Sign In Join 



Toyota Corolla Real World MPG

304 messages,  Last post on Oct 18, 2009 at 11:58 AM

You are in the Toyota Corolla Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Toyota Corolla, Fuel Efficiency (MPG), Sedan


Messages Page 20 of 31
1
...
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
...
31
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#184 of 304
BAAAAD mileage =/. by pgp
May 13, 2008 (2:48 pm)
Reply
I just bought a 06 corolla LE (auto) with 2700 miles on it. I refueled just today and I did the math to realize that I only got 200 miles with almost 8.7 gallons. That comes out to be around 22.3mpg, which is waaaaaaaaay lower that what i expected. I am driving in the city, trying to minimize the brake pressing. Only reason I bought this car is for the great gas mileage that everyone has been talking about, but I'm not getting it =/. Can somebody help me out?
#185 of 304
Re: BAAAAD mileage =/. [pgp] by busiris
May 13, 2008 (5:42 pm)
Reply

Replying to: pgp (May 13, 2008 2:48 pm)

A 2006 model with only 2700 miles?
 
Where did you get such a low mileage car?
#186 of 304
Re: BAAAAD mileage =/. [pgp] by mcdawgg
May 14, 2008 (5:20 am)
Reply

Replying to: pgp (May 13, 2008 2:48 pm)

Is this the first refuel that you did? Reason I ask is you don't know if the tank was full when you bought it, or how many miles it had been driven on this first tank before you started recording.
 
Also:
 
1. You can't base MPG on just one tank.
2. All makes and models have people complaining about MPG, but the driver and the conditions are HUGE variables here. A problem with a car that affects MPG is pretty rare.
3. The Corolla will deliver excellent MPG (best in class) if you compare equal conditions (driver and traffic, etc) to other cars.
 
Refuel at the same station, same pump, and use the trip odometers to track total miles driven until you refuel again. Refuel only until it shuts off - don't top off.
 
Try a few more tanks and let us know. Also note the driving conditions, speeds, how long stopped, etc.
#187 of 304
Re: Mixed Driving [bobw3] by kipk
May 15, 2008 (4:26 am)
Reply

Replying to: bobw3 (Sep 13, 2007 11:01 am)

>"explain how pressing the brake burns more gas"
 
Obviously pressing the brake is necessary.
 
How and when we use the brake will affect mileage. If we never had to use the brakes, we would get considerably better mileage. It would be like driving on the highway all the time.
 
Here are a couple of extremes to ponder.
 
Up ahead is a stop sign. If we let off the gas at a point that we will coast up the the sign and use the brake very little, there was an amount of road traveled using only the amount of gas necessary to idle the engine. If we stayed on the throttle until almost there, we burned unnessary fuel over that distance. If there are a couple of cars waiting their turn, when we get there, we may start-stop a couple of times before it is our turn to go. If we had "coasted" to the sign, possibly 1 or all the cars would have been gone and we would only have to stop and start once.
 
The traffic light ahead is red. There are several cars sitting. Slow down back here.
Let the car coast toward them. Hopefully by the time you get there they will be moving and you won't have to stop at all. OR we can keep accelerating, then slide up behind the last car while the light is still red. Wasted gas getting there, more wasted idling and waiting on the light to change, and more wasted accelerating the car from a stopped condition.
 
Tail gateing burns a lot of unnessary fuel. And doesn't get us there a bit faster. Actually someone tail gateing me will get there slower. I tend to slowly reduce speed to the posted speed limit when someone is on my bumper. If there is going to be a "Crash", I prefer it to take place at a lower speed.
 
Running up behind someone and hitting the brakes constantly, will burn a lot of unnessary fuel. Gas-brake, gas-brake.....! Any time the car accelerates, it uses more fuel than when "cruising" the same terrain. Stay back a few car lengths and enjoy the "cruise". This saves fuel, brakes, and tires.
 
So yes, using the brakes does cause extra fuel to be burned. Every time we use the brake we either just used extra fuel and/or we will use extra, getting the car back up to speed.
 
Kip
#188 of 304
Re: BAAAAD mileage =/. [pgp] by dkeanie
May 20, 2008 (10:37 am)
Reply

Replying to: pgp (May 13, 2008 2:48 pm)

I had the same problem although i have got a 95 1.6 Corolla.
First i git myself a bottle of Redex and followed the tips on how to get more mpg by the way you drive,and it has worked for me. I have just filled my car up today it took 45 litrres which gave me 380 miles which works out as 38.39 mpg which isn't bad.
I will be using Redex more often, and I am driving differently now. Couldn't beleive the price the petrol is.............£1.11. 9 ! what is this country coming too we are not all millionaires.
#189 of 304
Re: Very Happy 2009 Corolla S owner [tbarry] by jimwwhite
May 20, 2008 (12:17 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tbarry (Mar 24, 2008 6:37 am)

Now that you've had your '09 for a couple of months what do you think of it? Are you still getting the 44+ MPG? I'm looking at one this fall and I was pleased to read that you were getting such good gas mileage. I was considering a Prius because I drive almost 120 miles a day roundtrip to work and it's about 95% interstate with no slowdowns along the way. But if I can get into a Corolla that gets 44+ I'll go that way. I can't justify spending the extra $$$ the dealers have jacked the Prius up.
 
Thanks!
Jim
#190 of 304
Re: Very Happy 2009 Corolla S owner [jimwwhite] by hoopitup2000
May 28, 2008 (2:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: jimwwhite (May 20, 2008 12:17 pm)

I doubt anyone averages 44+ MPG with any Corolla. My 2005 has only gotten 44 twice in 3.5 years. I "average" about 40 Summer/34 Winter in mixed driving. If you want the highest MPG, avoid the automatic(will average only low/mid 30's mixed driving in warm weather), the sunroof and leather seats(extra weight). Regarding the 2009; I doubt the mileage is higher since it weighs more than previous model with basically the same engine. The revised EPA estimates are also lower on the newer models(37 vs 35 Highway). Get the 5 speed; learn how to drive efficiently(stay off those brakes & keep RPM under 2500 whenever possible) and you should be very pleased.
#191 of 304
Re: Very Happy 2009 Corolla S owner [hoopitup2000] by nippononly
May 28, 2008 (1:19 pm)
Reply

Replying to: hoopitup2000 (May 28, 2008 2:56 am)

With the automatic, the 2009 is rated one point higher than the 2008 was (with the 1.8): 27/35 now, vs 26/35 for the 2008.
 
Sadly, the manual is now rated two points WORSE for both city and highway.
#192 of 304
EPA ha by harvey44
May 31, 2008 (8:40 am)
Reply
I don't care what the EPA says. A good driver can beat the automatic with a stick. Except maybe in ideal conditions for the auto (where it never shifts and stays in top gear) 70 (?) mph on a flat highway.
#193 of 304
Re: EPA ha [harvey44] by hoopitup2000
May 31, 2008 (9:23 am)
Reply

Replying to: harvey44 (May 31, 2008 8:40 am)

Tha automatic adds about 100 pounds to the weight of the car. A skilled driver with a manual will always come out ahead of the automatic; especially in heavy city driving. On the open road the main factor is speed. Anything over 60; and the mileage starts to drop.

Messages Page 20 of 31
1
...
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
...
31
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement