Sign In Join 



Hybrids & Diesels - Deals or Duds? - READ ONLY

5196 messages,  Last post on Oct 16, 2006 at 6:55 AM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Alternative Fuels, Biodiesel, Hybrid Cars


Messages Page 288 of 520
1
...
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
...
520
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#2868 of 5196
Re: Point Reyes Light article [john1701a] by ruking1
Mar 13, 2006 (7:14 am)

Replying to: john1701a (Mar 13, 2006 5:57 am)

"Raising the CAFE standards is exactly what's needed."
 
I would disagree, almost totally.
 
We do not need the raising of CAFE standards, we just need cars built that actually GET higher fuel mileage.
 
While I understand your positions, and the sentiments that probably drive it, it is PRECISELY the CAFE structure and the compliance forthwith that DRIVES the (unwanted) consequences you have seen in reality for a long long time.
 
The CAFE standards are PRECISELY what allows selective enforcement such as the 5 state banning of "EPA directed programs" such as alternative fuels in which precisely the cars that do get better fuel mileage are banned.
 
It also allows Toyota to market in far more %, volume, profit, vehicles that get FAR less mpg than the Prius. What is overlooked or ignored it is the sales and profit of THESE OTHER cars that FUELS (no pun intended but will take it just the same) the success of this Prius vehicle, and NOT the so called success of the Prius.
 
I would dare say the new hydrogen (Honda Civic) powered cars would be a total waste of R & D monies time and effort, etc. Why? They DO NOT meet even the current CAFE standards and more importantly the current economical standards. For example; hydrogen is 16 dollars per gal (by weight) vs the current unconscionable prices of app 2.40 per gal, it also gets 22 mpg.
 
Also CAFE standards do exactly the opposite of what they purport to accomplish. I bought a 1970 VW Beetle in 1971 that got between 30-34 mpg. Fuel was .27-.29 cents per gal. Fast forward to my current 2004 Honda (Civic) which during a slightly different commute gets 37 mpg (app or so). I would hardly call this great strides in progress, mpg wise app 36 years later (slightly more than a generation later) . I just barely got a vehicle that gets between 44-62 mpg due to the narrow window in the way the CAFE regulations work.
 
So indeed if your assertions are true that emissions are getting FAR worse, what have we been paying for for the last 36 years?? Are you really saying the switch to unleaded regular has been a complete and utter SHAM?
 
Again, if marketing studies are to be believed, (in the case of the Hybrid), the Prius at even 2x the current production could be sold. Again the CAFE regulations help to create this "artificial" shortage. I suspect the oem's are using the current "shortage" to truly evaluate the REAL demand. They are smart as they have been wildly successful in creating the "BUZZ". However for continued success they can not afford to believe their own marketing hype.
#2869 of 5196
Re: Point Reyes Light article [ruking1] by gagrice
Mar 13, 2006 (7:37 am)

Replying to: ruking1 (Mar 13, 2006 7:14 am)

the Prius at even 2x the current production could be sold.
 
Has there been any move by Toyota to build the Prius in the USA? We are the largest market for that car. They have built a factory in China and are producing the Prius in that country. Why do you suppose they are not building a factory in the USA? The TCH is supposed to be built here. I think it presents less of a pollution problem. I understand the Camry Hybrid will have a smaller battery and electric motor. Mostly powered by the 4 cylinder engine. Maybe the experts can fill us in on that.
#2870 of 5196
Re: Point Reyes Light article [gagrice] by ruking1
Mar 13, 2006 (8:04 am)

Replying to: gagrice (Mar 13, 2006 7:37 am)

Actually to me this is a multi, multi, multi dimensional experience, as I have had a hand years ago in helping to convert an old Ford Mustang Plant (among others models) into an outlet shopping mall of app 1.75 M usable square feet, on app 110 acres of urban/suburban land.
 
But to make it more graphic for the purposes of this discussion, the cost effectiveness of the (subject) venture has probably yet to manifest itself.
#2871 of 5196
Hybrids by moparbad
Mar 13, 2006 (8:36 am)
Ford Escape Hybrid is selling poorly.
 
quote Amy Wilson of Auto News-As of early March, Ford had a 152-day supply of the Escape Hybrid at dealerships in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut, one source said. One dealer in that market has had a 2005 model parked on the lot for more than a year.
 
"We move it around, clean snow off it; it sits," said the dealer, who did not want to be identified.

 
Hybrid Highlander is not selling well. And it is no wonder why. Hybrids - Save Gas, Lose Money
 
Of course, no matter how much the Prius is hyped, no matter how many HOV stickers are handed out, no matter how much $$$$$ government welfare tax breaks are provide to entice buyers to hybrids, the Prius still fails to match the sales of the F150, or the Silverado. And the availability of Camry-Hybrid will prove that hybrids are a niche. So the consumer mindset is unchanging regardless of whether there are hybrids.
#2872 of 5196
Re: Hybrids [moparbad] by winter2
Mar 13, 2006 (9:08 am)

Replying to: moparbad (Mar 13, 2006 8:36 am)

All meaningful points to the vast majority of the car owning/buying public. But to hybrid supporters such as our friend John1701a, these points are meaningless. The included article is also meaningless to people like him. His point is that hybrids (Prius type design) are the only solution to the problem of fuel economy and clean emissions. That is all he and others like him see. A very clean diesel will be available shortly with Bluetec to cleanup NOx emissions. Still isn't clean enough for him.
#2873 of 5196
Re: Hybrids [winter2] by ruking1
Mar 13, 2006 (9:25 am)

Replying to: winter2 (Mar 13, 2006 9:08 am)

That position is CLEARLY in the EXTREME minority. Hybrids are LESS than 1% of the market, yet running into "significant" market resistance. So to put it in context, there are 235.4M registered vehicles in the "passenger vehicle fleet.
 
I posted an earlier link which indicated Honda (world wide)wanted to come out with a SUB 13,000 gasser hybrid. The good news is it is rated at 84 mpg. The bad news is CAFE regulations will probably keep it from our shores (USA)
 
I live in one of three CA epicenters for the Prius and it has yet to even make a statistically measurable reading ,much less a statistically correlated difference.
#2874 of 5196
Re: Hybrids [winter2] by gagrice
Mar 13, 2006 (9:27 am)

Replying to: winter2 (Mar 13, 2006 9:08 am)

You hit the nail on the head. He would add $20k to the price of the family sedan to save a pound of pollution over the life of the car. That is exactly what ZEV does over SULEV II. It is the holy grail of the extreme environmental zealot. Even LEV is very clean compared to a 6 year old Camry. They were the same as a VW TDI is today. How many millions of Camrys are still on the road older than 6 years old? They all pollute more than modern diesels.
#2875 of 5196
Re: Hybrids by john1701a
Mar 13, 2006 (9:49 am)

Replying to: gagrice (Mar 13, 2006 9:27 am)

Thanks!
 
That sudden surge of panic replies in response to my message was exactly what I had predicted. They were loaded with implications, misleading information, and denial of long-term goals.
 
Go ahead if you want to keep feeding the anti-hybrid research. It will make for great data later to reflect upon... as the numbers and variety of hybrids continue to grow.
 
JOHN
#2876 of 5196
Re: Hybrids [john1701a] by winter2
Mar 13, 2006 (9:55 am)

Replying to: john1701a (Mar 13, 2006 9:49 am)

An extremist to the end...
#2877 of 5196
Re: Hybrids [john1701a] by ruking1
Mar 13, 2006 (9:56 am)

Replying to: john1701a (Mar 13, 2006 9:49 am)

I think on this subject ( and probably a host of others) you have not seen any statement that you have not failed to misread and misinterpret.. First of all NO ONE that YOU see as anti hybrid has declared themselves ANTI hybrid. It is YOU falsely declaring folks anti hybrid.
 
This is curious in that there are a host of folks who HAVE declared themselves anti diesel. In fact CA has attempted to and has been successful in BANNING new car diesel sales. So if that is your "ANTI" way of saying you are anti diesel, then I would agree with you saying you are anti diesel. So I would stop mischaracterizing folks as being anti hybrid, when it is your politically "correct" way of saying you are anti diesel.

Messages Page 288 of 520
1
...
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
...
520
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement