Sign In Join 



Chevrolet Malibu MPG-Real World Numbers

294 messages,  Last post on Dec 05, 2009 at 1:38 PM

You are in the Chevrolet Malibu Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Chevrolet Malibu, Chevrolet Malibu Maxx, Fuel Efficiency (MPG), Hatchback, Sedan


Messages Page 15 of 30
1
...
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
...
30
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#138 of 294
39.9 MPG at 70 mph by clarencehollow
Aug 15, 2007 (11:46 am)
Reply
My 2005 New style 4 cylinder Malibu I bought in November of 2004 now has over 53,000 miles. The car still performs like a champ, and I recently got 39.9 mpg on cruise at 70 mpg for about a 70 mile trip. Keep your hybrids, and rice burners - I got you beat: in price, fuel economy and more. The VOLT is what I want next - bring it to us!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
#139 of 294
Re: 39.9 MPG at 70 mph [clarencehollow] by pulgo
Aug 15, 2007 (12:21 pm)
Reply

Replying to: clarencehollow (Aug 15, 2007 11:46 am)

What is your real MPG over a full month or a year?
 
A 70 mile trip means very little. It does not tell what the average Malibu owner may achieve over a longer period of time.
#140 of 294
Re: 39.9 MPG at 70 mph [pulgo] by gdubya2
Aug 17, 2007 (11:39 pm)
Reply

Replying to: pulgo (Aug 15, 2007 12:21 pm)

At the end of January 2006 I took delivery of a new Malibu sedan with the 4 cylinder engine. Since then I have driven over 15K and recorded every gallon of gas purchased. I drive a combination of city and highway miles and usually fill up when needing 10 or more gallons. So far I have averaged 29.96 MPG for 15,196 miles driven with a low of 23.4 MPG (winter) and a high of 40.1 MPG. The MPG has improved as the car has accumulated miles. I now seem to be getting 30 to 34 MPG on most fill-ups but cold weather (I live in Michigan) has a effect on MPG.
#141 of 294
Re: 39.9 MPG at 70 mph [gdubya2] by pulgo
Aug 18, 2007 (10:18 am)
Reply

Replying to: gdubya2 (Aug 17, 2007 11:39 pm)

Yours is exactly the information needed by a prospective buyer. A tank or two are not really meaningful.
Thanks for posting.
#142 of 294
An overdue report by malexbu
Sep 28, 2007 (4:38 pm)
Reply
First, a brief self-quote, from message #93 here:
 
,-- malexbu [ Jul 04, 2006 (9:53 pm) ] ---
| I just returned from a five-day round-trip. Here is what I've got:
| * Distance: 2741 miles
| * Avg. speed: 59 mph
| * Fuel used: 75.47 gallons
| * Fuel economy computer reading: 38.6 mpg
| * Fuel economy real: 36.32 mpg
 
| Was going through the terrible (North-) Eastern rains, pouring over
| the roads from MA to VA this past week. Was climbing the great Smoky
| Mountains in NC and TN -- mostly in the left-most driving lane, both
| in the mountains and on the roads with the posted speed limit of 70
| mph
 
| 2005 Malibu Base Sedan.
 
At the end of this August I had a similar trip -- only in my other
2005 Malibu Base Sedan. This time I was driving my child to the
college, going from Boston to Nashville with two passengers in and the
car loaded to the gills, and then back with one passenger and not much
stuff in. Since the load of the car was very different going in the
two directions, I accounted for them as two separate trips, resetting
DIC in the beginning of each one.
 
I also included driving in and around Nashville in the first trip.
 
Here are my results, with MPG shown by DIC and calculated as
Miles/Fuel in the two last columns of the following table:
 
--------------------------------------------
Trip -- Miles -- Speed - Fuel -- DIC -- Real
--------------------------------------------
MA-TN - 1202 --- 58 ---- 32.9 -- 37.3 - 36.52
TN-MA - 1142 --- 61 ---- 30.8 -- 38.6 - 37.05
--------------------------------------------
 
The car was performing flawlessly and provided all the comfort the
family needed, with temperatures hovering in the 100 F vicinity in TN,
and handling the Appalachian roads easily. The primary speed limiting
factor was the fear of being pulled over by a cop, which almost
happened in TN.
#143 of 294
Re: An overdue report [malexbu] by csandste
Sep 29, 2007 (10:08 am)
Reply

Replying to: malexbu (Sep 28, 2007 4:38 pm)

I'm too lazy to look up the 'Bu base sedan. This is the 4 cylinder rather than the 3.5 six, right?
 
I was lamenting the demise of the 3.5 but rented an HHR last week and was pleased with the engine (sure I had the high output, but I sure wasn't going to put premium in it). Think things should be just fine with the new Bu and the four cylinder.
#144 of 294
Re: An overdue report [csandste] by malexbu
Sep 29, 2007 (10:55 am)
Reply

Replying to: csandste (Sep 29, 2007 10:08 am)

Yes, a 2.2L 4-cylinder Ecotec -- and I love it.
#145 of 294
34.2 MPG by ls6454
Oct 13, 2007 (4:26 pm)
Reply
My 07 LS is averaging 34.2 MPG over 6000 miles.
#146 of 294
Re: 39.9 MPG at 70 mph [pulgo] by clarencehollow
Jan 03, 2008 (4:58 pm)
Reply

Replying to: pulgo (Aug 18, 2007 10:18 am)

Well let's see... the Malibu now has 60,000 miles and of that about 40,000 was highway. That's about 2,500 tankfuls JUST for the highway.My highway mileage has averaged around 35 to 38 over all. Not bad, and very real world to me. We just added an Altima.
#147 of 294
New 08 LTZ by jerrywimer
Feb 11, 2008 (7:54 am)
Reply
First tank has returned roughly 25mpg (guesstimating slightly, depending on whether the salesman filled the tank with 45 miles on the clock or with 46 ). This is mixed driving, stop and go, speed zones between 20 and 55 (me going up to 60) and trying to keep within the owner's manuals recommended 500 mile 'break-in' driving conditions. I anticipate easily breaking 30 when I resume my normal 90+ percent highway work route (31mi. one way, mountains of western NC).
 
I'm glad to see I'm not the only one that had good experiences with the 04-07 Malibu's though. Somewhere around here (maybe even earlier in this topic) I have posted results from that car (2004 LT sedan 3.5l / 4 speed auto). The general gist, off the top of my head, was numbers ranging from 24mpg on the low side (heavy traffic during the holiday shopping seasons in Asheville NC) to just over 38 mpg on an all-highway trip to WV from western NC. Kinda makes me wonder if GM had decided to use the electrically assisted steering, if my 08 3.6l / 6 speed auto's numbers would've gone up another 1 or 2 mpg over wherever they end up. (It can't possibly all be attributed to the 3.5l pushrod for the 04, can it?)

Messages Page 15 of 30
1
...
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
...
30
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement