum recommended octane that they have designed their cars to run with. As manufacturers globalize their car platforms and engines, they need to be able to run the engines in locales that may have varying levels of gas based on the limitations of the local refineries. In Europe, it appeared to me in June, that most "petrol" stations had mostly premium and diesel. The car I rented required premium according to the sticker on the gas cap door.
#54 of 221
Regular vs. Premium Article by lainey
Aug 06, 2005 (3:51 pm)
Reply
Here is an interesting article on Regular vs. Premium gasoline.
 
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8844563/
#55 of 221
Regular v. Premium by jrynn
Aug 15, 2005 (6:26 pm)
Reply
Lainey -- Your link wasn't working when I tried it, but here's another from the Washington Post.
 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/05/AR2005080501595.html?sub=A- R
 
Here are a few very brief excerpts:
 
*****
 
Automotive experts say using regular gas in most vehicles does no damage and makes no discernible difference in performance. Cars made in the past 15 years have such highly refined computer controls that the engine will adjust to the grade of octane in the gasoline, even in cars sold as requiring premium gasoline. Some drivers -- in some cars under some driving conditions -- may notice a drop in horsepower, but for most people behind the wheel, it wouldn't be enough to notice, the experts say.
 
"It's not going to hurt anything," said Peter Gregori, service manager for EuroMotorcars, a Mercedes-Benz dealer in Bethesda. In fact, Gregori has been using regular gas in one of his own Mercedes cars for two years, and "it's perfect," he said -- even though Mercedes-Benz says owners should use only premium.
 
"I get better mileage with the regular than I do with the high-test, in this particular model that I have," Gregori said. Among cars that come in for service, Gregori said, he can't tell which have been sipping premium.
#56 of 221
Re: Regular v. Premium [jrynn] by lainey
Aug 15, 2005 (7:15 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jrynn (Aug 15, 2005 6:26 pm)

Thanks jrynn. I should have realized they would have archived the story. Actually, the story on MSNBC was from the Washington Post. Same story.
#57 of 221
Re: Regular v. Premium [jrynn] by frisconick
Aug 20, 2005 (10:55 am)
Reply

Replying to: jrynn (Aug 15, 2005 6:26 pm)

I get slightly better mileage with high-test than regular, but I drive a TL not a TSX, but I can't imagine they are that different. I tried this last week, so there was about 1/4 of a tank of high-test, so it was a mix.
#58 of 221
Re: Regular v. Premium [frisconick] by delmar1
Aug 21, 2005 (8:08 pm)
Reply

Replying to: frisconick (Aug 20, 2005 10:55 am)

Nick...you tested out regular? What was the resulting mpg compared to premium grade? Also...are you going to test out mid-grade?
 
I tested out regular in my wife's tsx. The car ran like a sick dog. This week...filled it back up with premium in hopes of exercising out those demon dogs. Next experiment....mid-grade.
#59 of 221
Re: Regular v. Premium [delmar1] by frisconick
Aug 22, 2005 (6:23 pm)
Reply

Replying to: delmar1 (Aug 21, 2005 8:08 pm)

Yeah, I wimped out, really didn't notice much of a difference, but I swear it took more RPMs when I gunned it for the 270 horses to kick in.
#60 of 221
Premium vs. mid grade in 6MT by stillooking
Aug 26, 2005 (3:29 pm)
Reply
I have noticed no difference in either performance or fuel economy. I get about 29+ mpg in my daily commute ( 40 mi, 80% state hwy). Tried regular once and noticed some slight hesitation when accelerating from stop.

Messages Page 6 of 22
1
...
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
22
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement