Sign In Join 



Hybrids & Diesels - Deals or Duds? - READ ONLY

5196 messages,  Last post on Oct 16, 2006 at 6:55 AM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Alternative Fuels, Biodiesel, Hybrid Cars


Messages Page 289 of 520
1
...
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
...
520
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#2877 of 5196
Re: Hybrids [john1701a] by ruking1
Mar 13, 2006 (9:56 am)

Replying to: john1701a (Mar 13, 2006 9:49 am)

I think on this subject ( and probably a host of others) you have not seen any statement that you have not failed to misread and misinterpret.. First of all NO ONE that YOU see as anti hybrid has declared themselves ANTI hybrid. It is YOU falsely declaring folks anti hybrid.
 
This is curious in that there are a host of folks who HAVE declared themselves anti diesel. In fact CA has attempted to and has been successful in BANNING new car diesel sales. So if that is your "ANTI" way of saying you are anti diesel, then I would agree with you saying you are anti diesel. So I would stop mischaracterizing folks as being anti hybrid, when it is your politically "correct" way of saying you are anti diesel.
#2878 of 5196
Re: Hybrids [john1701a] by moparbad
Mar 13, 2006 (10:52 am)

Replying to: john1701a (Mar 13, 2006 9:49 am)

That sudden surge of panic replies in response to my message was exactly what I had predicted. They were loaded with implications, misleading information, and denial of long-term goals.
 
Wahhaaahhhhaaaahhhaaaaahhaa!
 
Toyota built and entirely new plant in Texas to build what?
Prius? Nope. Hybrid? Nope? Larger, more powerful, less fuel efficient truck? Yes.
Toyota builds what in Princeton, Indiana? Prius? Nope. Hybrid? Wrong answer. Full size SUV's and trucks that obtain less than 20 mpg highway with a V8? Yes.
 
Toyota invests in TWO plants in the USA to manufacture large gas guzzlers and has yet to build one Prius in the US.
Does Toyota know something that they are not telling us?
 
Gosh, I can not condone buying a vehicle from a company that attacks the environment with huge, gas guzzling trucks and SUV's.
 
Toyota is playing a shell game with it's environmental image and it's environmental reality.
#2879 of 5196
Re: Hybrids [moparbad] by ruking1
Mar 13, 2006 (10:56 am)

Replying to: moparbad (Mar 13, 2006 10:52 am)

The Nummi Plant (Fremont, CA) used to do the majority of small cars but the greater % is the more profitable light truck assembly.
#2880 of 5196
Re: Hybrids [john1701a] by gagrice
Mar 13, 2006 (11:00 am)

Replying to: john1701a (Mar 13, 2006 9:49 am)

Go ahead if you want to keep feeding the anti-hybrid research
 
Just as you have fed the anti-diesel diatribe. However I did go and test drive the Prius. Have you driven a modern diesel car. Or do you just listen to extremist sources of information concerning the evils of diesel. I am willing to look at all possible solutions to the energy problems. Are You?
#2881 of 5196
Re: Hybrids [ruking1] by ruking1
Mar 13, 2006 (11:32 am)

Replying to: ruking1 (Mar 13, 2006 10:56 am)

http://www.nummi.com/tacoma.html
#2882 of 5196
Re: Hybrids [moparbad] by winter2
Mar 13, 2006 (1:33 pm)

Replying to: moparbad (Mar 13, 2006 10:52 am)

Kind of interesting how he disappears when he gets confronted.
 
Something interesting in your comments here. I think the correct word is hypocrisy. Toyota is engaging in hypocrisy. They advertise that they are trying save the environment with cars like the Prius but then mostly push their trucks and larger SUVs in their ads.
#2883 of 5196
Re: Hybrids [winter2] by jkinzel
Mar 13, 2006 (1:42 pm)

Replying to: winter2 (Mar 13, 2006 1:33 pm)

I think it's called "Follow the money" If you can sell green in your left hand and gas gusslers on your right and make profit from both sides, why not.
#2884 of 5196
Toyota by moparbad
Mar 13, 2006 (1:49 pm)
Avensis Wagon
 
Toyota offers the Avensis Wagon and Sedan with diesel in Europe, but who in their right mind would buy a Avensis diesel when they could own a Prius?
 
Avensis Wagon different angle
 
quote Toyota UK -2.2 litre D-4D direct injection engine will take the Avensis past 62 mph in 9.3 sec. and on to 130 mph, yet its fuel economy is rated at just 47.1 mpg combined and its NOx emissions no greater than those of the 2.0 litre 114 bhp D-4D.
 
2.0 litre turbocharged D-4D engine* - 114 bhp, maximum torque of 280 Nm, maximum speed 121 mph, acceleration to 62 mph in 11.4 seconds, fuel economy on the combined cycle 48.7 mpg, CO2 emissions 155 g/km. * Figures based on Avensis saloon.

 
D4D engines....drool.....
 
It makes sense if you think about it....if I owned a Avensis and HiLux with D4D I'd never need to buy a new vehicle again in my lifetime.
#2885 of 5196
Re: Toyota [moparbad] by winter2
Mar 13, 2006 (2:40 pm)

Replying to: moparbad (Mar 13, 2006 1:49 pm)

Handsome looking cuss! I doubt we will see it here in any form.
 
Do like the specs on the engine.
#2886 of 5196
Diesel by ibudic1
Mar 13, 2006 (3:05 pm)
I have a story to tell...
 
This last summer my wife and I took a trip around Europe in a Peugeot 407 2.0 HDI 6 speed that we leased for 1 month.
 
The car could go 220 kmp on highway and it would corner so well that it was beyond reproach. I don't have the handling numbers for it, but I did drive the new bmw 330i here in the US before I went over there. I know that Peugeot is a FWD and that BMW is RWD, but overall handling of the Peugeot was, in my opinion, superior to BMW.
 
The transmition of the Peugeot was set up so that you reach 40 kmp in first, 80 second and i think about 115 third. I am a hard-core type of guy when it comes to cars, but given a choice I'd take that diesel over any similarly powered gas engine even if it was a hybrid. PSA rocks.
 
When it comes to the environment, I'd like to add that the chemicals used to create batteries, and energy used to create batteries and the whole hybrid powertrain is pretty bad. Where and how are you going to dispose of those batteries? What if they leak? What fuel do you think was used to make the batteries out of ore?
 
There is no way around the fact that people will drive whatever they think will portray them as environmentally conscious or will save them money. If you want to save the world there is only 1 solution. Here it is, so pay attention.
 
Huge increase of tax on fuel. If I were the government, I'd hit the tax so that gas was 5 dollars. I'd also allow only people who are in transport business to buy gasoline with almost no tax, so that the price of goods delivered does not increase. All of the money extra earned (trillions) I would devote to research of alternative fuels. Since anything short of atomic power won't cut it this is where I'd go.
 
We don't have much time. Fuel will be running out, and countries that have the last reserves will have great negotiating power. US is not one of those countries. This is a bigger problem than most people realize, and you will see it happen in your lifetime. This is unlike 70's. China and other countries need more fuel to support their growing economies. There will be problems. Meanwhile we are digging ourselves in by having cheap fuel.

Messages Page 289 of 520
1
...
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
...
520
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement